Berrington Janet Elizabeth, Embleton Nicholas David
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 3;9:724280. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.724280. eCollection 2021.
There is no gold standard test for diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of onset is used in some definitions and studies in an attempt to separate NEC from focal intestinal perforation (FIP) with 14 days used as a cutoff. In a large, detailed data set we aimed to compare NEC and FIP in preterm infants born <32 weeks gestation, presenting before 14 days of life in comparison to cases presenting later. Infants with NEC or FIP when parents had consented to enrollment in an observational and sample collection study were included from 2009 to 2019. Clinical, surgical, histological, and outcome data were extracted and reviewed by each author independently. In 785 infants, 174 episodes of NEC or FIP were identified of which 73 (42%) occurred before 14 days, including 54 laparotomies and 19 episodes of medically managed NEC ("early"). There were 56 laparotomies and 45 episodes of medically managed NEC presenting on or after 14 days age ("late"). In early cases, 41% of laparotomies were for NEC (22 cases) and 59% for FIP (32 cases), and in late cases, 91% of laparotomies (51 cases) were for NEC and 9% (five cases) were for FIP. NEC presenting early was more likely to present with an initial septic presentation rather than discrete abdominal pathology and less likely to have clear pneumatosis. Early cases did not otherwise differ clinically, surgically, or histologically or in outcomes compared with later cases. FIP features did not differ by age at presentation. Although most FIP occurred early, 14% occurred later, whereas almost one third (29%) of NEC cases (surgical and medical) presented early. Infant demographics and surgical and histological findings of early- and late-presenting disease did not differ, suggesting that early and late cases are not necessarily different subtypes of the same disease although a common pathway of different pathogenesis cannot be excluded. Timing of onset does not accurately distinguish NEC from FIP, and caution should be exercised in including timing of onset in diagnostic criteria.
目前尚无诊断坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的金标准检测方法。在一些定义和研究中,发病时间被用于试图将NEC与局灶性肠穿孔(FIP)区分开来,以14天作为截断值。在一个大型详细数据集中,我们旨在比较孕周<32周、出生后14天内就诊的早产儿中的NEC和FIP,并与出生14天后就诊的病例进行比较。2009年至2019年纳入了父母同意参加观察性和样本收集研究的NEC或FIP婴儿。每位作者独立提取并审查临床、手术、组织学和结局数据。在785名婴儿中,共识别出174例NEC或FIP发作,其中73例(42%)发生在14天之前,包括54例剖腹手术和19例药物治疗的NEC发作(“早期”)。有56例剖腹手术和45例14天及以后出现的药物治疗的NEC发作(“晚期”)。在早期病例中,41%的剖腹手术是针对NEC(22例),59%是针对FIP(32例);在晚期病例中,91%的剖腹手术(51例)是针对NEC,9%(5例)是针对FIP。早期出现的NEC更有可能以最初的败血症表现而非离散的腹部病变出现,且气肿不太明显。早期病例在临床、手术、组织学或结局方面与晚期病例没有其他差异。FIP特征在就诊时的年龄方面没有差异。虽然大多数FIP发生在早期,但14%发生在后期,而几乎三分之一(29%)的NEC病例(手术和药物治疗)在早期出现。早期和晚期疾病的婴儿人口统计学特征以及手术和组织学发现没有差异,这表明早期和晚期病例不一定是同一疾病的不同亚型,尽管不能排除不同发病机制的共同途径。发病时间不能准确区分NEC和FIP,在诊断标准中纳入发病时间时应谨慎。