• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人降温对穿戴个人防护装备的医护人员的性能、舒适度和热应激的影响:来自西非的一项研究。

Impact of Personal Cooling on Performance, Comfort and Heat Strain of Healthcare Workers in PPE, a Study From West Africa.

机构信息

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, Gambia.

Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;9:712481. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.712481. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.712481
PMID:34540787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8440920/
Abstract

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is an essential component of safely treating suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients. PPE acts as a barrier to heat loss, therefore increasing the risk of thermal strain which may impact on cognitive function. Healthcare workers (HCWs) need to be able to prioritize and execute complex tasks effectively to ensure patient safety. This study evaluated pre-cooling and per-cooling methods on thermal strain, thermal comfort and cognitive function during simulated emergency management of an acutely unwell patient. This randomized controlled crossover trial was run at the Clinical Services Department of the Medical Research Unit The Gambia. Each participant attended two sessions (Cool and Control) in standard PPE. Cool involved pre-cooling with an ice slurry ingestion and per-cooling by wearing an ice-vest external to PPE. Twelve participants completed both sessions. There was a significant increase in tympanic temperature in Control sessions at both 1 and 2 h in PPE ( = 0.01). No significant increase was seen during Cool. Effect estimate of Cool was -0.2°C (95% CI -0.43; 0.01, = 0.06) post 1 h and -0.28°C (95% CI -0.57; 0.02, = 0.06) post 2 h on tympanic temperature. Cool improved thermal comfort ( < 0.001), thermal sensation ( < 0.001), and thirst ( = 0.04). No difference on cognitive function was demonstrated using multilevel modeling. Thermal strain in HCWs wearing PPE can be safely reduced using pre- and per-cooling methods external to PPE.

摘要

个人防护设备 (PPE) 是安全治疗疑似或确诊 SARS-CoV-2 患者的重要组成部分。PPE 起到防止热量散失的作用,因此会增加热应激的风险,从而可能影响认知功能。医护人员需要能够有效地优先处理和执行复杂任务,以确保患者安全。本研究评估了在模拟急性不适患者紧急管理期间,预冷和持续冷却对热应激、热舒适度和认知功能的影响。 该随机对照交叉试验在冈比亚医学研究单位临床服务部进行。每位参与者在标准 PPE 下参加两次会议(Cool 和 Control)。Cool 涉及通过摄入冰浆进行预冷和在 PPE 外部穿冰背心进行持续冷却。 12 名参与者完成了这两个会议。在 PPE 中,Control 会议在 1 小时和 2 小时时鼓膜温度均显著升高(= 0.01)。Cool 期间未见明显升高。Cool 的效应估计值在 1 小时后为 -0.2°C(95%CI -0.43;0.01,= 0.06),在 2 小时后为 -0.28°C(95%CI -0.57;0.02,= 0.06)。Cool 改善了热舒适度(<0.001)、热感觉(<0.001)和口渴感(= 0.04)。使用多层次建模未显示认知功能有差异。 使用 PPE 外部的预冷和持续冷却方法可以安全地降低穿戴 PPE 的医护人员的热应激。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/a92a10cc9497/fpubh-09-712481-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/afa6165d9679/fpubh-09-712481-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/ee51bbbdf4d9/fpubh-09-712481-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/a92a10cc9497/fpubh-09-712481-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/afa6165d9679/fpubh-09-712481-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/ee51bbbdf4d9/fpubh-09-712481-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03bc/8440920/a92a10cc9497/fpubh-09-712481-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Personal Cooling on Performance, Comfort and Heat Strain of Healthcare Workers in PPE, a Study From West Africa.个人降温对穿戴个人防护装备的医护人员的性能、舒适度和热应激的影响:来自西非的一项研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;9:712481. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.712481. eCollection 2021.
2
Heat Strain and Use of Heat Mitigation Strategies among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers Wearing Personal Protective Equipment-A Retrospective Study.COVID-19 医护人员穿着个人防护装备时的热应激与热缓解策略的使用——一项回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 8;19(3):1905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031905.
3
Field investigation of the heat stress in outdoor of healthcare workers wearing personal protective equipment in South China.华南地区医护人员穿戴个人防护装备进行户外作业的热应激现场调查。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1166056. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166056. eCollection 2023.
4
Heat Stress and Thermal Perception amongst Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Singapore.印度和新加坡 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的热应激和热感觉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;17(21):8100. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218100.
5
Effects of Heat Exposure and Ice Slurry Ingestion on Risk-Taking Behavior in Healthcare Workers.热暴露和冰浆摄入对医护人员冒险行为的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Oct 1;56(10):2016-2025. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003486. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses.冷却背心可减轻新冠疫情期间护士所感受到的热应激。
Temperature (Austin). 2021 Jan 20;9(1):103-113. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of Thermal Manikin Modeling and Human Subjects' Response During Use of Cooling Devices Under Personal Protective Ensembles in the Heat.热环境下个人防护装备中使用冷却装置时热人体模型建模与人体受试者反应的比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Jun;33(3):279-287. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000328. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus standard personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among frontline healthcare workers: the HydrOxychloroquine Prophylaxis Evaluation(HOPE) trial: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.羟氯喹联合个人防护装备与单纯标准个人防护装备用于预防一线医护人员 COVID-19 感染的效果比较:羟氯喹预防评估(HOPE)试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 31;21(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04679-3.
9
Personal protective equipment for COVID-19 among healthcare workers in an emergency department: An exploratory survey of workload, thermal discomfort and symptoms of heat strain.急诊科医护人员 COVID-19 个人防护装备:工作负荷、热不适和热应激症状的探索性调查。
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Jun;35(3):483-488. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14152. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Effects of cooling vest and personal protective equipment removal on thermoregulation in wildland firefighters during progressive thermal loads.渐进性热负荷下冷却背心和个人防护装备移除对野外消防员体温调节的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;12:1408591. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408591. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring eco-anxiety among women amid climate-induced heat: a comprehensive review.探索气候引发的高温下女性的生态焦虑:一项综合综述。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 19;16:1480337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480337. eCollection 2025.
2
Cooling vest improves surgeons' thermal comfort without affecting cognitive performance: a randomised cross-over trial.冷却背心可改善外科医生的热舒适感而不影响认知表现:一项随机交叉试验。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jun;80(6):339-345. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108457. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Despite negative perceptions of clinical trial conduct during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, are decentralized clinical trial methods here to stay?

本文引用的文献

1
Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses.冷却背心可减轻新冠疫情期间护士所感受到的热应激。
Temperature (Austin). 2021 Jan 20;9(1):103-113. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386. eCollection 2022.
2
The Impacts of Sun Exposure on Worker Physiology and Cognition: Multi-Country Evidence and Interventions.阳光暴露对工人生理和认知的影响:多国证据和干预措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(14):7698. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147698.
3
Occupational Heat Stress: Multi-Country Observations and Interventions.
尽管在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间人们对临床试验的开展存在负面看法,但去中心化临床试验方法会就此留存下来吗?
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 28;11(4):159. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-5. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical trials: a cross-sectional questionnaire study in China.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对临床试验的影响:一项在中国进行的横断面问卷调查研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(21):1154. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-777.
5
Resilience and Protection of Health Care and Research Laboratory Workers During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Analysis and Case Study From an Austrian High Security Laboratory.新冠疫情期间医护人员和研究实验室工作人员的复原力与防护:来自奥地利一家高安全级实验室的分析与案例研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:901244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901244. eCollection 2022.
职业性热应激:多国观察与干预。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126303.
4
Occupational Heat Stress and Practical Cooling Solutions for Healthcare and Industry Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.职业性热应激与 COVID-19 大流行期间医护和工业工作者实用降温解决方案
Ann Work Expo Health. 2020 Nov 16;64(9):915-922. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa082.
5
Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey.COVID-19 时代的个人防护设备和重症监护病房医护人员安全(PPE-SAFE):一项国际调查。
J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
6
The COVID-19 pandemic, personal protective equipment and respirator: A narrative review.《COVID-19 大流行、个人防护设备和呼吸器:叙事性综述》。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Oct;74(10):e13578. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13578. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
7
Personal Protective Equipment and Covid-19.个人防护装备与新冠疫情
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25;382(26):e105. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm2014809. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Occupational Heat Stress, Thermal Comfort, and Cognitive Performance in the OR: An Integrative Review.手术室职业性热应激、热舒适与认知表现:综合述评。
AORN J. 2020 May;111(5):536-545. doi: 10.1002/aorn.13009.
9
The impact of respiratory protective equipment on difficult airway management: a randomised, crossover, simulation study.呼吸防护设备对困难气道管理的影响:一项随机、交叉、模拟研究。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1301-1306. doi: 10.1111/anae.15102. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
The ventilation of multiple-bed hospital wards in the tropics: A review.热带地区多床位医院病房的通风:综述
Build Environ. 2011 May;46(5):1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.11.013. Epub 2010 Nov 27.