de Korte Johannus Q, Bongers Coen C W G, Catoire Milène, Kingma Boris R M, Eijsvogels Thijs M H
Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Physiology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
TNO, the Netherlands Organization for Applied Sciences, Department of Human Performance, Unit Defence, Safety and Security, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
Temperature (Austin). 2021 Jan 20;9(1):103-113. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2020.1868386. eCollection 2022.
Cooling vests alleviate heat strain. We quantified the perceptual and physiological heat strain and assessed the effects of wearing a 21°C phase change material cooling vest on these measures during work shifts of COVID-19 nurses wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). Seventeen nurses were monitored on two working days, consisting of a control (PPE only) and a cooling vest day (PPE + cooling vest). Sub-PPE air temperature, gastrointestinal temperature (T), and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Thermal comfort (2 [1-4] 1 [1-2], p < 0.001) and thermal sensation (5 [4-7] 4 [2-7], p < 0.001) improved in the cooling vest control condition. Only 18% of nurses reported thermal discomfort and 36% a (slightly) warm thermal sensation in the cooling vest condition 81% and 94% in the control condition (OR (95%CI) 0.05 (0.01-0.29) and 0.04 (<0.01-0.35), respectively). Accordingly, perceptual strain index was lower in the cooling vest control condition (5.7 ± 1.5 4.3 ± 1.7, p < 0.001, respectively). No differences were observed for the physiological heat strain index T and rating of perceived exertion across conditions. Average HR was slightly lower in the cooling vest the control condition (85 ± 12 87 ± 11, p = 0.025). Although the physiological heat strain among nurses using PPE was limited, substantial perceptual heat strain was experienced. A 21°C phase change material cooling vest can successfully alleviate the perceptual heat strain encountered by nurses wearing PPE.
冷却背心可减轻热应激。我们对感知和生理热应激进行了量化,并评估了在新冠疫情期间佩戴个人防护装备(PPE)的护士轮班工作时,穿着21°C相变材料冷却背心对这些指标的影响。在两个工作日对17名护士进行了监测,包括一个对照日(仅佩戴PPE)和一个冷却背心日(佩戴PPE + 冷却背心)。连续测量了PPE内的空气温度、胃肠道温度(T)和心率(HR)。与对照条件相比,冷却背心条件下的热舒适度(2 [1 - 4] 对1 [1 - 2],p < 0.001)和热感觉(5 [4 - 7] 对4 [2 - 7],p < 0.001)有所改善。在冷却背心条件下,只有18%的护士报告有热不适,36%报告有(轻微)温热感,而在对照条件下分别为81%和94%(优势比(95%置信区间)分别为0.05(0.01 - 0.29)和0.04(<0.01 - 0.35))。因此,冷却背心条件下的感知应激指数低于对照条件(分别为5.7 ± 1.5对4.3 ± 1.7,p < 0.001)。在不同条件下,生理热应激指数T和主观用力程度评分未观察到差异。冷却背心条件下的平均心率略低于对照条件(85 ± 12对87 ± 11,p = 0.025)。尽管使用PPE的护士生理热应激有限,但仍经历了明显的感知热应激。21°C相变材料冷却背心可成功减轻佩戴PPE的护士所遇到的感知热应激。