Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Stress. 2021 Nov;24(6):898-910. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2021.1957824. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
Arousing research has investigated stressed individuals' decision biases, but whether and how stress and individual traits interact to impact the underlying decision-making process is unknown. Here, we aim to explore the effect of acute stress on the interaction between the objective level of risk and subjective risk preference (i.e. risk-taking propensity). Eighty-three healthy males participated in the study. We adopted the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to induce acute psychological stress and categorized participants into the high or low risk-taking propensity (HRP/LRP) group according to their traits in daily life. The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) was applied to measure their feedback processing in a risky decision task, while behavioral indexes and EEG signals were recorded. The results showed that stressful participants pumped fewer times than the controls, especially for the LRP under stress, indicating that they were more willing to avoid taking risks. Compared with the stressed HRP group, the stressed LRP showed higher salivary cortisol responses and a more positive FRN following positive feedback in higher risk levels. It implies that acute psychological stress leads the LRP to overestimate the risk probability and become more cautious in the sequential processing of risk. These findings highlight the role of the feedback process and individual traits in risky decision-making under stress.
激发研究已经调查了压力个体的决策偏差,但压力和个体特征是否以及如何相互作用影响潜在的决策过程尚不清楚。在这里,我们旨在探讨急性应激对客观风险水平和主观风险偏好(即冒险倾向)之间相互作用的影响。83 名健康男性参与了这项研究。我们采用了特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)来诱发急性心理压力,并根据参与者日常生活中的特征将他们分为高或低风险倾向(HRP/LRP)组。气球模拟风险任务(BART)用于测量他们在风险决策任务中的反馈处理,同时记录行为指标和 EEG 信号。结果表明,应激组参与者的吹气次数少于对照组,尤其是应激下的 LRP,这表明他们更愿意避免冒险。与应激 HRP 组相比,应激 LRP 在更高风险水平下的正反馈后表现出更高的唾液皮质醇反应和更积极的 FRN。这意味着急性心理应激导致 LRP 高估风险概率,并在风险的序列处理中变得更加谨慎。这些发现强调了反馈过程和个体特征在应激下风险决策中的作用。