• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Autonomy in the intensive care unit: the refusal of treatment.

作者信息

Cassell E J

机构信息

Cornell University Medical College, New York.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):27-40.

PMID:3454241
Abstract

How to act in intensive care environments so that whatever is done for patients will be seen by them, then or in the future, to be in their own best interests is the problem presented by the need to defend patients' autonomy. Obstacles to patients' choice include abrogation of choice by doctors, the difficulties of discovering what patients actually wish for themselves, and the rapidly changing clinical circumstances typical of critical care. Many of these problems are obviated by discussing choices before emergencies arise with patients whose illnesses or planned surgery make the need for resuscitation a realistic possibility. Such discussions require careful delineation of the goals of resuscitation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Autonomy in the intensive care unit: the refusal of treatment.
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):27-40.
2
Patient autonomy, informed consent, and the reality of critical care.患者自主权、知情同意与重症监护的现实情况。
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):41-51.
3
Is consent useful when resuscitation isn't?当复苏无效时,同意还有用吗?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Nov-Dec;21(6):28-36.
4
The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients' and physicians' perspective.患者自主权与癌症治疗拒绝的医疗实践:患者与医生的视角
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2325-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.027.
5
Understanding and changing attitudes toward withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit.理解并改变重症监护病房中对撤除和 withhold 生命支持的态度。(注:“withhold”在这里结合语境,准确意思可能是“不予提供、停止使用”等,整体译文表述稍显生硬,可优化为“理解并改变重症监护病房中对撤除及停止维持生命治疗措施的态度” )
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11 Suppl):S317-23. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237042.11330.A9.
6
The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Stanford Law Rev. 1979 May;31(5):913-45.
7
Managed care: "new moves," moral uncertainty, and a radical attitude.管理式医疗:“新举措”、道德不确定性与激进态度。
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):290-305.
8
Do not resuscitate--decision making.
Isr J Med Sci. 1994 Sep;30(9):720-5.
9
Attitudes and practices of patients and physicians towards patient autonomy: a survey conducted prior to the enactment of the Patients' Rights Bill in Israel.患者与医生对患者自主权的态度及行为:以色列《患者权利法案》颁布前进行的一项调查。
Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth. 2000 Jul;10(4):119-25.
10
Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Oct;14(5):32-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment.限制家庭在终止维持生命治疗中的作用。
J Med Humanit. 1990 Summer;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01650689.
2
Heart transplantation without informed consent: discussion of a case.未经知情同意的心脏移植:一例病例讨论
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Mar;24(3):251-4. doi: 10.1007/s001340050559.