• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制家庭在终止维持生命治疗中的作用。

Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment.

作者信息

Puri V K, Weber L J

机构信息

Mount Carmel Mercy Hospital, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

J Med Humanit. 1990 Summer;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01650689.

DOI:10.1007/BF01650689
PMID:10107002
Abstract

In matters of discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment, traditional role of the family to speak on behalf of the incompetent patient is questionable. We explore the reasons why physicians perceive patient autonomy to be transferrable to family members. Principle of patient autonomy may not suffice when futile treatment is demanded and may serve to erode the ethical integrity of medical profession. An enhanced role for bioethics committees is proposed when physicians propose to discontinue life-sustaining treatment against the wishes of the patient or their families.

摘要

在停止维持生命治疗的问题上,家庭代表无行为能力患者发言的传统角色值得质疑。我们探究了医生认为患者自主权可转移给家庭成员的原因。当要求进行无效治疗时,患者自主权原则可能并不充分,且可能有损医学职业的伦理完整性。当医生提议违背患者或其家人的意愿停止维持生命治疗时,建议加强生物伦理委员会的作用。

相似文献

1
Limiting the role of the family in discontinuation of life sustaining treatment.限制家庭在终止维持生命治疗中的作用。
J Med Humanit. 1990 Summer;11(2):91-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01650689.
2
Limiting but not abandoning treatment in severely mentally impaired patients: a troubling issue for ethics consultants and ethics committees.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Spring;3(2):216-25. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004941.
3
Hospital guidelines for deciding about life-sustaining treatment: dealing with health "limbo".
Crit Care Med. 1986 Mar;14(3):239-46. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198603000-00016.
4
Ethical issues in withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.在停止和撤销维持生命治疗方面的伦理问题。
Indiana Med. 1992 May-Jun;85(3):218-21.
5
Should HECs assess whether 'clear and convincing evidence' standards have been met before recommending the discontinuation of life support, including nutrition and fluids? Point and counterpoint.医疗伦理委员会在建议停止包括营养和液体在内的生命支持之前,是否应该评估是否达到了“清晰且有说服力的证据”标准?正方和反方观点。
HEC Forum. 1991;3(5):299-304. doi: 10.1007/BF00168528.
6
Moral consensus in public ethics: patient autonomy and family decision-making in the work of one state bioethics commission.公共伦理中的道德共识:某州生物伦理委员会工作中的患者自主与家庭决策
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):149-68. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.149.
7
Forgoing life-sustaining treatment: limits to the consensus. Part 2.放弃维持生命的治疗:共识的局限。第二部分。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1993 Mar;3(1):1-19. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0075.
8
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs consider financial costs of care during case review? A reply.正方与反方观点。医疗伦理委员会在病例审查期间是否应考虑医疗护理的财务成本?一则回应。
HEC Forum. 1992;4(4):269-70; discussion 271. doi: 10.1007/BF00057789.
9
Ethical principles in critical care.重症监护中的伦理原则。
JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):696-700.
10
Point and counterpoint. Should HECs consider financial costs of care during case review?
HEC Forum. 1992;4(1):51-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00117617.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the family's role in treatment decisions.
Health Prog. 1986 Oct;67(8):50-2.
2
Ethical dilemmas in the care of the ill. I. What is the physician's service?照顾病患中的伦理困境。一、医生的职责是什么?
JAMA. 1980 Oct 17;244(16):1811-6.
3
Medical ethics' assault upon medical values.医学伦理对医学价值观的冲击。
JAMA. 1983 Oct 21;250(15):2011-5.
4
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitalized patients: continuing problems of decision-making.
Crit Care Med. 1987 Jan;15(1):41-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198701000-00009.
5
Must we always use CPR?我们必须一直使用心肺复苏术吗?
N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 12;317(20):1281-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711123172009.
6
Do-not-resuscitate orders for the incompetent patient in the absence of family consent.
Law Med Health Care. 1986;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1986.tb01666.x.
7
Behind closed doors. Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees.闭门之内:伦理委员会的承诺与陷阱
N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 2;317(1):46-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707023170110.
8
Autonomy in the intensive care unit: the refusal of treatment.
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):27-40.
9
Ethics committees and decisions to limit care. The experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital.伦理委员会与限制治疗的决策。麻省总医院的经验
JAMA. 1988 Aug 12;260(6):803-7.
10
Informed consent for major medical treatment of mentally disabled people. A new approach.
N Engl J Med. 1988 May 26;318(21):1368-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198805263182105.