Nicoara Sergiu-Mihai, Szamoskozi Stefan-Emeric, Mitrea Delia-Alexandrina, Leucuta Daniel-Corneliu
Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of General Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, 400029 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Mar 3;10(1):530-543. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010038.
This study is part of a doctoral thesis conducted at the Faculty of Psychology of Babes-Bolyai University in collaboration with the University of Medicine, both from Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The starting point of the study was based on the eternal question of the medical student-"How should I learn to manage to retain so much information?" This is how learning through conceptual maps and learning by understanding has been achieved. In the study, a number of 505 students from the Faculty of General Medicine were randomly selected and divided into groups, to observe changes in the grades they obtained when learning anatomy with the concept mapping method vs. traditional methods. Six months later, a retest was carried out to test long-term memory. The results were always in favor of the experimental group and were statistically significant (with one exception), most notably for the 6-month retesting. It was also observed that the language of teaching, different or the same as the first language, explains that exception, at least partially. Other results were taken into account, such as the distribution of bad and good grades in the two groups. Other parameters that influenced the obtained results and which explain some contradictory results in the literature are discussed. In conclusion, the use of conceptual maps is useful for most students, both for short and long-term memory.
本研究是在罗马尼亚克卢日-纳波卡的巴比什-波雅依大学心理学院与医学院合作开展的博士论文的一部分。该研究的出发点基于医学生的永恒问题——“我该如何学习才能记住这么多信息?” 概念图学习法和理解式学习法就是这样实现的。在这项研究中,随机选取了505名来自普通医学院的学生并将他们分成小组,以观察他们在使用概念图法学习解剖学与传统方法学习解剖学时成绩的变化。六个月后,进行了一次复试以测试长期记忆。结果总是有利于实验组,并且具有统计学意义(有一个例外),最显著的是在六个月后的复试中。还观察到,教学语言与第一语言不同或相同,至少部分地解释了那个例外情况。还考虑了其他结果,例如两组中成绩好坏的分布情况。讨论了影响所得结果并解释文献中一些矛盾结果的其他参数。总之,概念图的使用对大多数学生的短期和长期记忆都很有用。