Ferris State University, College of Pharmacy, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Ferris State University, College of Pharmacy, Big Rapids, Michigan.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Aug;85(7):8378. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8378. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
To evaluate faculty and student perceptions of and performance on virtual skills-based assessments focused on communication compared to in-person assessments. In spring 2020, virtual skills-based assessments were conducted. After all assessments were completed, two 12-item questionnaires, one for students and one for the faculty members who conducted the assessment, were designed to assess perceptions of virtual skills-based assessments. The surveys were distributed via an online platform to second- and third-year (P2 and P3) pharmacy students and to faculty who had participated in a virtual skills-based assessment. Scores from the spring 2020 virtual skills-based assessment were compared to scores on the in-person skills-based assessment that took place in spring 2019. Of the 19 faculty and 279 students invited to participate, 18 (94.7%) faculty and 241 (86.4%) students responded. The majority of faculty (88.9%) and students (63.5%) perceived the virtual skills-based assessments to be effective at simulating an interaction. However, only 33.3% of faculty and 28.6% of students preferred the virtual environment. There was not a significant difference in student performance between in-person and virtual assessments for patient consultation and SOAP note skills. Providing sufficient formative and summative feedback to pharmacy students is a challenge, particularly in the context of skills-based assessments. Students and faculty reported that the virtual assessment provided an opportunity for an appropriate assessment of student communication skills. However, a strong preference for using virtual skills-based assessments in the future was not observed.
评估教师和学生对虚拟技能评估的看法以及表现,这些评估侧重于沟通能力,与面对面评估进行比较。在 2020 年春季,进行了虚拟技能评估。在完成所有评估后,设计了两个 12 项的问卷,一个针对学生,另一个针对进行评估的教师,旨在评估对虚拟技能评估的看法。这些调查通过在线平台分发给第二和第三年(P2 和 P3)的药学学生和参与虚拟技能评估的教师。将 2020 年春季的虚拟技能评估得分与 2019 年春季进行的面对面技能评估得分进行比较。在受邀参加的 19 名教师和 279 名学生中,有 18 名(94.7%)教师和 241 名(86.4%)学生做出了回应。大多数教师(88.9%)和学生(63.5%)认为虚拟技能评估能够有效地模拟互动。然而,只有 33.3%的教师和 28.6%的学生更喜欢虚拟环境。在患者咨询和 SOAP 笔记技能方面,面对面评估和虚拟评估之间的学生表现没有显著差异。为药学学生提供充足的形成性和总结性反馈是一个挑战,尤其是在技能评估方面。学生和教师报告说,虚拟评估为评估学生的沟通技能提供了机会。然而,并没有观察到对未来使用虚拟技能评估的强烈偏好。