Sartawi Razan Yousef, McLeod Graeme, Mustafa Ayman, Lamb Clare
Center for Anatomy and Human Identification (CAHID), University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
Department of Anaesthesia, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Dec;46(12):1061-1066. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102887. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
Erector spinae plane (ESP) and retrolaminar (RL) blocks show unreliable spread. We hypothesize that the combination of ESP and RL blocks provides more extensive and reliable spread of dye than single ESP blocks. Our primary objective was to compare the spread of dye to the paravertebral spaces after the combination block and ESP block in Thiel embalmed cadavers. Spread, the primary end point, was defined as the number of paravertebral spaces colored with dye per injection.
A single anesthetist performed ultrasound-guided ESP (20 mL) and combination of ESP and RL (10 mL each) blocks at the third thoracic vertebra of eight soft embalmed Thiel cadavers. Tissue displacement was visualized on an adjacent strain elastography image. Cadavers were dissected 24 hours later and anatomical structures were inspected for the presence of dye.
Dye was visualized in more paravertebral spaces with the combination block (median 3 (IQR 3-5 (range 0-8)) vs 1.5 (IQR 0.25-2.75 (range 0-3) and difference (1.5 (0-4), p=0.04). Six out of seven (86%) combined erector spinae and RL blocks spread to at least three paravertebral spaces compared with two out of eight (25%) ESP blocks (RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 11.8; p=0.04). Contralateral spread occurred in three combination blocks and in one ESP block (OR 9.0, 95% CI 4.0 to 21.1; p<0.001).
In conclusion, the combination of ESP and RL blocks was more extensive and reliable than ESP block alone.
竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞和椎板后(RL)阻滞的扩散情况不可靠。我们假设ESP阻滞与RL阻滞联合使用比单纯的ESP阻滞能使染料扩散更广泛、更可靠。我们的主要目的是比较在经蒂尔防腐处理的尸体中,联合阻滞和ESP阻滞后染料向椎旁间隙的扩散情况。扩散情况作为主要终点,定义为每次注射后被染料染色的椎旁间隙数量。
一名麻醉医生在八具经蒂尔防腐处理的柔软尸体的第三胸椎处进行超声引导下的ESP阻滞(20毫升)以及ESP与RL联合阻滞(各10毫升)。在相邻的应变弹性成像图像上观察组织移位情况。24小时后对尸体进行解剖,并检查解剖结构中染料的存在情况。
联合阻滞时,在更多的椎旁间隙中观察到染料(中位数为3(四分位间距3 - 5(范围0 - 8)),而单纯ESP阻滞为1.5(四分位间距0.25 - 2.75(范围0 - 3)),差异为1.5(0 - 4),p = 0.04)。七例联合竖脊肌与RL阻滞中有六例(86%)扩散至至少三个椎旁间隙,而八例ESP阻滞中仅有两例(25%)如此(相对危险度3.4,95%可信区间1.0至11.8;p = 0.04)。三例联合阻滞出现对侧扩散,一例ESP阻滞出现对侧扩散(优势比9.0,95%可信区间4.0至21. [1] 1;p < 0.001)。
总之,ESP阻滞与RL阻滞联合使用比单纯的ESP阻滞扩散更广泛、更可靠。 [1]原文此处“21.1”疑似有误,推测可能是“21.1”,翻译时保留原文形式。