Suppr超能文献

用于评估超声引导下筋膜阻滞技能的指标的制定与验证。

Development and validation of metrics for assessment of ultrasound-guided fascial block skills.

机构信息

NHS Tayside, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK; Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;133(4):862-873. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.039. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As few anaesthetists provide lumbar erector spinae block for disc surgery, there is a need to provide training to enable a randomised controlled trial investigating analgesia after painful spinal surgery (NIHR153170). The primary objective of the study was to develop and measure the construct validity of a checklist for assessment of skills in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection using soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers.

METHODS

Twenty-four UK consultant regional anaesthetists completed two iterations of a Delphi questionnaire. The final checklist consisted of 11 steps conducive to best practice. Thereafter, we validated the checklist by comparing the performance of 12 experts with 12 novices, each performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae plane injections or fascia iliaca, serrato-pectoral (PEC II) and serratus injections, randomly allocated to the left and right sides of six soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. Six expert, trained raters blinded to operator and site of block examined 120 videos each.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval) internal consistency of the 11-item checklist for erector spinae plane injection was 0.72 (0.63-0.79) and interclass correlation was 0.88 (0.82-0.93). The checklist showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, experts vs novices {median (interquartile range [range]) 8.0 (7.0-10.0 [1-11]) vs 7.0 (5.0-9.0 [4-11]), difference 1.5 (1.0-2.5), P<0.001}. Global rating scales showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, 28.0 (24.0-31.0 [7-35]) vs 21.0 (17.0-24.0 [7-35]), difference 7.5 (6.0-8.5), P<0.001. The most difficult items to perform were identifying the needle tip before advancing and always visualising the needle tip. Instrument handling and flow of procedure were the areas of greatest difficulty on the global rating scale (GRS). Checklists and GRS scores correlated. There was homogeneity of regression slopes controlling for status, type of injection, and rater. Generalisability analysis showed a high reliability using the checklist and GRS for all fascial plane blocks (Rho [ρ] 0.93-0.96: Phi [ϕ] 0.84-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

An 11-point checklist developed through a modified Delphi process to provide best practice guidance for fascial plane injection showed construct validity in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection in soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers.

摘要

背景

由于很少有麻醉师为椎间盘手术提供腰椎竖脊肌阻滞,因此需要提供培训,以便能够对疼痛性脊柱手术后的镇痛进行随机对照试验(NIHR153170)。该研究的主要目的是制定并衡量使用软固定蒂尔尸体进行腰椎和胸椎竖脊肌筋膜平面注射的技能评估检查表的结构效度。

方法

24 名英国顾问区域麻醉师完成了两轮 Delphi 问卷调查。最终检查表包含 11 个有助于最佳实践的步骤。此后,我们通过比较 12 名专家和 12 名新手的表现来验证检查表的有效性,他们分别对 6 个软固定蒂尔尸体的左侧和右侧进行腰椎和胸椎竖脊肌平面注射或股外侧肌、胸肌(PEC II)和胸肌注射,随机分配。六位专家、经过培训的评判者对每个视频进行了 120 次盲测。

结果

11 项竖脊肌平面注射检查表的平均(95%置信区间)内部一致性为 0.72(0.63-0.79),组内相关系数为 0.88(0.82-0.93)。检查表显示出对腰椎和胸椎竖脊肌注射的结构有效性,专家与新手之间的差异为 1.5(1.0-2.5),P<0.001。腰椎和胸椎竖脊肌注射的整体评分显示出结构有效性,28.0(24.0-31.0 [7-35])与 21.0(17.0-24.0 [7-35])之间的差异为 7.5(6.0-8.5),P<0.001。在推进前确定针尖位置和始终可视化针尖是最困难的操作。仪器处理和操作流程是整体评分量表(GRS)上最困难的领域。检查表和 GRS 评分相关。控制地位、注射类型和评判者后,回归斜率具有同质性。使用检查表和 GRS 进行所有筋膜平面阻滞的可概括性分析显示出高度可靠性(Rho [ρ] 0.93-0.96:Phi [ϕ] 0.84-0.87)。

结论

通过修改后的 Delphi 过程制定的 11 分检查表为筋膜平面注射提供了最佳实践指南,在软固定蒂尔尸体上进行腰椎和胸椎竖脊肌筋膜平面注射时,该检查表具有结构有效性。

相似文献

3
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.

本文引用的文献

4
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验