Centre for Reproductive Research & Communication, British Pregnancy Advisory Service, London, UK
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Oct;48(4):246-251. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201242. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the World Health Organization recommend that services provide a choice between medical and surgical methods of abortion. We analysed qualitative study data to examine patient perspectives on abortion method choice and barriers to meeting them.
In-depth interviews with 24 clients who had an abortion at British Pregnancy Advisory Service clinics were carried out between December 2018 and July 2019 to examine perspectives of quality of abortion care. In this article we focus on client perspectives on choice of abortion method. We performed thematic analysis of data relating to choice of abortion method, refined the analysis, interpreted the findings, and organised the data into themes.
Participants' preferences for abortion method were shaped by prior experience of abortion, accessibility and privacy, perceptions of risk and experiences of abortion method, and information gathering and counselling. Participants' ability to obtain their preferred method was impacted by intersecting constraints such as appointment availability, service location and gestational age.
Our findings show that many factors shape participants' preferences for abortion method. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, some abortion services have constrained abortion method choices, with an emphasis on medical abortion and 'no-touch' care. Providers in the UK and beyond should aim to restore and expand more treatment options when the situation allows.
英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所、英国皇家妇产科医师学院和世界卫生组织建议服务机构提供药物流产和手术流产这两种方法供患者选择。我们分析了定性研究数据,以调查患者对流产方法选择的看法以及阻碍他们进行选择的因素。
2018 年 12 月至 2019 年 7 月,我们对在英国怀孕咨询服务中心进行流产的 24 名客户进行了深入访谈,以调查他们对流产护理质量的看法。在本文中,我们重点关注客户对流产方法选择的看法。我们对与流产方法选择相关的数据进行了主题分析,对分析进行了提炼、解释,并将数据组织成主题。
参与者对流产方法的偏好受到先前流产经历、可及性和隐私、对风险的认知和流产方法体验以及信息收集和咨询的影响。参与者获得首选方法的能力受到预约可用性、服务地点和妊娠年龄等交叉因素的影响。
我们的研究结果表明,许多因素影响了参与者对流产方法的偏好。为应对 COVID-19 大流行,一些流产服务机构限制了流产方法的选择,强调药物流产和“无接触”护理。英国和其他地区的提供者应在情况允许时努力恢复和扩大更多的治疗选择。