Li Mo, Li Fei, Jing Yuanqi, Zhang Kai, Cai Hao, Chen Lufang, Zhang Xian, Feng Lihang
College of Urban Construction, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 210009 China.
Institute of Defense Engineering, Academy of Military Science, PLA, Beijing, 100850 China.
Build Simul. 2022;15(5):817-830. doi: 10.1007/s12273-021-0826-3. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
Effective identification of pollution sources is particularly important for indoor air quality. Accurate estimation of source strength is the basis for source effective identification. This paper proposes an optimization method for the deconvolution process in the source strength inverse calculation. In the scheme, the concept of time resolution was defined, and combined with different filtering positions and filtering algorithms. The measures to reduce effects of measurement noise were quantitatively analyzed. Additionally, the performances of nine deconvolution inverse algorithms under experimental and simulated conditions were evaluated and scored. The hybrid algorithms were proposed and compared with single algorithms including Tikhonov regularization and iterative methods. Results showed that for the filtering position and algorithm, Butterworth filtering performed better, and different filtering positions had little effect on the inverse calculation. For the calculation time step, the optimal (time resolution) was 0.667% and 1.33% in the simulation and experiment, respectively. The hybrid algorithms were found to not perform better than the single algorithms, and the SART (simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique) algorithm from CAT (computer assisted tomography) yielded better performances in the accuracy and stability of source strength identification. The relative errors of the inverse calculation for source strength were typically below 25% using the optimization scheme.
有效识别污染源对于室内空气质量尤为重要。准确估算源强是污染源有效识别的基础。本文提出了一种源强反演计算中去卷积过程的优化方法。该方案定义了时间分辨率的概念,并结合不同的滤波位置和滤波算法。定量分析了降低测量噪声影响的措施。此外,对九种去卷积反演算法在实验和模拟条件下的性能进行了评估和打分。提出了混合算法,并与包括蒂霍诺夫正则化和迭代方法在内的单一算法进行了比较。结果表明,对于滤波位置和算法,巴特沃斯滤波效果更好,不同的滤波位置对反演计算影响不大。对于计算时间步长,在模拟和实验中,最优(时间分辨率)分别为0.667%和1.33%。发现混合算法的性能并不优于单一算法,计算机辅助断层扫描中的同时代数重建技术(SART)算法在源强识别的准确性和稳定性方面表现更好。使用优化方案进行源强反演计算的相对误差通常低于25%。