Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5192-5203. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13598. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
The impact of worsening renal function (WRF) on the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains controversial. We aimed to identify phenotypically distinct subgroups among individuals with both AHF and WRF using cluster analysis.
Overall, the data of 483 patients with both AHF and WRF enrolled in the West Tokyo Heart Failure Registry were analysed. Using cluster analysis, we identified three phenotypically distinct subgroups (phenogroups 1, 2, and 3). We assessed the impact of WRF on the prognosis of each phenogroup by comparing the incidence of composite endpoints, including all-cause death and re-hospitalization due to heart failure, with those of a propensity score-matched, non-WRF control group. Participants in phenogroup 1 (N = 122) were the youngest (69.3 ± 13.7 years), had relatively preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, 70.0 ± 27.7 mL/min/1.73 m ), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41.8 ± 13.7%). Conversely, participants in phenogroup 3 (N = 122) were the oldest (81.7 ± 8.5 years), had the worst eGFR (33.0 ± 20.9 mL/min/1.73 m ), and had preserved LVEF (51.7 ± 14.8%). The characteristics of the participants in phenogroup 2 (N = 239) were between those of phenogroups 1 and 3. The propensity score matching analysis showed that WRF was associated with a higher incidence of composite endpoints in phenogroup 1, whereas this association was not observed in phenogroups 2 and 3.
Using cluster analysis, we revealed three phenotypically distinct subgroups of patients with both AHF and WRF. WRF was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the subgroup of younger patients with reduced LVEF and preserved renal function.
肾功能恶化(WRF)对急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者预后的影响仍存在争议。我们旨在通过聚类分析确定同时患有 AHF 和 WRF 的个体中具有不同表型的亚组。
总体而言,对纳入西东京心力衰竭登记处的 483 例同时患有 AHF 和 WRF 的患者数据进行了分析。通过聚类分析,我们确定了三个具有不同表型的亚组(表型组 1、2 和 3)。通过比较每个表型组的复合终点(包括全因死亡和因心力衰竭再次住院)的发生率与无 WRF 倾向评分匹配对照组的发生率,评估 WRF 对每个表型组预后的影响。表型组 1(N=122)的患者年龄最小(69.3±13.7 岁),估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)相对保留(70.0±27.7 mL/min/1.73 m ),左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低(41.8±13.7%)。相反,表型组 3(N=122)的患者年龄最大(81.7±8.5 岁),eGFR 最差(33.0±20.9 mL/min/1.73 m ),LVEF 保留(51.7±14.8%)。表型组 2(N=239)患者的特征处于表型组 1 和 3 之间。倾向评分匹配分析显示,WRF 与表型组 1 复合终点发生率较高相关,而在表型组 2 和 3 中则未观察到这种相关性。
通过聚类分析,我们揭示了同时患有 AHF 和 WRF 的患者存在三种具有不同表型的亚组。WRF 与年轻患者 LVEF 降低和肾功能保留的亚组临床预后较差相关。