• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以关系为中心的咨询干预与载有 dapivirine 的避孕环整合应用于约翰内斯堡的女性艾滋病毒预防:CHARISMA 试点研究结果。

Integration of a Relationship-focused Counseling Intervention with Delivery of the Dapivirine Ring for HIV Prevention to Women in Johannesburg: Results of the CHARISMA Pilot Study.

机构信息

Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2022 Mar;26(3):752-763. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03434-2. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-021-03434-2
PMID:34546473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8840958/
Abstract

Biomedical, female-initiated HIV prevention methods can help reduce disproportionately high HIV rates among women in sub-Saharan Africa, but male partner resistance and intimate partner violence (IPV) may impact ability to ensure effective use. To support consistent use of the dapivirine vaginal ring (VR), we pilot-tested the impact of the CHARISMA relationship counseling intervention ("CHARISMA") with women enrolled in the multi-site open-label Microbicide Trials Network (MTN) 025/HOPE trial at the Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Research Institute (Wits RHI) site in Johannesburg, South Africa. Lay counselors used a 42-item tool with five subscales to assess relationships and IPV and provide tailored counseling at enrolment, followed by a booster counselling session at Month 1 and follow-up checks at Months 3 and 6. We evaluated potential impact by examining self-reported ring disclosure to partners, partner clinic attendance, self-reported incident social harms (SH) and IPV, and biomarkers of ring adherence at Wits RHI. We subsequently compared these outcomes at three comparator HOPE study sites using multivariable regression models. Comparator study sites were purposively selected as those most similar to Wits RHI for baseline characteristics identified a priori. At Wits RHI, 95 of 96 (99%) HOPE participants enrolled into the CHARISMA pilot study. Mean age was 30, 36.8% lived with a partner, and 85.3% received their partner's financial support. During the six months of pilot study follow-up, participants reported: ring use disclosure to partners at 72.7% visits; 4.3% partners attending the research clinic; one partner-related SH; and 9.5% experienced incident IPV. The mean level of dapivirine released from returned used rings was 3.4 mg (SD 1.56), suggesting moderate adherence. Participants in the CHARISMA pilot had high background prevalence and incidence of IPV but were nevertheless able to adhere to ring use, and some male partners came to the research clinic. In adjusted regression models, compared to Wits RHI, partner clinic attendance was lower at all comparator sites; and significantly so at Site A (aRR 0.12, 95% CI 0.00-0.98). Sites B and C had lower levels of dapivirine released (suggesting lower adherence), but this difference was not significant. Site B women were more likely to report ring disclosure to partners at FU visits (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.25). IPV reported during follow-up was significantly lower at Site B (aRR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.98, p = 0.047). CHARISMA taught women skills to decide on levels of ring-use disclosure to partners or others; therefore it is difficult to interpret differences in ring disclosure to partners with other sites. Similarly, CHARISMA heightened participants' awareness of abuse, possibly increasing IPV reports. Testing CHARISMA under fully-powered controlled conditions will improve understanding of its impact on women's relationships and ability to use female-initiated HIV prevention methods.

摘要

生物医学女性主导的 HIV 预防方法可以帮助减少撒哈拉以南非洲地区女性中不成比例的高 HIV 发病率,但男性伴侣的抵制和亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)可能会影响确保有效使用的能力。为了支持 dapivirine 阴道环(VR)的持续使用,我们在南非约翰内斯堡威特沃特斯兰德大学生殖健康和艾滋病毒研究所以及希望研究所(Wits RHI)的多地点开放标签微生素试验网络(MTN)025/HOPE 试验中招募的女性中试点测试了 CHARISMA 关系咨询干预(“CHARISMA”)的影响。非专业顾问使用了一个包含 5 个子量表的 42 项工具来评估关系和 IPV,并在入组时提供定制咨询,然后在第 1 个月和第 3 个月和第 6 个月进行强化咨询检查。我们通过检查向伴侣报告的环披露、伴侣就诊、自我报告的社会伤害(SH)和 IPV 以及 Wits RHI 的环依从性生物标志物,评估了潜在的影响。我们随后使用多变量回归模型在三个 HOPE 研究比较点比较了这些结果。比较点研究地点是根据预先确定的基线特征有目的地选择的,与 Wits RHI 最相似。在 Wits RHI,96 名 HOPE 参与者中的 95 名(99%)入组了 CHARISMA 试点研究。平均年龄为 30 岁,36.8%与伴侣同住,85.3%获得伴侣的经济支持。在六个月的试点研究随访期间,参与者报告:72.7%的就诊时向伴侣报告了环的使用情况;4.3%的伴侣参加了研究诊所;1 例与伴侣相关的 SH;9.5%经历了偶发性 IPV。从返回的使用过的环中释放的 dapivirine 的平均水平为 3.4 mg(SD 1.56),表明中度依从性。CHARISMA 试点项目的参与者背景中 IPV 的发生率很高,但尽管如此,他们仍然能够坚持使用戒指,并且一些男性伴侣来到了研究诊所。在调整后的回归模型中,与 Wits RHI 相比,所有比较点的伴侣就诊率都较低;在 A 点(ARR 0.12,95%CI 0.00-0.98)差异显著。B 点和 C 点释放的 dapivirine 水平较低(表明依从性较低),但差异不显著。B 点的女性更有可能在 FU 就诊时向伴侣报告戒指的使用情况(ARR 1.12,95%CI 1.00-1.25)。在随访期间报告的 IPV 明显低于 B 点(ARR 0.20,95%CI 0.04-0.98,p=0.047)。CHARISMA 教会了女性决定向伴侣或其他人披露戒指使用水平的技能;因此,很难解释与其他地点的伴侣对戒指披露的差异。同样,CHARISMA 提高了参与者对虐待的认识,可能会增加 IPV 的报告。在充分的对照条件下测试 CHARISMA 将有助于更好地了解其对女性关系和使用女性主导的 HIV 预防方法的能力的影响。

相似文献

1
Integration of a Relationship-focused Counseling Intervention with Delivery of the Dapivirine Ring for HIV Prevention to Women in Johannesburg: Results of the CHARISMA Pilot Study.以关系为中心的咨询干预与载有 dapivirine 的避孕环整合应用于约翰内斯堡的女性艾滋病毒预防:CHARISMA 试点研究结果。
AIDS Behav. 2022 Mar;26(3):752-763. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03434-2. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
Evidence for use of a healthy relationships assessment tool in the CHARISMA pilot study.用于 CHARISMA 初步研究的健康关系评估工具的使用证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261526. eCollection 2021.
3
The relationship between vaginal ring use and intimate partner violence and social harms: formative research outcomes from the CHARISMA study in Johannesburg, South Africa.阴道环使用与亲密伴侣暴力及社会危害之间的关系:南非约翰内斯堡CHARISMA研究的形成性研究结果。
AIDS Care. 2019 Jun;31(6):660-666. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1533227. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Acceptability and feasibility of the CHARISMA counseling intervention to support women's use of pre-exposure prophylaxis: results of a pilot study.CHARISMA 咨询干预措施支持女性使用暴露前预防的可接受性和可行性:一项试点研究的结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01262-z.
5
Impact of Male Partner Involvement on Women's Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring During a Phase III HIV Prevention Trial.男性伴侣参与对女性在 III 期 HIV 预防试验中对双夫定阴道环的依从性的影响。
AIDS Behav. 2020 May;24(5):1432-1442. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02707-1.
6
The CHARISMA Randomized Controlled Trial: A Relationship-Focused Counseling Intervention Integrated Within Oral PrEP Delivery for HIV Prevention Among Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.CHARISMA 随机对照试验:在南非约翰内斯堡,针对接受口服暴露前预防(PrEP)的女性,将以关系为重点的咨询干预整合到 PrEP 服务中,以预防艾滋病毒。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Aug 1;90(4):425-433. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002991.
7
Impact of Partner-Related Social Harms on Women's Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring During a Phase III Trial.伴侣相关社会危害对女性在 III 期临床试验中坚持使用地蒽诺辛阴道环的影响。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 15;79(5):580-589. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001866.
8
Development and initial validation of a simple tool to screen for partner support or opposition to HIV prevention product use.开发并初步验证一种简单的工具,以筛查伴侣对艾滋病毒预防产品使用的支持或反对情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0242881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242881. eCollection 2020.
9
Safety, uptake, and use of a dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV-1 prevention in African women (HOPE): an open-label, extension study.安全性、接受度和使用 dapivirine 阴道环预防非洲妇女感染 HIV-1(HOPE):一项开放标签扩展研究。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Feb;8(2):e87-e95. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30304-0.
10
Changes in relationships, HIV risk, and feelings towards PrEP: findings from a qualitative explanatory study among participants in the CHARISMA intervention trial.关系变化、HIV 风险和对 PrEP 的看法:CHARISMA 干预试验参与者定性解释研究的结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02603-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Gender-Based Violence Services Into HIV Care: Insights From Malawi.将基于性别的暴力服务纳入艾滋病护理:来自马拉维的见解。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2025 Aug 14;13(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00177.
2
HIV Prevention and Sexual Health Conversations Among Women in Ending the HIV Epidemic Priority Communities: A Qualitative Exploration of Experiences and Preferences.在终结艾滋病流行重点社区中女性之间的艾滋病毒预防与性健康对话:对经历和偏好的定性探索
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr;54(4):1537-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03108-3. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Measuring Effects of Counseling to Increase Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence and Partner Support in South Africa Using the Healthy Relationship Assessment Tool.使用健康关系评估工具测量南非提高暴露前预防药物依从性和伴侣支持的咨询效果。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Oct 30;11(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00075.
4
Baseline preferences for oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or dapivirine intravaginal ring for HIV prevention among adolescent girls and young women in South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe (MTN-034/IPM-045 study).南非、乌干达和津巴布韦青春期少女和年轻女性对口服暴露前预防 (PrEP) 或双夫定阴道环用于 HIV 预防的基线偏好(MTN-034/IPM-045 研究)。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287525. eCollection 2023.
5
Integrating Gender-Based Violence Screening and Support into the Research Clinic Setting: Experiences from an HIV Prevention Open-Label Extension Trial in Sub-Saharan Africa.将基于性别的暴力筛查和支持纳入研究诊所环境:来自撒哈拉以南非洲地区一项艾滋病毒预防开放性扩展试验的经验。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Apr;27(4):1277-1286. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03864-6. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging male partners in women's microbicide use: evidence from clinical trials and implications for future research and microbicide introduction.让男性伴侣参与女性使用杀微生物剂:临床试验证据及其对未来研究和杀微生物剂推广的意义。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Sep 8;17(3 Suppl 2):19159. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.3.19159. eCollection 2014.