Suppr超能文献

比较青光眼的结构、功能、眼压和视力测试:一项前瞻性诊断准确性研究。

Comparison of Structural, Functional, Tonometric, and Visual Acuity Testing for Glaucoma: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

机构信息

Narayana Nethralaya Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India; Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Narayana Nethralaya Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 May-Jun;5(3):345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of potential screening tests for moderate to advanced glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.

PARTICIPANTS

The study enrolled a consecutive series of patients aged ≥50 years who presented to a glaucoma clinic in South India without ever having received automated visual field testing.

METHODS

All participants underwent 8 index tests: OCT of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, optic disc photography, Moorfield's Motion Displacement Test (MDT), frequency doubling technique perimetry, noncontact tonometry, pneumatonometry, presenting visual acuity, and best-corrected visual acuity. Participants also underwent stereoscopic photographs and Humphrey visual fields, which were used by 2 ophthalmologists to arrive at the reference standard diagnosis of moderate to advanced glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 217 people were enrolled; 321 eyes from 180 participants had all tests performed. Of these, 127 eyes (40%) were classified as having moderate to advanced glaucoma. Among the 8 tests, OCT best optimized sensitivity (84%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 76-90) and specificity (75%, 95% CI, 68-81). Moorfield's Motion Displacement Test was the best perimetric test, with a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 85-96) and specificity of 53% (95% CI, 44-61). Pressure and vision tests were not sensitive (e.g., sensitivity of 16%, 95% CI, 9-23 for noncontact tonometry and 23%, 95% CI, 15-31 for best-corrected visual acuity). Moorfield's Motion Displacement Test identified 16 of 127 eyes (13%) with glaucoma that were not captured by OCT, but also had false-positive results in 65 of 194 eyes (34%) without glaucoma that OCT correctly classified as negative.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT had moderate sensitivity and fair specificity for diagnosing moderate to advanced glaucoma and should be prioritized during an initial assessment for glaucoma.

摘要

目的

确定中重度青光眼潜在筛查试验的诊断准确性。

设计

前瞻性诊断测试准确性研究。

参与者

该研究纳入了一系列连续就诊于印度南部一家青光眼诊所的年龄≥50 岁患者,他们之前从未接受过自动视野检查。

方法

所有参与者均接受了 8 项指标测试:视盘周围视网膜神经纤维层的 OCT、视盘照相、莫菲尔德运动位移测试(MDT)、频域光相干断层扫描、非接触眼压计、眼压描记法、眼前视力和最佳矫正视力。参与者还接受了立体照相和 Humphrey 视野检查,由 2 位眼科医生根据这些检查结果得出中重度青光眼的参考标准诊断。

主要观察指标

敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比。

结果

共纳入 217 人;180 名参与者的 321 只眼接受了所有检查。其中,127 只眼(40%)被归类为中重度青光眼。在 8 项检查中,OCT 的敏感性最佳(84%,95%置信区间[CI],76%90%),特异性也最佳(75%,95%CI,68%81%)。莫菲尔德运动位移测试是最好的视野检查,敏感性为 91%(95%CI,85%96%),特异性为 53%(95%CI,44%61%)。眼压和视力检查的敏感性均不高(例如,非接触眼压计的敏感性为 16%,95%CI,9%23%,最佳矫正视力的敏感性为 23%,95%CI,15%31%)。莫菲尔德运动位移测试发现了 127 只眼中的 16 只(13%)用 OCT 检查未发现的青光眼,但在 194 只无青光眼的眼中也出现了 65 例(34%)假阳性结果,而 OCT 正确地将这些眼归类为阴性。

结论

OCT 对中重度青光眼的诊断具有中等敏感性和良好的特异性,在青光眼初步评估时应优先考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验