Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Open University, PO Box 2960, 6401 DL, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 15;300:113749. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113749. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
Public trust in water managers is often considered an important precondition for the effective implementation of sustainable water-management practices. Although it is well known that general public trust in government institutions is under pressure, much less is known in the literature on water governance whether such distrust also affects general and task-specific trust of the wider public in water managers. In addition, empirical studies on the determinants of such trust seem to be scarce. To fill those gaps, this study aims to measure general and task-specific public trust in water managers in the Netherlands and to assess how a selected group of potential determinants is related to general- and task-specific trust in water managers. To this end, we employ an original survey among a representative sample of the Dutch population (N = 2262). We find that trust in water managers in the Netherlands is generally high, but that it also comes with some task-specific variations. People have more trust in the flood-protection capacities of the water managers than in the capacities to successfully manage surface-water quality, nature conservation, and drought management. Using linear regression models, we subsequently find that individual-level variations in trust in water managers are best explained by one's general level of political trust. Additionally, we also show that both risk perceptions and self-evaluations of how informed people feel themselves about water management are important factors with (curvilinear) relations with trust in water managers. Overall, we conclude that water managers are under specific conditions able to build themselves well-established reputations and relatively high trust levels based on their performances. Nevertheless, trust development is far from entirely in the hands of the water managers themselves as we also conclude that trust evaluations of water managers are not immune from negative generalized political evaluations and public perceptions on water related risks.
公众对水管理人员的信任通常被认为是有效实施可持续水资源管理实践的重要前提。尽管众所周知,公众对政府机构的普遍信任受到压力,但在水治理文献中,人们对这种不信任是否也会影响广大公众对水管理人员的一般信任和特定任务的信任知之甚少。此外,关于这种信任的决定因素的实证研究似乎也很少。为了填补这些空白,本研究旨在衡量荷兰公众对水管理人员的一般信任和特定任务的信任,并评估选定的一组潜在决定因素与对水管理人员的一般信任和特定任务的信任之间的关系。为此,我们在荷兰代表性人口样本(N=2262)中进行了一项原始调查。我们发现,荷兰对水管理人员的信任普遍较高,但也存在一些特定任务的差异。人们对水管理人员的防洪能力的信任度高于对地表水质量、自然保护和干旱管理的成功管理能力的信任度。使用线性回归模型,我们随后发现,对水管理人员的信任程度的个体差异可以通过一个人对政治的普遍信任程度来很好地解释。此外,我们还表明,风险感知和自我评估人们对水管理的了解程度是与对水管理人员的信任具有(曲线)关系的重要因素。总体而言,我们的结论是,在特定条件下,水管理人员能够根据自身的表现建立良好的声誉和相对较高的信任水平。然而,信任的发展远非完全掌握在水管理人员自己手中,因为我们还得出结论,对水管理人员的信任评估不受负面普遍政治评估和公众对水相关风险的看法的影响。