Kubinec Robert, Lee Haillie Na-Kyung, Tomashevskiy Andrey
Division of Social Sciences New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi UAE.
Seoul National University Gwanak-gu Seoul Korea.
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2155-2169. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13040. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
While the aim of COVID-19 policies is to suppress the pandemic, many fear that the burden of the restrictions will fall more heavily on less privileged groups. We show one potential mechanism for COVID-19 responses to increase inequality by examining the intersection of business restrictions and business political connections.
We fielded an online survey of 2735 business employees and managers in Ukraine, Egypt, and Venezuela over the summer of 2020 to collect data on companies' closures due to COVID-19 and nuanced information about their political connections.
We show that businesses with political connections to government officials were significantly less likely to shut down as a result of COVID-19 policies. This finding suggests that measures designed to mitigate COVID-19 are ineffective in countries with a weak rule of law if politically connected firms are able to circumvent restrictions by leveraging political connections to receive preferential treatment. In addition, politically connected firms are no more likely-and sometimes even less likely-to engage in social-distancing policies to mitigate the pandemic despite the fact that they are more likely to remain open.
虽然新冠疫情政策的目标是抑制疫情大流行,但许多人担心限制措施的负担将更多地落在弱势群体身上。我们通过研究商业限制与商业政治关联的交叉点,展示了新冠疫情应对措施加剧不平等的一种潜在机制。
2020年夏天,我们对乌克兰、埃及和委内瑞拉的2735名企业员工和经理进行了在线调查,以收集有关公司因新冠疫情而关闭的数据以及有关其政治关联的细致信息。
我们发现,与政府官员有政治关联的企业因新冠疫情政策而关闭的可能性显著降低。这一发现表明,如果有政治关联的公司能够通过利用政治关联获得优惠待遇来规避限制,那么在法治薄弱的国家,旨在缓解新冠疫情的措施是无效的。此外,有政治关联的公司尽管更有可能继续营业,但它们采取社交距离政策以缓解疫情的可能性并不更高,有时甚至更低。