Colombo Cinzia, Candiani Giulia, Satolli Roberto, Roberto Anna, Giordano Livia, Paci Eugenio, Mosconi Paola
Istituto di ricerche farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano;
Zadig, Agenzia di editoria scientifica, Milano.
Epidemiol Prev. 2021 Jul-Aug;45(4):281-288. doi: 10.19191/EP21.4.P281.084.
The decision aid "Donnainformata-mammografia" (https://www.donnainformata-mammografia.it/en/) has been developed with the aim of providing clear information on the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening, and the controversies on the relationship between mortality reduction and overdiagnosis. It was evaluated in a randomized clinical trial showing it increases informed choice and does not decrease participation in screening.This article describes the framework, the guiding principles, and the operational phases of the tool development.The project was developed within the national screening programme. The promoters decided to state their placement, to start from the information needs of women and what is already known, and to balance spontaneous navigation with "nudging" to key contents. Three focus groups with 18 women and 4 interviews were organized. Participants expressed a favourable attitude towards screening, and no knowledge of the debate on screening efficacy and overdiagnosis. A literature review and a comparison of decision aids were conducted. The online tool included the results of these steps. The home page presents key information with links to relevant topics, so that the person can decide to stop there having an overview or to continue. The «ready to decide» button, which leads to the section of decision support, can be clicked on every page. Here, the person can evaluate a list of key points on the basis of her values, in order to decide to participate in screening or not.
决策辅助工具“Donnainformata - mammografia”(https://www.donnainformata - mammografia.it/en/)的开发旨在提供有关乳腺癌筛查的益处和危害,以及死亡率降低与过度诊断之间关系的争议的清晰信息。它在一项随机临床试验中进行了评估,结果表明该工具增加了知情选择,且并未降低筛查参与率。本文描述了该工具开发的框架、指导原则和操作阶段。该项目是在国家筛查计划内开展的。推动者决定表明其立场,从女性的信息需求以及已知情况出发,并在自然浏览与对关键内容的“引导”之间取得平衡。组织了三个由18名女性参与的焦点小组和4次访谈。参与者对筛查表达了积极态度,且对筛查效果和过度诊断的争论一无所知。开展了文献综述以及决策辅助工具的比较。在线工具纳入了这些步骤的结果。主页呈现关键信息并带有指向相关主题的链接,以便用户可以在此决定是否停止浏览并获得概览,或者继续浏览。“准备好做决定”按钮可在每一页点击,点击后会进入决策支持部分。在此,用户可以根据自身价值观评估一系列关键点,从而决定是否参与筛查。