• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上网搜索能纠正错误信念吗?在线搜索的认知和情感后果。

Can "Googling" correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search.

机构信息

Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, S. A. R., China.

Faculty of Human Sciences, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0256575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256575. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0256575
PMID:34550993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8457483/
Abstract

With increasing concern over online misinformation in perspective, this study experimentally examined the cognitive as well as the affective consequences of online search. Results of the two experiments using widely shared, prejudiced misinformation about an ethnic minority in Japan indicated that (a) online search reduces on average the likelihood of believing the misinformation, (b) the magnitude of the effect is larger among those who are predisposed to believe the misinformation, (c) cognitive correction is observed whether searchers are motivated to achieve a directional goal or an accuracy goal, and (d) online search deteriorates affective feeling toward the target groups of the misinformation. Theoretical implications are discussed in relation to the robustness of confirmation bias in online search and the "belief echo" in which exposure to negative misinformation continues to shape attitudes even after the misinformation has been effectively discredited.

摘要

随着人们对网络错误信息的关注度不断提高,本研究通过实验考察了网络搜索带来的认知和情感后果。使用在日本广为传播的、带有偏见的少数民族错误信息进行的两项实验结果表明:(a)网络搜索平均会降低人们对错误信息的信任度;(b)对于那些更容易相信错误信息的人来说,这种影响的幅度更大;(c)无论搜索者的动机是追求定向目标还是准确目标,都能观察到认知纠正;(d)网络搜索会降低对错误信息所涉及目标群体的情感感受。本文还讨论了这些结果对网络搜索中确认偏见的稳健性以及“信念回音”的理论意义,即即使错误信息已经被有效辟谣,接触负面错误信息仍会继续影响态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85de/8457483/858642ad893b/pone.0256575.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85de/8457483/5a3dcff00979/pone.0256575.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85de/8457483/858642ad893b/pone.0256575.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85de/8457483/5a3dcff00979/pone.0256575.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85de/8457483/858642ad893b/pone.0256575.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Can "Googling" correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search.上网搜索能纠正错误信念吗?在线搜索的认知和情感后果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0256575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256575. eCollection 2021.
2
Fluid intelligence but not need for cognition is associated with attitude change in response to the correction of misinformation.流体智力而非认知需求与纠正错误信息后态度的改变有关。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Sep 18;9(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00595-1.
3
Explaining Health Misinformation Belief through News, Social, and Alternative Health Media Use: The Moderating Roles of Need for Cognition and Faith in Intuition.通过新闻、社交和另类健康媒体使用来解释健康错误信息信仰:认知需求和对直觉的信念的调节作用。
Health Commun. 2023 Jun;38(7):1416-1429. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.2010891. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Feeling angry: the effects of vaccine misinformation and refutational messages on negative emotions and vaccination attitude.感到愤怒:疫苗错误信息和反驳信息对负面情绪和疫苗接种态度的影响。
J Health Commun. 2020 Sep 1;25(9):692-702. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1838671. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
5
Intention of health experts to counter health misinformation in social media: Effects of perceived threat to online users, correction efficacy, and self-affirmation.健康专家在社交媒体上对抗健康错误信息的意图:对网络用户感知威胁、纠正效果和自我肯定的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Apr;32(3):284-303. doi: 10.1177/09636625221138357. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Stopping healthcare misinformation: The effect of financial incentives and legislation.停止医疗保健错误信息:经济激励和立法的影响。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):627-633. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Vulnerabilities to misinformation in online pharmaceutical marketing.网络药品营销中的错误信息漏洞。
J R Soc Med. 2013 May;106(5):184-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076813476679.
8
Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines.社交媒体疫苗错误信息事实核查对疫苗态度的影响。
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106408. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106408. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
9
The role of political devotion in sharing partisan misinformation and resistance to fact-checking.政治投入在分享党派错误信息和抵制事实核查方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3116-3134. doi: 10.1037/xge0001436. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
No one is immune to misinformation: An investigation of misinformation sharing by subscribers to a fact-checking newsletter.没有人能免受错误信息的影响:一项对事实核查通讯订阅者分享错误信息的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255702. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search.用户选择与更多带有党派偏见的新闻互动,而不是在谷歌搜索中接触到的新闻。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7964):342-348. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06078-5. Epub 2023 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
2
Manipulating Google's Knowledge Graph Box to Counter Biased Information Processing During an Online Search on Vaccination: Application of a Technological Debiasing Strategy.在疫苗接种在线搜索过程中操纵谷歌知识图谱框以对抗信息处理偏差:一种技术去偏策略的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 2;18(6):e137. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5430.
3
The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections.
搜索引擎操纵效应(SEME)及其对选举结果可能产生的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):E4512-21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419828112. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
4
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.错误信息及其纠正:持续影响与成功去偏倚
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Dec;13(3):106-31. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018.
5
The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output.搜索引擎选择和排序标准对疫苗接种观念及态度的影响:两项操纵谷歌搜索结果的实验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 2;16(4):e100. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2642.
6
Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.人们是因为想要相信才一直相信吗?既有态度与错误信息的持续影响。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Feb;42(2):292-304. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x.
7
Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.感觉被认可与正确:对选择性信息接触的元分析
Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;135(4):555-88. doi: 10.1037/a0015701.
8
Can cognitive biases during consumer health information searches be reduced to improve decision making?消费者健康信息搜索过程中的认知偏差能否减少以改善决策?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):54-65. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2557. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
9
Do people experience cognitive biases while searching for information?人们在搜索信息时会经历认知偏差吗?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):599-608. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2411. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
10
Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study.青少年在互联网上搜索健康信息:一项观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Oct 17;5(4):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e25.