• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流体智力而非认知需求与纠正错误信息后态度的改变有关。

Fluid intelligence but not need for cognition is associated with attitude change in response to the correction of misinformation.

机构信息

Human-Computer-Media-Institute, Psychology of Communication and New Media, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Oswald-Külpe-Weg 82, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Sep 18;9(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00595-1.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-024-00595-1
PMID:39292332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411052/
Abstract

Misinformation can profoundly impact an individual's attitudes-sometimes even after the misinformation has been corrected. In two preregistered experiments (N = 355, N = 725), we investigated whether individual differences in the ability and motivation to process information thoroughly influence the impact of misinformation in a news media context. More specifically, we tested whether fluid intelligence and need for cognition predicted the degree to which individuals who were exposed to misinformation changed their attitudes after receiving a correction message. We found consistent evidence that higher fluid intelligence is associated with a more pronounced correction effect, while need for cognition did not have a significant effect. This suggests that integrating a correction message with a previously encountered piece of misinformation can be challenging and that correction messages consequently need to be communicated in a way that is accessible to a broad audience.

摘要

错误信息可能会深刻影响一个人的态度,有时甚至在错误信息得到纠正后也是如此。在两项预先注册的实验中(N=355,N=725),我们研究了个体在信息处理能力和动机方面的差异是否会影响新闻媒体环境下错误信息的影响。更具体地说,我们测试了流体智力和认知需求是否可以预测在收到更正信息后,接触错误信息的个体改变态度的程度。我们发现一致的证据表明,较高的流体智力与更明显的纠正效果相关,而认知需求则没有显著影响。这表明,将更正信息与之前遇到的错误信息整合可能具有挑战性,因此需要以一种易于广大受众理解的方式传达更正信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/94bfab250c58/41235_2024_595_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/37db460f5380/41235_2024_595_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/29742c5c6b93/41235_2024_595_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/94bfab250c58/41235_2024_595_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/37db460f5380/41235_2024_595_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/29742c5c6b93/41235_2024_595_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ec/11411052/94bfab250c58/41235_2024_595_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fluid intelligence but not need for cognition is associated with attitude change in response to the correction of misinformation.流体智力而非认知需求与纠正错误信息后态度的改变有关。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Sep 18;9(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00595-1.
2
Can "Googling" correct misbelief? Cognitive and affective consequences of online search.上网搜索能纠正错误信念吗?在线搜索的认知和情感后果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0256575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256575. eCollection 2021.
3
Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media.错误信息来源的可信度会影响社交媒体上纠正信息的有效性。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):587-603. doi: 10.1177/09636625231215979. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
4
Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.纠正政治错误信息:在美国便利样本中,没有证据表明党派世界观有影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200145. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0145. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?错误信息的起源解释是否能提高特定纠正措施的有效性?
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):422-436. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01354-7. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
6
Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation.别信他们!通过诋毁信息源来减少错误信息的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00581-7.
7
Intraindividual strategy shifts in Raven's matrices, and their dependence on working memory capacity and need for cognition.个体在瑞文标准推理测验中的策略转变,及其对工作记忆容量和认知需求的依赖性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):564-579. doi: 10.1037/xge0000660. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间错误信息的持续影响。
Int J Psychol. 2022 Feb;57(1):136-145. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12805. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
9
Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.说服应该是情感性的还是认知性的?情感需求和认知需求的调节作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):769-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167208314871. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
10
Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: cognitive factors.错误信息导致的虚假记忆的个体差异:认知因素。
Memory. 2010 Jul;18(5):543-55. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.487051.

引用本文的文献

1
Political affiliation or need for cognition? It depends on the post: Comparing key factors related to detecting health disinformation in the U.S.政治归属还是认知需求?这取决于职位:比较与在美国检测健康虚假信息相关的关键因素
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0315259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315259. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.科学相关错误信息修正效果的元分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1514-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis.执行功能与错误信息的持续影响:潜在变量分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283951. eCollection 2023.
3
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Beliefs about the nature of knowledge shape responses to the pandemic: Epistemic beliefs, the Dark Factor of Personality, and COVID-19-related conspiracy ideation and behavior.对知识本质的信念影响人们对疫情的反应:认识信念、人格的黑暗因素,以及与 COVID-19 相关的阴谋观念和行为。
J Pers. 2022 Dec;90(6):937-955. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12706. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
The role of motivated science reception and numeracy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行背景下,激发式科学接受和计算能力的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jan;31(1):19-34. doi: 10.1177/09636625211047974. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.不适感在错误信息持续影响效应中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):435-448. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01232-8. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
7
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.你能相信吗?一项关于撤稿来源可信度对持续影响效应影响的调查。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):631-644. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01129-y. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections?在撤回之前评估信念是否会影响后续纠正的效果?
Memory. 2020 May;28(5):617-631. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1752731. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Is working memory capacity a causal factor in fluid intelligence?工作记忆容量是否是流体智力的一个因果因素?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1333-1339. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01606-9.