• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
No one is immune to misinformation: An investigation of misinformation sharing by subscribers to a fact-checking newsletter.没有人能免受错误信息的影响:一项对事实核查通讯订阅者分享错误信息的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255702. eCollection 2021.
2
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Heuristic Information Processing as a Mediating Factor in the Process of Exposure to COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Misinformation Sharing on Social Media.启发式信息处理在社交媒体上接触 COVID-19 疫苗信息和错误信息分享过程中的中介作用。
Health Commun. 2024 Nov;39(12):2779-2792. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2288373. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
5
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
6
COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.COVID-19 疫苗谣言和阴谋论:需要进行认知免疫接种以抵制错误信息,提高疫苗接种率。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251605. eCollection 2021.
7
"Thought I'd Share First" and Other Conspiracy Theory Tweets from the COVID-19 Infodemic: Exploratory Study.“我想率先分享”和其他有关 COVID-19 信息疫情的阴谋论推文:探索性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 14;7(4):e26527. doi: 10.2196/26527.
8
Testing the Efficacy of Attitudinal Inoculation Videos to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Quasi-Experimental Intervention Trial.测试态度接种视频增强 COVID-19 疫苗接受度的效果:准实验干预试验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 20;8(6):e34615. doi: 10.2196/34615.
9
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.调查和提高美国公民对新冠疫情的认知准确性:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069.
10
The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving Beyond Fact-Checking.新冠疫情错误信息泛滥:超越事实核查。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Feb;48(1):9-13. doi: 10.1177/1090198120980675. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions.阴谋叙事与疫苗犹豫:流行状况、影响及干预措施的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y.
2
Who shares fake news on social media? Evidence from vaccines and infertility claims in sub-Saharan Africa.谁在社交媒体上分享虚假新闻?来自撒哈拉以南非洲疫苗和不孕声称的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0301818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301818. eCollection 2024.
3
How cyberchondria and decision self-efficacy shapes the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine: A gender-based comparison.网络恐病症和决策自我效能如何影响新冠疫苗的可接受性:基于性别的比较
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 20;9:20552076231185430. doi: 10.1177/20552076231185430. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents.理解并打击六大洲 16 个国家的错误信息。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1502-1513. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Protocol of a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about COVID-19 vaccines and associated adverse events from vaccination.针对 COVID-19 疫苗及相关接种不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析的范围审查方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0285442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285442. eCollection 2023.
6
Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media.对与信仰一致的虚假信息持道德宽容态度,可能有助于解释其在社交媒体上的传播。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281777. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessing the Validity of Health Messages Used by the Saudi Public in WhatsApp.评估沙特公众在WhatsApp上使用的健康信息的有效性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 6;17:67-73. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S397661. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparing community mobility reduction between first and second COVID-19 waves.比较新冠疫情第一波和第二波期间社区流动性降低情况。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Oct;112:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Rev Rhum Ed Fr. 2022 Dec;89(6):555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.rhum.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
10
Who Will Help to Strive Against the "Infodemic"? Reciprocity Norms Enforce the Information Sharing Accuracy of the Individuals.谁将助力对抗“信息疫情”?互惠规范保障个体信息共享的准确性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 30;13:919321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919321. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK household longitudinal study.英国家庭纵向研究中 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的预测因素。
Brain Behav Immun. 2021 May;94:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.03.008. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates.全球对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫态度:疫苗接受率的简明系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 16;9(2):160. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9020160.
4
Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom.爱尔兰和英国与新冠疫苗犹豫及抵触相关的心理特征。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9.
5
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world.世界各地对新冠疫情错误信息的易感性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Offline: Managing the COVID-19 vaccine infodemic.线下:应对新冠疫苗信息疫情
Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32315-1.
7
Factors Predicting Willingness to Share COVID-19 Misinformation.预测分享新冠疫情错误信息意愿的因素。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:566108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566108. eCollection 2020.
8
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.依赖情感会促进对假新闻的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
9
Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments.保护消费者免受欺诈性健康声明的影响:心理驱动因素、干预措施、障碍和治疗方法的分类。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112790. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
The effects of corrective information about disease epidemics and outbreaks: Evidence from Zika and yellow fever in Brazil.疾病疫情纠正信息的影响:来自巴西寨卡和黄热病的证据。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jan 29;6(5):eaaw7449. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw7449. eCollection 2020 Jan.

没有人能免受错误信息的影响:一项对事实核查通讯订阅者分享错误信息的调查。

No one is immune to misinformation: An investigation of misinformation sharing by subscribers to a fact-checking newsletter.

机构信息

School of Health & Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

FactLab RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0255702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255702. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0255702
PMID:34375356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8354481/
Abstract

Like other disease outbreaks, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid generation and dissemination of misinformation and fake news. We investigated whether subscribers to a fact checking newsletter (n = 1397) were willing to share possible misinformation, and whether predictors of possible misinformation sharing are the same as for general samples. We also investigated predictors of willingness to have a COVID-19 vaccine and found that although vaccine acceptance was high on average, it decreased as a function of lower belief in science and higher conspiracy mentality. We found that 24% of participants had shared possible misinformation and that this was predicted by a lower belief in science. Like general samples, our participants were typically motivated to share possible misinformation due to interest in the information, or to seek a second opinion about claim veracity. However, even if information is shared in good faith and not for the purpose of deceiving or misleading others, the spread of misinformation is nevertheless highly problematic. Exposure to misinformation engenders faulty beliefs in others and undermines efforts to curtail the spread of COVID-19 by reducing adherence to social distancing measures and increasing vaccine hesitancy.

摘要

与其他疾病疫情一样,COVID-19 大流行导致了错误信息和假新闻的快速产生和传播。我们调查了订阅事实核查通讯的用户(n = 1397)是否愿意分享可能的错误信息,以及分享可能的错误信息的预测因素是否与一般样本相同。我们还调查了对 COVID-19 疫苗的接种意愿的预测因素,发现尽管平均而言疫苗接种率较高,但随着对科学的信仰降低和阴谋心态的增加而下降。我们发现,24%的参与者分享了可能的错误信息,这是由对科学的信仰较低所预测的。与一般样本一样,我们的参与者通常出于对信息的兴趣或寻求对主张真实性的第二意见而分享可能的错误信息。然而,即使信息是出于善意而不是为了欺骗或误导他人而分享的,错误信息的传播仍然是非常成问题的。接触错误信息会导致对他人产生错误的信念,并破坏通过减少对社会隔离措施的遵守和增加疫苗犹豫来遏制 COVID-19 传播的努力。