Dachner Gregory C, Kinateder Max
Brown University, 190 Thayer Street, Providence, RI, USA.
Collect Dyn. 2016;1:185-189.
Finding the way out of a building during evacuation is not an easy task. Ideally, instructions provide clear and unambiguous information to occupants about the best means to evacuate. However, many times, building occupants may find the best course of action is not always clear. Conflicting or ambiguous cues can make a process that requires a quick response, slow and possibly more dangerous. Emergency signage may be vague, conflicting with other cues, or easily overlooked. The egress route directed by signage may appear difficult to traverse or dangerous. It is crucial then to best understand how evacuees find, interpret, and act upon visual information provided by emergency signage and egress routes in emergency situations. We tested the way visual information of signage and routes is used when an occupant needs to evacuate a building. In a virtual reality experiment, conflicting visual cues were pitted against each other in order to best understand how participants use visual information.
在疏散过程中找到离开建筑物的路并非易事。理想情况下,指示会向居住者提供关于最佳疏散方式的清晰明确的信息。然而,很多时候,建筑物内的居住者可能会发现最佳行动方案并不总是清晰的。相互冲突或含糊不清的线索会使一个需要快速反应的过程变得缓慢且可能更危险。紧急标识可能模糊不清、与其他线索相互冲突或容易被忽视。标识所指示的疏散路线可能看起来难以通行或很危险。因此,至关重要的是要充分了解疏散人员在紧急情况下如何找到、解读并依据紧急标识和疏散路线所提供的视觉信息采取行动。我们测试了居住者需要疏散建筑物时,标识和路线的视觉信息是如何被使用的。在一项虚拟现实实验中,相互冲突的视觉线索相互较量,以便更好地了解参与者如何使用视觉信息。