• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物种共存和管理强度调节森林鸟类的栖息地偏好。

Species co-occurrence and management intensity modulate habitat preferences of forest birds.

机构信息

Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Biol. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01136-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12915-021-01136-8
PMID:34556096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8459526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Species co-occurrences can have profound effects on the habitat use of species, and therefore habitat structure alone cannot fully explain observed abundances. To account for this aspect of community organization, we developed multi-species abundance models, incorporating the local effect of co-occurring and potentially associated species, alongside with environmental predictors, linked mainly to forest management intensity. We coupled it with a landscape-scale analysis to further examine the role of management intensity in modifying the habitat preferences in connection with the landscape context. Using empirical data from the Black Forest in southern Germany, we focused on the forest bird assemblage and in particular on the cavity-nesting and canopy-foraging guilds. We included in the analysis species that co-occur and for which evidence suggests association is likely.

RESULTS

Our findings show that the local effect of species associations can mitigate the effects of management intensity on forest birds. We also found that bird species express wider habitat preferences in forests under higher management intensity, depending on the landscape context.

CONCLUSIONS

We suspect that species associations may facilitate the utilization of a broader range of environmental conditions under intensive forest management, which benefits some species over others. Networks of associations may be a relevant factor in the effectiveness of conservation-oriented forest management.

摘要

背景

物种共存对物种的栖息地利用有深远的影响,因此仅靠栖息地结构无法完全解释观察到的丰度。为了考虑到群落组织的这一方面,我们开发了多物种丰度模型,将共存和潜在相关物种的局部效应与环境预测因子结合起来,这些预测因子主要与森林管理强度有关。我们将其与景观尺度分析相结合,进一步研究管理强度在改变与景观背景相关的栖息地偏好方面的作用。利用来自德国南部黑森林的实证数据,我们专注于森林鸟类组合,特别是树洞巢和树冠觅食的鸟类。我们在分析中纳入了共存的物种,并有证据表明它们之间可能存在关联。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,物种关联的局部效应可以减轻管理强度对森林鸟类的影响。我们还发现,取决于景观背景,鸟类在管理强度较高的森林中表现出更广泛的栖息地偏好。

结论

我们怀疑物种关联可能有助于在密集的森林管理下利用更广泛的环境条件,这使某些物种受益于其他物种。关联网络可能是面向保护的森林管理有效性的一个相关因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/55d29d3408b0/12915_2021_1136_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/9ae6573fc342/12915_2021_1136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/d9b82ee089d4/12915_2021_1136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/016958af3cbf/12915_2021_1136_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/b660012acf6d/12915_2021_1136_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/503d793fec52/12915_2021_1136_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/d5e3cd0a73f3/12915_2021_1136_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/55d29d3408b0/12915_2021_1136_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/9ae6573fc342/12915_2021_1136_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/d9b82ee089d4/12915_2021_1136_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/016958af3cbf/12915_2021_1136_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/b660012acf6d/12915_2021_1136_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/503d793fec52/12915_2021_1136_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/d5e3cd0a73f3/12915_2021_1136_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9795/8459526/55d29d3408b0/12915_2021_1136_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Species co-occurrence and management intensity modulate habitat preferences of forest birds.物种共存和管理强度调节森林鸟类的栖息地偏好。
BMC Biol. 2021 Sep 23;19(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01136-8.
2
Developing fine-grained nationwide predictions of valuable forests using biodiversity indicator bird species.利用指示鸟类物种开发有价值森林的精细全国预测。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Mar;32(2):e2505. doi: 10.1002/eap.2505. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Dry conifer forest restoration benefits Colorado Front Range avian communities.干针叶林恢复有益于科罗拉多前缘山脉的鸟类群落。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Sep;30(6):e02142. doi: 10.1002/eap.2142. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
4
The importance of agricultural lands for Himalayan birds in winter.农业用地对喜马拉雅山脉鸟类冬季生存的重要性。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):416-426. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12812. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Logging impacts on avian species richness and composition differ across latitudes and foraging and breeding habitat preferences.纬度以及觅食和繁殖生境偏好的不同会导致鸟类物种丰富度和组成的记录产生差异。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1657-1674. doi: 10.1111/brv.12300. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
6
Simulated treatment effects on bird communities inform landscape-scale dry conifer forest management.模拟处理对鸟类群落的影响为景观尺度的干针叶林管理提供信息。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jun;32(4):e2555. doi: 10.1002/eap.2555. Epub 2022 Apr 24.
7
Forest structure, plants, arthropods, scale, or birds' functional groups: What key factor are forest birds responding to?森林结构、植物、节肢动物、鳞片或鸟类功能群:森林鸟类对什么关键因素做出反应?
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304421. eCollection 2024.
8
Rare species disproportionally contribute to functional diversity in managed forests.珍稀物种不成比例地为管理森林的功能多样性做出贡献。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09624-9.
9
Species-specific responses to habitat conversion across scales synergistically restructure Neotropical bird communities.物种特异性对跨尺度生境转换的响应协同地重构了新热带鸟类群落。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Jul;29(5):e01910. doi: 10.1002/eap.1910. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Diversification of forest management regimes secures tree microhabitats and bird abundance under climate change.森林管理模式的多样化确保了树木微生境和鸟类数量在气候变化下的稳定。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2717-2730. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.366. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Forest fragmentation and heterogeneity shape the occurrence of woodpecker species in Central Europe.森林破碎化和异质性塑造了中欧啄木鸟物种的分布。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04832-5.
2
Forest structure, plants, arthropods, scale, or birds' functional groups: What key factor are forest birds responding to?森林结构、植物、节肢动物、鳞片或鸟类功能群:森林鸟类对什么关键因素做出反应?
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304421. eCollection 2024.
3
Refining manual annotation effort of acoustic data to estimate bird species richness and composition: The role of duration, intensity, and time.

本文引用的文献

1
Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests.温带山地森林管理强度、碳储量和净初级生产力对生物多样性的响应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80499-4.
2
Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions.共生并不意味着存在生态相互作用。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Jul;23(7):1050-1063. doi: 10.1111/ele.13525. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?
优化声学数据的人工标注工作以估计鸟类物种丰富度和组成:时长、强度和时间的作用
Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e9491. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9491. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Titmice are a better indicator of bird density in Northern European than in Western European forests.在北欧森林中,山雀比在西欧森林中更能体现鸟类密度。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 12;12(2):e8479. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8479. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Spatial Behavior and Habitat Use of Two Sympatric Bat Species.两种同域分布蝙蝠物种的空间行为与栖息地利用
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 5;11(12):3460. doi: 10.3390/ani11123460.
树木相关的小生境能告诉我们关于森林栖息的蝙蝠、鸟类和昆虫的丰富度的什么信息?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110401. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110401. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
Evaluating the effectiveness of retention forestry to enhance biodiversity in production forests of Central Europe using an interdisciplinary, multi-scale approach.采用跨学科、多尺度方法评估中欧生产林中的保留林业对增强生物多样性的有效性。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 14;10(3):1489-1509. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6003. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe.作为一种综合的生物多样性保护方法,留地保护在欧洲的连续性覆盖林业中得到了应用。
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01190-1. Epub 2019 May 4.
6
Diversification of forest management regimes secures tree microhabitats and bird abundance under climate change.森林管理模式的多样化确保了树木微生境和鸟类数量在气候变化下的稳定。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2717-2730. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.366. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Competition-driven niche segregation on a landscape scale: Evidence for escaping from syntopy towards allotopy in two coexisting sibling passerine species.竞争驱动的景观尺度生态位隔离:两种共存的雀形目鸟类从同域分布到异域分布的证据。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 May;87(3):774-789. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12808. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Seasonality and microhabitat selection in a forest-dwelling salamander.一种栖息于森林的蝾螈的季节性与微生境选择
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Sep 12;104(9-10):80. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1500-6.
9
Should Environmental Filtering be Abandoned?是否应该摒弃环境过滤?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun;32(6):429-437. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
10
Niche Contractions in Declining Species: Mechanisms and Consequences.衰退物种中的生态位收缩:机制与后果。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 May;32(5):346-355. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 8.