Suppr超能文献

正畸治疗开始6个月后的根尖外吸收:一项比较固定矫治器和正畸矫治器的随机临床试验

External apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of orthodontic treatment: A randomized clinical trial comparing fixed appliances and orthodontic aligners.

作者信息

Toyokawa-Sperandio Katia Cristina, Conti Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira, Fernandes Thais Maria Freire, Almeida-Pedrin Renata Rodrigues de, Almeida Marcio Rodrigues de, Oltramari Paula Vanessa Pedron

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of North Parana (UNOPAR), Londrina, Brazil.

出版信息

Korean J Orthod. 2021 Sep 25;51(5):329-336. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.5.329.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the magnitude of external apical root resorption (EARR) 6 months after starting orthodontic treatment using orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs).

METHODS

This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 patients randomized into two groups: OA group (n = 20, 160 incisors) and FA group (n = 20, 160 incisors). For evaluation of the tooth length, periapical radiographs and standardized linear measurements of the maxillary and mandibular incisors were acquired before (T0) and 6 months after treatment initiation (T1). EARR was calculated through the difference in length between the two time points (T1-T0). Statistical comparisons were performed by means of using -tests, chi-squared test and covariance analysis (a = 5%).

RESULTS

Rounding of the root apex was observed in both groups; the resorption involved 2.88% of the root length, so 97.12% of the tooth length remained intact. Intragroup comparisons between the two time points revealed a significant difference, with (T1-T0) ranging from -0.52 to -0.88 mm in the FA group and from -0.52 to -0.85 mm in the OA group. In the intergroup comparisons, only tooth #21 presented a statistically significant difference (OA: -0.52 ± 0.57 mm, FA: -0.86 ± 0.60 mm); however, the overall differences between groups were not clinically relevant, ranging from 0.03 to 0.35 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

OA and FA treatment resulted in a similar degree of EARR in the maxillary and mandibular incisors at 6 months after treatment initiation. However, the amount of resorption was small and does not impair tooth longevity.

摘要

目的

比较使用正畸矫治器(OA)和固定矫治器(FA)开始正畸治疗6个月后根尖外吸收(EARR)的程度。

方法

这项平行随机临床试验纳入了40例患者,随机分为两组:OA组(n = 20,160颗切牙)和FA组(n = 20,160颗切牙)。为评估牙长,在治疗开始前(T0)和治疗开始6个月后(T1)获取上颌和下颌切牙的根尖片及标准化线性测量值。通过两个时间点之间的长度差异(T1 - T0)计算EARR。采用t检验、卡方检验和协方差分析进行统计学比较(α = 5%)。

结果

两组均观察到根尖圆钝;吸收累及牙根长度的2.88%,因此97.12%的牙长保持完整。两个时间点的组内比较显示有显著差异,FA组(T1 - T0)范围为 - 0.52至 - 0.88 mm,OA组为 - 0.52至 - 0.85 mm。组间比较中,仅21号牙有统计学显著差异(OA: - 0.52 ± 0.57 mm,FA: - 0.86 ± 0.60 mm);然而,组间总体差异在临床上无相关性,范围为0.03至0.35 mm。

结论

治疗开始6个月时,OA和FA治疗在上颌和下颌切牙中导致的EARR程度相似。然而,吸收量较小,不影响牙齿寿命。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec02/8461388/37f4d320aff9/kjod-51-5-329-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验