Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Center for Liver Diseases, Thomas A. Starzl Transplantation Institute and Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Jan;6(1):237-246. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1796. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
Physical frailty and impaired cognition are common in patients with cirrhosis. Physical frailty can be assessed using performance-based tests, but the extent to which impaired cognition may impact performance is not well characterized. We assessed the relationship between impaired cognition and physical frailty in patients with cirrhosis. We enrolled 1,623 ambulatory adult patients with cirrhosis waiting for liver transplantation at 10 sites. Frailty was assessed with the liver frailty index (LFI; "frail," LFI ≥ 4.4). Cognition was assessed at the same visit with the number connection test (NCT); continuous "impaired cognition" was examined in primary analysis, with longer NCT (more seconds) indicating worse impaired cognition. For descriptive statistics, "impaired cognition" was NCT ≥ 45 seconds. Linear regression associated frailty and impaired cognition; competing risk regression estimated subhazard ratios (sHRs) of wait-list mortality (i.e., death/delisting for sickness). Median NCT was 41 seconds, and 42% had impaired cognition. Median LFI (4.2 vs. 3.8) and rates of frailty (38% vs. 20%) differed between those with and without impaired cognition. In adjusted analysis, every 10-second NCT increase associated with a 0.08-LFI increase (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.10). In univariable analysis, both frailty (sHR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.43-1.87) and impaired cognition (sHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10) associated with wait-list mortality. After adjustment, frailty but not impaired cognition remained significantly associated with wait-list mortality (sHR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.33-1.79). Impaired cognition mediated 7.4% (95% CI, 2.0%-16.4%) of the total effect of frailty on 1-year wait-list mortality. Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis with higher impaired cognition displayed higher rates of physical frailty, yet frailty independently associated with wait-list mortality while impaired cognition did not. Our data provide evidence for using the LFI to understand mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis, even when concurrent impaired cognition varies.
身体虚弱和认知障碍在肝硬化患者中很常见。身体虚弱可以通过基于表现的测试来评估,但认知障碍对表现的影响程度尚不清楚。我们评估了肝硬化患者认知障碍与身体虚弱之间的关系。我们在 10 个地点招募了 1623 名等待肝移植的门诊成年肝硬化患者。使用肝虚弱指数(LFI;“虚弱”,LFI≥4.4)评估虚弱程度。认知功能在同一就诊时通过数字连接测试(NCT)进行评估;在主要分析中,连续的“认知障碍”进行了检查,NCT 时间较长(更多秒)表明认知障碍更严重。对于描述性统计,“认知障碍”是 NCT≥45 秒。线性回归将虚弱和认知障碍相关联;竞争风险回归估计等待名单死亡率(即死亡/因疾病被除名)的亚危险比(sHR)。中位数 NCT 为 41 秒,42%的患者存在认知障碍。有认知障碍的患者中位数 LFI(4.2 与 3.8)和虚弱率(38%与 20%)不同。在调整分析中,NCT 每增加 10 秒,LFI 增加 0.08(95%置信区间[CI],0.07-0.10)。在单变量分析中,虚弱(sHR,1.63;95%CI,1.43-1.87)和认知障碍(sHR,1.07;95%CI,1.04-1.10)均与等待名单死亡率相关。调整后,只有虚弱与等待名单死亡率显著相关(sHR,1.55;95%CI,1.33-1.79),而认知障碍则不然。认知障碍介导了虚弱对 1 年等待名单死亡率的总影响的 7.4%(95%CI,2.0%-16.4%)。结论:认知障碍程度较高的肝硬化患者表现出更高的身体虚弱率,但虚弱与等待名单死亡率独立相关,而认知障碍则不然。我们的数据为使用 LFI 来了解肝硬化患者的死亡风险提供了证据,即使同时存在认知障碍变化也是如此。