Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Department of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA; Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
J Invertebr Pathol. 2021 Oct;185:107667. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2021.107667. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Managed and wild bee populations are in decline around the globe due to several biotic and abiotic stressors. Pathogenic viruses associated with the Western honey bee (Apis mellifera) have been identified as key contributors to losses of managed honey bee colonies, and are known to be transmitted to wild bee populations through shared floral resources. However, little is known about the prevalence and intensity of these viruses in wild bee populations, or how bee visitation to flowers impacts viral transmission in agroecosystems. This study surveyed honey bee, bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) and wild squash bee (Eucera (Peponapis) pruinosa) populations in Cucurbita agroecosystems across Pennsylvania (USA) for the prevalence and intensity of five honey bee viruses: acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), deformed wing virus (DWV), Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV), Kashmir bee virus (KBV), and slow bee paralysis virus (SBPV). We investigated the potential role of bee visitation rate to flowers on DWV intensity among species in the pollinator community, with the expectation that increased bee visitation to flowers would increase the opportunity for transmission events between host species. We found that honey bee viruses are highly prevalent but in lower titers in wild E. pruinosa and B. impatiens than in A. mellifera populations throughout Pennsylvania (USA). DWV was detected in 88% of B. impatiens, 48% of E. pruinosa, and 95% of A. mellifera. IAPV was detected in 5% of B. impatiens and 4% of E. pruinosa, compared to 9% in A. mellifera. KBV was detected in 1% of B. impatiens and 5% of E. pruinosa, compared to 32% in A. mellifera. Our results indicate that DWV titers are not correlated with bee visitation in Cucurbita fields. The potential fitness impacts of these low viral titers detected in E. pruinosa remain to be investigated.
由于多种生物和非生物胁迫因素,全球范围内管理和野生蜜蜂种群数量正在下降。与西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)相关的致病性病毒已被确定为管理不善的蜜蜂种群损失的主要原因,并已知通过共享花卉资源传播到野生蜜蜂种群。然而,对于这些病毒在野生蜜蜂种群中的流行程度和强度,以及蜜蜂对花卉的访问如何影响农业生态系统中的病毒传播,知之甚少。本研究在美国宾夕法尼亚州的 Cucurbita 农业生态系统中调查了蜜蜂、熊蜂(Bombus impatiens)和野生南瓜蜂(Eucera (Peponapis) pruinosa)种群,以调查五种蜜蜂病毒的流行程度和强度:急性麻痹病毒(ABPV)、变形翅膀病毒(DWV)、以色列急性麻痹病毒(IAPV)、卡什米尔蜜蜂病毒(KBV)和缓慢麻痹病毒(SBPV)。我们研究了蜜蜂对花卉的访问率对授粉者群落中物种 DWV 强度的潜在作用,预计增加蜜蜂对花卉的访问会增加宿主物种之间传播事件的机会。我们发现,在整个宾夕法尼亚州(美国),野生 E. pruinosa 和 B. impatiens 中的蜜蜂病毒高度流行,但滴度低于 A. mellifera 种群。DWV 在 88%的 B. impatiens、48%的 E. pruinosa 和 95%的 A. mellifera 中被检测到。IAPV 在 5%的 B. impatiens 和 4%的 E. pruinosa 中被检测到,而在 9%的 A. mellifera 中被检测到。KBV 在 1%的 B. impatiens 和 5%的 E. pruinosa 中被检测到,而在 32%的 A. mellifera 中被检测到。我们的结果表明,在 Cucurbita 田间,DWV 滴度与蜜蜂访问量无关。E. pruinosa 中检测到的这些低病毒滴度对其适应度的潜在影响仍有待研究。