• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络中的习惯效应可能是无声地削弱影响力最大化努力的潜在因素。

Habituation effect in social networks as a potential factor silently crushing influence maximisation efforts.

机构信息

Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-210, Szczecin, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 24;11(1):19055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98493-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-98493-9
PMID:34561501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8463708/
Abstract

Information spreading processes are a key phenomenon observed within real and digital social networks. Network members are often under pressure from incoming information with different sources, such as informative campaigns for increasing awareness, viral marketing, rumours, fake news, or the results of other activities. Messages are often repeated, and such repetition can improve performance in the form of cumulative influence. Repeated messages may also be ignored due to a limited ability to process information. Learning processes are leading to the repeated messages being ignored, as their content has already been absorbed. In such cases, responsiveness decreases with repetition, and the habituation effect can be observed. Here, we analyse spreading processes while considering the habituation effect and performance drop along with an increased number of contacts. The ability to recover when reducing the number of messages is also considered. The results show that even low habituation and a decrease in propagation probability may substantially impact network coverage. This can lead to a significant reduction in the potential for a seed set selected with an influence maximisation method. Apart from the impact of the habituation effect on spreading processes, we show how it can be reduced with the use of the sequential seeding approach. This shows that sequential seeding is less sensitive to the habituation effect than single-stage seeding, and that it can be used to limit the negative impact on users overloaded with incoming messages.

摘要

信息传播过程是真实和数字社交网络中观察到的关键现象。网络成员经常受到来自不同来源的信息的压力,例如提高意识的信息活动、病毒式营销、谣言、假新闻或其他活动的结果。信息经常被重复,这种重复可以以累积影响的形式提高性能。由于信息处理能力有限,重复的信息也可能被忽略。学习过程导致重复的信息被忽略,因为它们的内容已经被吸收。在这种情况下,响应能力会随着重复而下降,并且可以观察到习惯化效应。在这里,我们在考虑习惯化效应和随着接触次数增加而性能下降的情况下分析传播过程。还考虑了减少信息数量时恢复的能力。结果表明,即使习惯化程度低且传播概率降低,也可能对网络覆盖范围产生重大影响。这可能导致通过影响力最大化方法选择的种子集的潜力显著降低。除了习惯化效应对传播过程的影响外,我们还展示了如何通过使用顺序播种方法来减少这种影响。这表明顺序播种比单阶段播种对习惯化效应的敏感性更低,并且可以用于限制对过载的用户的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f099/8463708/130d2f3bcca3/41598_2021_98493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f099/8463708/130d2f3bcca3/41598_2021_98493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f099/8463708/130d2f3bcca3/41598_2021_98493_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Habituation effect in social networks as a potential factor silently crushing influence maximisation efforts.社交网络中的习惯效应可能是无声地削弱影响力最大化努力的潜在因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 24;11(1):19055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98493-9.
2
Modeling the impact of the habituation effect on information spreading processes with repeated contacts under an SI model.在 SI 模型下,通过重复接触模拟习惯化效应对信息传播过程的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0280266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280266. eCollection 2023.
3
Repetition of Computer Security Warnings Results in Differential Repetition Suppression Effects as Revealed With Functional MRI.功能性磁共振成像显示,计算机安全警告的重复会导致不同的重复抑制效应。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 7;11:528079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.528079. eCollection 2020.
4
Balancing Speed and Coverage by Sequential Seeding in Complex Networks.复杂网络中通过顺序播种平衡速度与覆盖范围
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 18;7(1):891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00937-8.
5
Sequential seeding in multilayer networks.多层网络中的顺序播种
Chaos. 2021 Mar;31(3):033130. doi: 10.1063/5.0023427.
6
Graph global attention network with memory: A deep learning approach for fake news detection.图全局注意力网络与记忆:用于虚假新闻检测的深度学习方法。
Neural Netw. 2024 Apr;172:106115. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106115. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
7
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
8
Topic selectivity and adaptivity promote spreading of short messages.主题选择性和适应性促进短消息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 19;12(1):15655. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19719-y.
9
Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.重复接触对社交网络中信息传播的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140556. eCollection 2015.
10
Novel approaches to fake news and fake account detection in OSNs: user social engagement and visual content centric model.社交网络中虚假新闻和虚假账户检测的新方法:以用户社交参与度和视觉内容为中心的模型
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00878-9. Epub 2022 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A new stochastic diffusion model for influence maximization in social networks.一种用于社交网络中影响最大化的新随机扩散模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 14;13(1):6122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33010-8.
2
Modeling the impact of the habituation effect on information spreading processes with repeated contacts under an SI model.在 SI 模型下,通过重复接触模拟习惯化效应对信息传播过程的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0280266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280266. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
How predictability affects habituation to novelty.可预测性如何影响对新奇事物的习惯化。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0237278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237278. eCollection 2021.
2
Information diffusion backbones in temporal networks.时间网络中的信息扩散骨干
Sci Rep. 2019 May 1;9(1):6798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43029-5.
3
Probing Limits of Information Spread with Sequential Seeding.序贯播种探测信息传播极限。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 18;8(1):13996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32081-2.
4
Balancing Speed and Coverage by Sequential Seeding in Complex Networks.复杂网络中通过顺序播种平衡速度与覆盖范围
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 18;7(1):891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00937-8.
5
Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.重复接触对社交网络中信息传播的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140556. eCollection 2015.
6
Models of epidemics: when contact repetition and clustering should be included.流行病模型:何时应纳入接触重复和聚集性因素
Theor Biol Med Model. 2009 Jun 29;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-6-11.
7
The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks.意识的传播及其对疫情爆发的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6872-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810762106. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
8
Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation.重温习惯化:对习惯化行为特征的更新与修订描述。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Sep;92(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
9
Habituation: a history.习惯化:一段经历。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Sep;92(2):127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
10
Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information.病毒式传播?听到风声了?为公共卫生从业者和研究人员提供的指南,介绍网络2.0如何颠覆广告限制并传播健康信息。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Sep;62(9):778-82. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.073759.