• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复接触对社交网络中信息传播的影响。

Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.

作者信息

Zhou Cangqi, Zhao Qianchuan, Lu Wenbo

机构信息

Center for Intelligent and Networked Systems (CFINS), Department of Automation and TNList, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140556. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140556
PMID:26465749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4605739/
Abstract

Clustered structure of social networks provides the chances of repeated exposures to carriers with similar information. It is commonly believed that the impact of repeated exposures on the spreading of information is nontrivial. Does this effect increase the probability that an individual forwards a message in social networks? If so, to what extent does this effect influence people's decisions on whether or not to spread information? Based on a large-scale microblogging data set, which logs the message spreading processes and users' forwarding activities, we conduct a data-driven analysis to explore the answer to the above questions. The results show that an overwhelming majority of message samples are more probable to be forwarded under repeated exposures, compared to those under only a single exposure. For those message samples that cover various topics, we observe a relatively fixed, topic-independent multiplier of the willingness of spreading when repeated exposures occur, regardless of the differences in network structure. We believe that this finding reflects average people's intrinsic psychological gain under repeated stimuli. Hence, it makes sense that the gain is associated with personal response behavior, rather than network structure. Moreover, we find that the gain is robust against the change of message popularity. This finding supports that there exists a relatively fixed gain brought by repeated exposures. Based on the above findings, we propose a parsimonious model to predict the saturated numbers of forwarding activities of messages. Our work could contribute to better understandings of behavioral psychology and social media analytics.

摘要

社交网络的聚集结构提供了反复接触携带相似信息者的机会。人们普遍认为,反复接触对信息传播的影响并非微不足道。这种影响会增加个体在社交网络中转发消息的概率吗?如果是这样,这种影响在多大程度上会影响人们关于是否传播信息的决策?基于一个记录了消息传播过程和用户转发活动的大规模微博数据集,我们进行了数据驱动的分析来探索上述问题的答案。结果表明,与仅单次接触的消息样本相比,绝大多数消息样本在反复接触下更有可能被转发。对于那些涵盖各种主题的消息样本,我们观察到当反复接触发生时,无论网络结构存在差异,传播意愿都有一个相对固定的、与主题无关的乘数。我们认为这一发现反映了普通人在反复刺激下的内在心理收益。因此,这种收益与个人反应行为而非网络结构相关是有道理的。此外,我们发现这种收益对消息热度的变化具有鲁棒性。这一发现支持反复接触会带来相对固定的收益。基于上述发现,我们提出了一个简约模型来预测消息转发活动的饱和数量。我们的工作有助于更好地理解行为心理学和社交媒体分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/74cebc525f6f/pone.0140556.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/7c02e3769403/pone.0140556.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/6af8dbbca022/pone.0140556.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/320e4debe807/pone.0140556.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/d847e9b7dfd8/pone.0140556.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/367fa4c4e355/pone.0140556.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/0e1d461f6c01/pone.0140556.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/7d29a9dd3975/pone.0140556.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/3705e22911b0/pone.0140556.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/74cebc525f6f/pone.0140556.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/7c02e3769403/pone.0140556.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/6af8dbbca022/pone.0140556.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/320e4debe807/pone.0140556.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/d847e9b7dfd8/pone.0140556.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/367fa4c4e355/pone.0140556.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/0e1d461f6c01/pone.0140556.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/7d29a9dd3975/pone.0140556.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/3705e22911b0/pone.0140556.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/4605739/74cebc525f6f/pone.0140556.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Repeated Exposures on Information Spreading in Social Networks.重复接触对社交网络中信息传播的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140556. eCollection 2015.
2
Cumulative effect in information diffusion: empirical study on a microblogging network.信息扩散中的累积效应:对一个微博网络的实证研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 1;8(10):e76027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076027. eCollection 2013.
3
Detecting the influence of spreading in social networks with excitable sensor networks.利用易兴奋传感器网络检测社交网络中的传播影响。
PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0124848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124848. eCollection 2015.
4
Cumulative Dynamics of Independent Information Spreading Behaviour: A Physical Perspective.独立信息传播行为的累积动力学:物理视角。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05899-5.
5
Mention effect in information diffusion on a micro-blogging network.提及微博网络中信息传播的提及效应。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194192. eCollection 2018.
6
Factors affecting the spread of multiple information in social networks.影响社交网络中多元信息传播的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0225751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225751. eCollection 2019.
7
Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.社交网络中的病毒式传播预测和社区结构。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2522. doi: 10.1038/srep02522.
8
Users' participation and social influence during information spreading on Twitter.推特上信息传播过程中的用户参与度与社会影响力。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183290. eCollection 2017.
9
Social contagions on time-varying community networks.时变社区网络上的社交传染。
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052306. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media.在现实世界的社交媒体中寻找信息的超级传播者。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 3;4:5547. doi: 10.1038/srep05547.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Common Diabetes Mellitus Misinformation Exposure, Cognitive Attitude, and Intention to Share Information Among Patients in a Primary Care Unit.基层医疗单位患者中常见糖尿病错误信息暴露、认知态度及信息分享意愿的患病率
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;13(14):1762. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141762.
2
How persuasive is AI-generated propaganda?人工智能生成的宣传内容有多有说服力?
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Feb 20;3(2):pgae034. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae034. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Modeling the impact of the habituation effect on information spreading processes with repeated contacts under an SI model.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative effect in information diffusion: empirical study on a microblogging network.信息扩散中的累积效应:对一个微博网络的实证研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 1;8(10):e76027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076027. eCollection 2013.
2
Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.社交网络中的病毒式传播预测和社区结构。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2522. doi: 10.1038/srep02522.
3
Spreading in online social networks: the role of social reinforcement.在线社交网络中的传播:社会强化的作用。
在 SI 模型下,通过重复接触模拟习惯化效应对信息传播过程的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0280266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280266. eCollection 2023.
4
Habituation effect in social networks as a potential factor silently crushing influence maximisation efforts.社交网络中的习惯效应可能是无声地削弱影响力最大化努力的潜在因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 24;11(1):19055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98493-9.
5
Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore.评估一项针对新加坡野生动物产品消费者的大规模在线行为改变干预措施。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248144. eCollection 2021.
6
Use of a controlled experiment and computational models to measure the impact of sequential peer exposures on decision making.使用对照实验和计算模型来衡量连续同伴接触对决策的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0234875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234875. eCollection 2020.
7
Cumulative Dynamics of Independent Information Spreading Behaviour: A Physical Perspective.独立信息传播行为的累积动力学:物理视角。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05899-5.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jul;88(1):012818. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012818. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
4
Structural diversity in social contagion.社会传播中的结构多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):5962-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116502109. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
5
The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.通过在线网络进行抗议招募的动态。
Sci Rep. 2011;1:197. doi: 10.1038/srep00197. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Leaders in social networks, the Delicious case.社交网络中的领导者,美味书签案例。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021202. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
7
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.在线社交网络实验中的行为传播。
Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1194-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231.
8
Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization.脸书个人资料反映的是真实个性,而非自我理想化。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):372-4. doi: 10.1177/0956797609360756. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
9
Entertainment-education in a media-saturated environment: examining the impact of single and multiple exposures to breast cancer storylines on two popular medical dramas.媒体饱和环境下的娱乐教育:探究单次和多次接触乳腺癌故事情节对两部热门医疗剧的影响
J Health Commun. 2008 Dec;13(8):808-23. doi: 10.1080/10810730802487471.
10
Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system.通过测量社会系统的响应函数揭示的稳健动态类别。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):15649-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803685105. Epub 2008 Sep 29.