Suppr超能文献

比较 12 小时和 24 小时轮班对 ICU 护理、效率、安全和工作生活质量的影响。

Comparison of 12 and 24-hours shift impacts on ICU nursing care, efficiency, safety, and work-life quality.

机构信息

Deputy Director, Department of Hospital Services, Chief Nursing and Midwifery Officer in Cambodia for WHO-WPRO, Postdoctoral Researcher, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Mar;69(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/inr.12715. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing care quality is a central concern of health policy, and nurses' shift schedules affect the quality of care and their work-life status internationally. A lack of reliable information on the differences between 24- and 12-h shifts on care quality, nursing care quality, patient safety, and adverse and missed events warranted investigation in Cambodia.

AIM

We aimed to examine the impacts of 12-h shifts compared with 24-h shifts. The purpose was to find evidence to support the use of maximum 12-h shifts by registered nurses working in ICU contexts.

METHOD

A convergent mixed-method approach was chosen to highlight the issues around the long hours of shift work. We designed a 12-week coaching course during the implementation of 12-h shifts and assigned 30 nurses each to an experimental group and a control group. Data from quantitative surveying of 58 participants were combined with focus group discussions of 20 participants to gather qualitative insights. Pre- and post-test analysis involved descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon sign rank test for quantitative analysis and then merged with qualitative findings from content analysis. Reporting of this study was steered by the STROBE and COREQ guidelines for quantitative and qualitative findings, respectively.

RESULTS

Quantitative results showed the increased quality of nursing work-life, nursing care quality, and patient satisfaction; decreased missed care and adverse events were significantly associated with the 12-h shift. Qualitative data supported nurses preferring 12-h rather than 24-h shift options.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Changing rosters to 12-h shifts in the intervention caused increases in the study variables' scores. Results indicate the benefits of 12-h shifts on the quality of nursing work-life, nursing care quality, missed care, adverse events, and patient safety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND NURSING POLICY

We found that 24-h shifts had deleterious impacts on care quality and safety and nurse satisfaction with work. Health and nursing policymakers are urged to provide resources and strategize to implement 12 h shifts as soon as possible since the current 24-h shifts of nurses affect the patient quality of care and their health and safety and that of the nurses.

摘要

背景

护理质量是卫生政策的核心关注点,护士的轮班时间安排在国际范围内影响着护理质量和她们的工作生活状况。由于缺乏关于 24 小时和 12 小时轮班制在护理质量、护理安全、不良事件和遗漏事件方面差异的可靠信息,因此有必要在柬埔寨进行调查。

目的

我们旨在研究 12 小时轮班制与 24 小时轮班制相比的影响。目的是找到证据支持在 ICU 环境中工作的注册护士最多使用 12 小时轮班制。

方法

采用收敛混合方法来突出轮班时间长带来的问题。我们在实施 12 小时轮班制期间设计了一个为期 12 周的辅导课程,并将 30 名护士分配到实验组和对照组。对 58 名参与者进行定量调查的数据与 20 名参与者的焦点小组讨论相结合,以收集定性见解。定量分析包括预测试和后测试的描述性统计和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,然后与内容分析的定性结果合并。本研究的报告分别遵循 STROBE 和 COREQ 指南进行定量和定性结果的报告。

结果

定量结果表明,护理工作生活质量、护理质量和患者满意度提高;漏诊和不良事件减少与 12 小时轮班显著相关。定性数据支持护士更喜欢 12 小时而不是 24 小时轮班。

讨论与结论

干预组将轮班制改为 12 小时轮班制,导致研究变量的得分增加。结果表明,12 小时轮班制对护理工作生活质量、护理质量、漏诊、不良事件和患者安全都有好处。

对护理和护理政策的影响

我们发现 24 小时轮班对护理质量和安全以及护士对工作的满意度有不利影响。卫生和护理政策制定者被敦促提供资源并制定策略,尽快实施 12 小时轮班制,因为目前护士的 24 小时轮班制影响患者的护理质量和他们的健康和安全,以及护士的健康和安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验