• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从活化部分凝血活酶时间到抗因子 Xa 及再回到活化部分凝血活酶时间。

From Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Antifactor Xa and Back Again.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2022 Mar 3;157(3):321-327. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab135.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqab135
PMID:34562001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8891818/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Monitoring is essential to safe anticoagulation prescribing and requires close collaboration among pathologists, clinicians, and pharmacists.

METHODS

We describe our experience in the evolving strategy for laboratory testing of unfractionated heparin (UFH).

RESULTS

An intrainstitutional investigation revealed significant discordance between activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) assays, prompting a transition from the former to the latter in 2013. With the increasing use of oral factor Xa inhibitors (eg, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, betrixaban), which interfere with the anti-Xa assay, we adapted our protocol again to incorporate aPTT in patients admitted on oral Xa inhibitors who require transition to UFH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates key challenges in anticoagulation and highlights the importance of clinical pathologists in helping health systems adapt to the changing anticoagulation landscape.

摘要

目的

监测对于安全的抗凝药物处方至关重要,需要病理学家、临床医生和药剂师之间密切合作。

方法

我们描述了我们在未分级肝素(UFH)实验室检测不断发展的策略方面的经验。

结果

一项院内调查显示,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和抗因子 Xa(anti-Xa)检测之间存在显著差异,这促使我们在 2013 年从前者过渡到后者。随着口服因子 Xa 抑制剂(如阿哌沙班、利伐沙班、依度沙班、贝曲沙班)的使用越来越多,这些抑制剂会干扰抗-Xa 检测,因此我们再次调整了方案,在需要从口服 Xa 抑制剂转换为 UFH 的口服 Xa 抑制剂入院患者中纳入 aPTT。

结论

我们的经验表明抗凝治疗存在关键挑战,并强调了临床病理学家在帮助卫生系统适应不断变化的抗凝治疗领域中的重要性。

相似文献

1
From Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Antifactor Xa and Back Again.从活化部分凝血活酶时间到抗因子 Xa 及再回到活化部分凝血活酶时间。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2022 Mar 3;157(3):321-327. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab135.
2
Antifactor Xa levels vs. activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. A pilot study.抗Xa因子水平与活化部分凝血活酶时间用于监测普通肝素:一项初步研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Oct;41(5):499-502. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12415. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
3
The PiCT test is a reliable alternative to the activated partial thromboplastin time in unfractionated heparin therapy management: results from a multicenter study.PiCT 检测在非分级肝素治疗管理中是激活部分凝血活酶时间的可靠替代方法:一项多中心研究的结果。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov;14(11):2187-2193. doi: 10.1111/jth.13489. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Activated partial thromboplastin time versus antifactor Xa heparin assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion.活化部分凝血活酶时间与抗因子 Xa 肝素测定在监测持续静脉输注普通肝素中的应用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;45(7-8):861-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q161. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
5
Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin.抗因子 Xa 水平与活化部分凝血活酶时间用于监测未分级肝素。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jun;32(6):546-58. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01049.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
A comparison of red blood cell transfusion utilization between anti-activated factor X and activated partial thromboplastin monitoring in patients receiving unfractionated heparin.抗活化因子 X 与活化部分凝血活酶时间监测在下使用普通肝素的患者中红细胞输注利用的比较。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov;14(11):2148-2157. doi: 10.1111/jth.13476. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Concordance between Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time and Antifactor Xa Assay for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Hospitalized Hyperbilirubinemic Patients.活化部分凝血活酶时间与抗Xa因子测定法在监测住院高胆红素血症患者普通肝素中的一致性
R I Med J (2013). 2016 Mar 1;99(3):33-7.
8
Heparin dosage, level, and resistance in SARS-CoV2 infected patients in intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染 SARS-CoV2 的患者的肝素剂量、水平和耐药性。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Dec;43(6):1284-1290. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13543. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
9
Comparison of Managing Factor Xa Inhibitor to Unfractionated Heparin Transitions by aPTT Versus a Treatment Guideline Utilizing Heparin Anti-Xa Levels.依抗 Xa 因子活性的测定与采用肝素抗 Xa 浓度的治疗指南相比,管理 Xa 因子抑制剂至未分级肝素的转换的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Dec;56(12):1289-1298. doi: 10.1177/10600280221090211. Epub 2022 May 2.
10
Effectiveness of a Calculation-Free Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Nomogram With Anti-Xa Level Monitoring Compared With Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time.计算法免监测抗 Xa 水平的基于体重的普通肝素给药方案与活化部分凝血活酶时间比较的有效性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 May;55(5):575-583. doi: 10.1177/1060028020961503. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bleeding outcomes in critically ill patients on heparin with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity.接受肝素治疗的重症患者中,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)与抗Xa活性不一致时的出血结局。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):210-219. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
An Overview of Heparin Monitoring with the Anti-Xa Assay.抗 Xa assay 监测肝素概述。
Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2663:343-353. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_22.
3
Recent advances in the management of transient ischemic attacks.短暂性脑缺血发作治疗的最新进展
Fac Rev. 2022 Jul 22;11:19. doi: 10.12703/r/11-19. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Andexanet Alfa Use in Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Xa Inhibitor and Heparin Reversal Agent.安多明(Andexanet Alfa)在心脏外科手术患者中的应用:一种Xa因子抑制剂和肝素逆转剂。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jan;35(1):265-266. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.091. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
A Novel Laboratory Assay to Monitor Unfractionated Heparin Dosing in Patients Taking Apixaban Prior to Hospital Admission.一种新型实验室检测方法可监测入院前服用阿哌沙班的患者普通肝素的剂量。
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):378-386. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa084.
3
The effect of DOACs on laboratory tests and their removal by activated carbon to limit interference in functional assays.直接口服抗凝药物(DOACs)对实验室检测的影响及其通过活性炭清除以限制对功能检测的干扰。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2020 Jun;42 Suppl 1:41-48. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13196.
4
Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for venous thromboembolism treatment: Trends from 2012 to 2017.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于静脉血栓栓塞症治疗:2012年至2017年的趋势
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jun 9;3(4):668-673. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12222. eCollection 2019 Oct.
5
Evaluation of Antifactor-Xa Heparin Assay and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values in Patients on Therapeutic Continuous Infusion Unfractionated Heparin Therapy.评价在接受治疗性持续输注未分级肝素治疗的患者中抗因子 Xa 肝素测定和活化部分凝血活酶时间值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619876030. doi: 10.1177/1076029619876030.
6
An update on laboratory assessment for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)实验室检测的最新进展。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2019 May;41 Suppl 1:33-39. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12992.
7
International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.国际血液学标准化委员会(ICSH)关于直接口服抗凝剂实验室检测的建议。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;118(3):437-450. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627480. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Performance of Anti-Factor Xa Versus Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Heparin Monitoring Using Multiple Nomograms.使用多个列线图进行肝素监测时抗Xa因子与活化部分凝血活酶时间的性能比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Mar;24(2):310-316. doi: 10.1177/1076029617741363. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
The danger of relying on the APTT and PT in patients on DOAC therapy, a potential patient safety issue.在接受直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗的患者中,依赖活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)和凝血酶原时间(PT)存在风险,这是一个潜在的患者安全问题。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2017 May;39 Suppl 1:37-40. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12658.
10
Laboratory and Clinical Monitoring of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants: What Clinicians Need to Know.直接作用口服抗凝剂的实验室与临床监测:临床医生须知
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Feb;37(2):236-248. doi: 10.1002/phar.1884. Epub 2017 Feb 3.