• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸用于老年人肠道清洁的随机试验。

Randomized trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for bowel cleansing in elderly people.

作者信息

Nam Seung-Joo, Park Sung Chul, Lee Sung Joon, Lee Sang Hoon, Kim Ji Hyun, Bang Chang Seok, Seo Hyun Il

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;37(2):319-326. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15696. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15696
PMID:34562328
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The efficacy and safety of the recently introduced low-volume purgatives in elderly people are not well known. Therefore, in this trial, we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two low-volume agents, oral sulfate solution (OSS) and 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc), in elderly people.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, non-inferiority trial was performed at three university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea. Outpatients aged 65-80 years, who underwent elective colonoscopy, were enrolled. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 199 subjects were randomized into the OSS (n = 99) or the 2-L PEG-Asc (n = 100) group. Of them, 189 subjects were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (OSS group 95 vs PEG-Asc group 94). The proportion of adequate bowel preparation was 89.5% (85/95) in the OSS group and 93.6% (88/94) in the 2-L PEG-Asc group. OSS was not inferior to 2-L PEG-Asc according to the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -15% (95% confidence interval for the difference, -12.1 to 3.8). Vomiting (11.6% vs 2.1%) and thirst (24.2% vs 11.7%) were more common in the OSS group than in the 2-L PEG-Asc group.

CONCLUSIONS

OSS is an effective low-volume purgative that is non-inferior to 2-L PEG-Asc in elderly people. Both the low-volume agents were identified to be well tolerated and safe in the healthy elderly population.

摘要

背景与目的

近期推出的低容量泻药在老年人中的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。因此,在本试验中,我们旨在评估和比较两种低容量制剂,口服硫酸盐溶液(OSS)和含抗坏血酸的2升聚乙二醇(PEG-Asc)在老年人中的疗效。

方法

在韩国的三所大学附属医院进行了一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、多中心、非劣效性试验。纳入年龄在65 - 80岁、接受择期结肠镜检查的门诊患者。主要结局是使用波士顿肠道准备量表评估的充分肠道准备率。

结果

总共199名受试者被随机分为OSS组(n = 99)或2升PEG-Asc组(n = 100)。其中,189名受试者纳入主要结局分析(OSS组95例,PEG-Asc组94例)。OSS组充分肠道准备的比例为89.5%(85/95),2升PEG-Asc组为93.6%(88/94)。根据预先设定的非劣效性界值-15%,OSS不劣于2升PEG-Asc(差异的95%置信区间为-12.1至3.8)。OSS组呕吐(11.6%对2.1%)和口渴(24.2%对11.7%)比2升PEG-Asc组更常见。

结论

OSS是一种有效的低容量泻药,在老年人中不劣于2升PEG-Asc。两种低容量制剂在健康老年人群中耐受性良好且安全。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for bowel cleansing in elderly people.口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸用于老年人肠道清洁的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;37(2):319-326. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15696. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.评价 1L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和口服硫酸钠溶液的疗效:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030355.
4
Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution.1L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效和安全性:与口服硫酸镁溶液的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):651-660. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.030. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
5
Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.口服硫酸盐溶液与 2L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸分次服用在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):e431-e437. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001137.
6
Oral Sulfate Solution Is as Effective as Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid in a Split Method for Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Multicenter, and Single-Blind Clinical Trial.口服硫酸盐溶液在溃疡性结肠炎患者中与聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 分阶段灌肠准备的效果相当:一项随机、多中心、单盲临床试验。
Gut Liver. 2023 Jul 15;17(4):591-599. doi: 10.5009/gnl220202. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
Comparable Efficacy of a 1-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution Administered with Bisacodyl versus a 2-L PEG and Ascorbic Acid Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized and Investigator-Blinded Trial.与2升聚乙二醇(PEG)和抗坏血酸溶液相比,1升PEG与抗坏血酸溶液联合比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查准备的疗效相当:一项前瞻性、随机且研究者设盲的试验
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 2;11(9):e0162051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162051. eCollection 2016.
8
Comparison of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid and 4 L Polyethylene Glycol in Elderly Patients Aged 60-79: A Prospective Randomized Study.2L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 4L 聚乙二醇在 60-79 岁老年患者中的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Oct;67(10):4841-4850. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07354-y. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
9
A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol.一项评估口服硫酸盐溶液和 2-L 抗坏血酸加聚乙二醇疗效和顺应性的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(4):873-880. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.275. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
1 L- versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: a randomized multicenter study.1 L-与 2 L-聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的应用:一项随机多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5724-5733. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08947-4. Epub 2022 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03885-0.
2
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
DEN Open. 2025 Apr 16;5(1):e70113. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Educating Outpatients about Bowel Preparation.
一款移动健康应用程序用于对门诊患者进行肠道准备教育的有效性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;12(14):1374. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141374.
4
The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol.480毫升口服硫酸钠对改善高浓度聚乙二醇结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的疗效
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Sep 30;2023:6359165. doi: 10.1155/2023/6359165. eCollection 2023.
5
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study of the Chinese population.优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:一项针对中国人群的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;10:953441. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953441. eCollection 2022.
6
Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸溶液有益于结肠镜检查中息肉和腺瘤的检测:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1121-1133. doi: 10.1111/den.14299. Epub 2022 Apr 6.