• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

480毫升口服硫酸钠对改善高浓度聚乙二醇结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的疗效

The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol.

作者信息

Yoshida Naohisa, Inagaki Yoshikazu, Hasegawa Daisuke, Kobayashi Reo, Tomita Yuri, Hashimoto Hikaru, Hirose Ryohei, Dohi Osamu, Inoue Ken, Morimoto Yasutaka, Inada Yutaka, Murakami Takaaki, Itoh Yoshito

机构信息

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Nishijin Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Sep 30;2023:6359165. doi: 10.1155/2023/6359165. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/6359165
PMID:37808965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10560111/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is used for bowel preparation (BP) during colonoscopy. The way of taking this agent can be used a same-day regimen (only on the day of colonoscopy) and split regimen (the day before and on the day of colonoscopy) for receiving it. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of a same-day regimen of 480 ml OSS for insufficient bowel preparation (BP) with high-concentrated polyethylene glycol (H-PEG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022 at three related institutions on patients aged ≥ 20 years with a fair or poor Aronchick score of BP with 1 l H-PEG in previous colonoscopy. All patients received a low-residual diet and 10 ml of 0.75% picosulfate sodium a day before the colonoscopy and 480 ml of OSS and ≥1 l of water 3 hours before the colonoscopy. We analyzed the rate of improvement with OSS compared to H-PEG and other efficacies, and adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

We evaluated 125 cases (77 males) with an average age of 72.1 ± 8.8 years. The completion rate of 480 ml of OSS was 97.6% (122/125). The improvement rate of BP showing good or excellent score with OSS was 70.4% (88/125). Compared OSS with previous H-PEG, the insertion time (min) was 7.0 ± 4.8 vs. 8.1 ± 6.0 ( = 0.01), and the adenoma detection rates were 67.2% vs. 63.2% ( = 0.05). The cleansing time (min) was 131 ± 46 vs. 165 ± 53 ( < 0.01). The rate of AE with OSS was 10.4% (13/125). There were no significant differences about AE in age and gender. The tolerance of OSS compared with H-PEG (good/similar/bad) was 72.0%/24.8%/3.2% (amounts), 26.4%/39.2%/34.4% (taste), and 76.8%/10.4%/12.8% (overall preference), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The same-day regimen of 480 ml OSS effectively improved the insufficient BP of 1 l H-PEG.

摘要

目的

口服硫酸盐溶液(OSS)用于结肠镜检查期间的肠道准备(BP)。服用该药物的方式可采用当日方案(仅在结肠镜检查当天)和分阶段方案(结肠镜检查前一天和当天)。在本研究中,我们分析了480毫升OSS当日方案对高浓度聚乙二醇(H-PEG)肠道准备不足(BP)的疗效。

材料与方法

本多中心回顾性研究于2021年12月至2022年12月在三个相关机构对年龄≥20岁、之前结肠镜检查中BP的Aronchick评分中等或较差且使用1升H-PEG的患者进行。所有患者在结肠镜检查前一天接受低残留饮食和10毫升0.75%的匹可硫酸钠,在结肠镜检查前3小时接受480毫升OSS和≥1升水。我们分析了与H-PEG相比OSS的改善率及其他疗效,以及不良事件(AE)。

结果

我们评估了125例患者(77例男性),平均年龄为72.1±8.8岁。480毫升OSS的完成率为97.6%(122/125)。OSS显示BP评分良好或优秀的改善率为70.4%(88/125)。将OSS与之前的H-PEG相比,插入时间(分钟)为7.0±4.8 vs. 8.1±6.0(P = 0.01),腺瘤检出率分别为67.2% vs. 63.2%(P = 0.05)。清洁时间(分钟)为131±46 vs. 165±53(P < 0.01)。OSS的AE发生率为10.4%(13/125)。年龄和性别在AE方面无显著差异。与H-PEG相比,OSS的耐受性(好/相似/差)在量方面分别为72.0%/24.8%/3.2%,在味道方面分别为26.4%/39.2%/34.4%,在总体偏好方面分别为76.8%/10.4%/12.8%。

结论

480毫升OSS当日方案有效改善了1升H-PEG肠道准备不足的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/10560111/3fb4116fd99b/GRP2023-6359165.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/10560111/4a9d43f5e5d0/GRP2023-6359165.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/10560111/3fb4116fd99b/GRP2023-6359165.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/10560111/4a9d43f5e5d0/GRP2023-6359165.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6416/10560111/3fb4116fd99b/GRP2023-6359165.002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol.480毫升口服硫酸钠对改善高浓度聚乙二醇结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的疗效
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2023 Sep 30;2023:6359165. doi: 10.1155/2023/6359165. eCollection 2023.
2
A randomized, controlled trial of oral sulfate solution plus polyethylene glycol as a bowel preparation for colonoscopy.一项关于口服硫酸盐溶液加聚乙二醇作为结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep;80(3):482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Cost-analysis model of colonoscopy preparation using split-dose reduced-volume oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol with electrolytes solution (PEG-ELS).使用分剂量减量口服硫酸溶液(OSS)和聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS)进行结肠镜检查准备的成本分析模型。
J Med Econ. 2016;19(4):356-63. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1125907. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study.老年患者低容量准备的安全性和有效性:口服硫酸盐溶液在检查日的前一天和分剂量方案(SEE SAFE)研究。
Gut Liver. 2019 Mar 15;13(2):176-182. doi: 10.5009/gnl18214.
5
A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol.一项评估口服硫酸盐溶液和 2-L 抗坏血酸加聚乙二醇疗效和顺应性的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(4):873-880. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.275. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.评价 1L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和口服硫酸钠溶液的疗效:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030355.
7
Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution.1L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效和安全性:与口服硫酸镁溶液的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):651-660. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.030. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy.比较口服硫酸溶液与分剂量服用4升聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查准备的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;32(1):12-18. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13477.
9
Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.口服硫酸盐溶液与 2L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸分次服用在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):e431-e437. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001137.
10
Comparison of Oral Sulfate Solution and Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid on the Efficacy of Bowel Preparation.口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸在肠道准备效果上的比较
Clin Endosc. 2020 Sep;53(5):568-574. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.209. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
An in vitro study exploring a new method for managing peri-implant disease using the ten second technique.一项体外研究,探索使用十秒技术管理种植体周围疾病的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24870. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08946-8.
2
Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的比较:随机临床试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 13;28(1):99. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02981-9.
3
Efficacy of Two Kinds of Scissor-Type Knives for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial.评价 1L 聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和口服硫酸钠溶液的疗效:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030355.
2
Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服硫酸溶液有益于结肠镜检查中息肉和腺瘤的检测:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1121-1133. doi: 10.1111/den.14299. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
3
Oral sulfate solution versus low-volume polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
两种剪刀式刀在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项回顾性对比研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4214-4223. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08525-3. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
口服硫酸盐溶液与低容量聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 May;34(4):721-728. doi: 10.1111/den.14194. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Randomized trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for bowel cleansing in elderly people.口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸用于老年人肠道清洁的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;37(2):319-326. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15696. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
5
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy: Noninferiority-based, randomized, controlled study.口服硫酸盐溶液在日本接受结肠镜检查患者中的肠道准备效果和安全性:基于非劣效性的随机对照研究。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Nov;33(7):1131-1138. doi: 10.1111/den.13930. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
The Efficacy of Short-Duration Polyethylene Glycol plus Electrolytes for Improving Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy in Patients with Chronic Constipation.短期聚乙二醇加电解质对改善慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查肠道准备的疗效
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Nov 24;2020:8886073. doi: 10.1155/2020/8886073. eCollection 2020.
7
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 更新 2019 年。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
8
A prospective randomized clinical study evaluating the efficacy and compliance of oral sulfate solution and 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol.一项评估口服硫酸盐溶液和 2-L 抗坏血酸加聚乙二醇疗效和顺应性的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(4):873-880. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2017.275. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Comparison Between an Oral Sulfate Solution and a 2 L of Polyethylene Glycol/Ascorbic Acid as a Split Dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.口服硫酸盐溶液与 2L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸分次服用在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的比较。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov/Dec;53(10):e431-e437. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001137.
10
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;30(8):819-826. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001175.