University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Sep 25;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02626-4.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: REFLECTIONS B538-02 is a randomized, double-blind comparative study of the adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar PF-06410293, (ADL-PF), and reference ADL sourced from the European Union (ADL-EU) in patients with active RA. Therapeutic equivalence was demonstrated based on ACR20 responses at week 12 (primary endpoint). We report long-term safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of ADL-PF in patients who continued ADL-PF treatment throughout 78 weeks or who switched from ADL-EU to ADL-PF at week 26 or week 52.
Eligible patients (2010 ACR/EULAR RA diagnosis criteria for ≥ 4 months; inadequate response to MTX, ≤ 2 doses non-ADL biologic), stratified by geographic regions were initially randomized (1:1) in treatment period 1 (TP1) to ADL-PF or ADL-EU (40 mg subcutaneously, biweekly), both with MTX (10-25 mg/week). At week 26 (start of TP2), patients receiving ADL-EU were re-randomized to remain on ADL-EU or transition to ADL-PF for 26 weeks. At week 52 (start of TP3), all patients received open-label treatment with ADL-PF for 26 weeks and were followed after last treatment dose to week 92. To evaluate maintenance of response after switching or remaining on ADL-PF, ACR20, DAS28-4(CRP), and other measures of clinical response/remission were assessed through week 78 as secondary endpoints. Three groups were evaluated: biosimilar, week 26 switch, and week 52 switch.
Overall, 507 patients participated in TP3. ACR20 response rates at week 52 were 88.4%, 88.2%, and 87.6% for the biosimilar, week 26, and week 52 switch groups, respectively. ACR20 response rates and DAS28-4(CRP) scores were sustained and comparable across groups in TP3. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) during TP3 and follow-up was 42.6% (biosimilar), 37.0% (week 26 switch), and 50.8% (week 52 switch); 3 (0.6%) patients (all week 52 switch) reported treatment-related serious AEs. ADL-PF was generally well tolerated, with a comparable safety profile across groups. Overall, incidences of patients with anti-drug antibodies in TP3 and follow-up were comparable among groups (46.1%, 46.5%, and 54.2%, respectively).
There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy for patients who were maintained on ADL-PF for 78 weeks and those who had switched from ADL-EU at week 26 or week 52.
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02480153. First posted on June 24, 2015; EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT number: 2014-000352-29. Start date, October 27, 2014.
背景/目的:REFLECTIONS B538-02 是阿达木单抗(ADL)生物类似药 PF-06410293(ADL-PF)与源自欧盟的 ADL(ADL-EU)的一项随机、双盲对照研究,纳入的患者均为患有活动性 RA、接受甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗但应答不足(MTX 治疗<2 个剂量,且未接受非 ADL 生物制剂治疗)的患者。第 12 周时 ACR20 应答是主要终点,研究显示 ADL-PF 与 ADL-EU 具有治疗等效性。我们报告了在 REFLECTIONS B538-02 研究中,接受 ADL-PF 治疗 78 周的患者和在第 26 周或第 52 周时从 ADL-EU 转换为 ADL-PF 的患者的长期安全性、免疫原性和疗效。
符合 2010 年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(ACR/EULAR)RA 诊断标准(≥4 个月;接受 MTX 治疗应答不足,接受的非 ADL 生物制剂治疗≤2 个剂量)的患者,按地理区域分层,在治疗期 1(TP1)中随机(1:1)接受 ADL-PF 或 ADL-EU(皮下注射 40mg,每两周 1 次)治疗,同时接受 MTX(10-25mg/周)治疗。在第 26 周(TP2 开始时),接受 ADL-EU 治疗的患者重新随机分组,继续接受 ADL-EU 治疗或转换为 ADL-PF 治疗 26 周。在第 52 周(TP3 开始时),所有患者接受 ADL-PF 开放标签治疗 26 周,并在最后一次治疗后随访至第 92 周。为了评估转换或继续使用 ADL-PF 后的应答维持情况,在第 78 周评估次要终点时,评估了 ACR20、DAS28-4(CRP)和其他临床应答/缓解措施。共评估了 3 组:生物类似药组、第 26 周转换组和第 52 周转换组。
共有 507 例患者参与了 TP3。第 52 周时,生物类似药组、第 26 周转换组和第 52 周转换组的 ACR20 应答率分别为 88.4%、88.2%和 87.6%。在 TP3 中,各组的 ACR20 应答率和 DAS28-4(CRP)评分均持续且相当。TP3 期间和随访期间的治疗出现不良事件(AE)发生率分别为 42.6%(生物类似药组)、37.0%(第 26 周转换组)和 50.8%(第 52 周转换组);3 例(均为第 52 周转换组)患者发生与治疗相关的严重 AE。ADL-PF 通常具有良好的耐受性,各组的安全性特征相当。总体而言,TP3 和随访期间发生抗药物抗体的患者比例在各组间相当(分别为 46.1%、46.5%和 54.2%)。
对于接受 ADL-PF 治疗 78 周的患者和在第 26 周或第 52 周时从 ADL-EU 转换的患者,在安全性、免疫原性和疗效方面无临床意义上的差异。
ClinicalTrials.gov ,NCT02480153。首次于 2015 年 6 月 24 日提交;欧盟临床试验注册处;EudraCT 编号:2014-000352-29。开始日期:2014 年 10 月 27 日。