J Sport Rehabil. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):85-98. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0432. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Aquatic plyometric training may provide benefits due to reduced joint loading compared with land plyometric training; however, the reduced loading may also limit performance gains.
To systematically review the effect of aquatic plyometric training on strength, performance outcomes, soreness, and adverse events in healthy individuals.
Five databases were searched from inception to June 2020. Quality assessment and data extraction were independently completed by 2 investigators. When similar outcome measures were used, standardized mean differences were calculated.
A total of 19 randomized controlled trials with 633 participants (mean age, range 14-30 y) were included. Aquatic plyometric training was most commonly performed in waist to chest deep water (12/19 studies), 2 to 3 times per week for 6 to 12 weeks (18/19 studies), with final program foot contacts ranging from 120 to 550. Meta-analyses were not completed due to the clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies. Compared with land plyometric training, aquatic plyometric training exercises and dosage were replicated (15/16 studies) and showed typically similar performance gains (3/4 knee extensor strength measures, 2/4 leg extensor strength measures, 3/4 knee flexor strength measures, 7/10 vertical jump measures, 3/3 sprint measures). In total, 2 of 3 studies monitoring muscle soreness reported significantly less soreness following training in water compared with on land. Compared with no active training (no exercise control group or passive stretching), most effect sizes demonstrated a mean improvement favoring aquatic plyometric training (23/32 measures). However, these were not significant for the majority of studies measuring isokinetic knee strength, vertical jump, and sprinting. The effect sizes for both studies assessing leg press strength indicated that aquatic plyometric training is significantly more effective than no training.
Aquatic plyometric training appears similarly effective to land plyometric exercise for improving strength, jumping, and sprinting and may be indicated when joint impact loading needs to be minimized. However, the low quality of studies limits the strength of the conclusions.
与陆地增强式训练相比,水中增强式训练由于关节负荷较小,可能具有一定益处;然而,负荷的降低也可能限制运动表现的提升。
系统评价水中增强式训练对健康个体的力量、运动表现结果、酸痛和不良事件的影响。
从建库至 2020 年 6 月,5 个数据库被检索。2 名研究者独立完成质量评估和数据提取。当使用相似的结局测量指标时,计算标准化均数差值。
共纳入 19 项随机对照试验,包含 633 名参与者(平均年龄 14-30 岁)。19 项研究中有 12 项在水深至胸部的水中进行水中增强式训练(12/19 项研究),每周 2-3 次,共 6-12 周(18/19 项研究),最后方案的足部触水次数为 120-550 次。由于研究间的临床和统计学异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。与陆地增强式训练相比,水中增强式训练的练习和剂量是可复制的(15/16 项研究),且通常显示出相似的运动表现提升(3/4 项膝关节伸肌力量测量指标、2/4 项腿部伸肌力量测量指标、3/4 项膝关节屈肌力量测量指标、7/10 项垂直跳跃测量指标、3/3 项冲刺测量指标)。在总共 3 项监测肌肉酸痛的研究中,有 2 项报告水中训练后的酸痛感明显低于陆地训练。与无主动训练(无运动对照组或被动拉伸)相比,大多数效应量显示出有利于水中增强式训练的平均改善(23/32 项测量指标)。然而,对于大多数测量等速膝关节力量、垂直跳跃和冲刺的研究,这些结果并不显著。评估腿举力量的两项研究的效应量表明,水中增强式训练明显比无训练更有效。
与陆地增强式训练相比,水中增强式训练在改善力量、跳跃和冲刺方面似乎同样有效,当需要最小化关节冲击负荷时,可以选择水中增强式训练。然而,研究质量较低限制了结论的强度。