Yu Linling, Chen Lei, Guo Hao
Physical Education Group, Hefei No.3 Middle School, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China.
Department of Physical Education, Woosuk University, Wanju County, 55338, North Jeolla Province, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84243-0.
The objective of the present study was to examine the impact of different plyometric training (PT) surfaces on the adaptive changes of jumping ability, sprinting speed, change of direction ability and strength performance in volleyball players. Forty male players participated in the study and were divided into four equal groups performing PT in aquatic (APT), sand (SPT), and land (LPT) surfaces, or an active control group (CON). All training groups indicated small to large significant (p = 0.001) improvements in countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ), standing long jump (SLJ), spike jump, block jump, 10-m sprint, T-test, and maximal strength after the 6 weeks of progressive volume-based overload PT and in comparison to CON group (p < 0.05). Both the APT (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.97, p = 0.01) and SPT (SMD = 1.10, p = 0.04) exhibited superior training advancements compared to LPT in the CMVJ performance. Notably, the APT displayed significantly greater improvements than the LPT in SLJ (SMD = 0.31, p = 0.043), sprint (SMD = -0.63, p = 0.028), T-test, (SMD = -0.46, p = 0.022) and strength (SMD = 0.61, p = 0.03) performance. Based on these results, it is recommended that incorporating APT and SPT induced greater training benefits than LPT in the CMVJ, while the application of APT is suggested for greater enhancing in linear sprint, change of direction ability, and maximal strength compared to land training method.
本研究的目的是探讨不同的增强式训练(PT)表面对排球运动员跳跃能力、短跑速度、变向能力和力量表现适应性变化的影响。40名男性运动员参与了该研究,他们被分为四组,分别在水上(APT)、沙地(SPT)和陆地(LPT)表面进行PT训练,或作为一个积极对照组(CON)。在进行了6周基于渐进式负荷的PT训练后,与CON组相比(p<0.05),所有训练组在反向纵跳(CMVJ)、立定跳远(SLJ)、扣球跳、拦网跳、10米短跑、T检验和最大力量方面均有显著(p = 0.001)的改善,改善程度从小到大都有。在CMVJ表现方面,APT组(标准化平均差[SMD]=0.97,p = 0.01)和SPT组(SMD = 1.10,p = 0.04)与LPT组相比均表现出更好的训练进步。值得注意的是,在SLJ(SMD = 0.31, p = 0.043)、短跑(SMD = -0.63, p = 0.028)、T检验(SMD = -0.46, p = 0.022)和力量(SMD = 0.61, p = 0.03)表现方面,APT组比LPT组有显著更大的改善。基于这些结果建议,在CMVJ方面,采用APT和SPT训练比LPT能带来更大的训练益处;与陆地训练方法相比,建议采用APT训练来更大程度地提高直线短跑、变向能力和最大力量。