• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用基于团队的学习教学法为药学院认证自评做准备。

Use of Team-Based Learning Pedagogy to Prepare for a Pharmacy School Accreditation Self-Study.

作者信息

Vinall Ruth, Malhotra Ashim, Puglisi Jose

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA 95757, USA.

Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA 95757, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;9(3):148. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030148.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy9030148
PMID:34564555
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8482079/
Abstract

Ensuring adequate engagement and preparation of all stakeholders in an accreditation self-study can be challenging for many reasons, including lack of motivation and inadequate understanding of expectations and procedures. The goal of this exploratory study was to determine whether using team-based learning (TBL) pedagogy to deliver an accreditation preparation workshop could effectively prepare and engage participants. A Likert-scale questionnaire was administered to workshop attendees ( = 52) to determine whether they found TBL-based training helpful and whether it promoted engagement. Twenty-four attendees completed the survey (46%). More than 80% of participants strongly agreed or agreed with 12 statements relating to perceptions of self and participant engagement within team activities and the usefulness of team activities. More than 65% of participants strongly agreed or agreed with statements relating to the helpfulness of the TBL approach in preparing for the self-study (five questions). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in responses based on whether on not participants had previously been involved in an accreditation self study. Our data indicate that a TBL approach can be an effective way to engage and prepare stakeholders for an accreditation self-study, and that TBL pedagogy has utility outside of the classroom setting.

摘要

由于多种原因,要确保所有利益相关者充分参与并准备好认证自我评估具有挑战性,包括缺乏积极性以及对期望和程序的理解不足。这项探索性研究的目的是确定采用基于团队学习(TBL)的教学法开展认证准备工作坊是否能有效地让参与者做好准备并积极参与。向工作坊参与者(n = 52)发放了一份李克特量表问卷,以确定他们是否认为基于TBL的培训有帮助以及它是否促进了参与度。24名参与者完成了调查(46%)。超过80%的参与者强烈同意或同意与自我认知、团队活动中的参与者参与度以及团队活动的有用性相关的12项陈述。超过65%的参与者强烈同意或同意与TBL方法对准备自我评估的帮助相关的陈述(五个问题)。亚组分析表明,根据参与者之前是否参与过认证自我评估,回答没有显著差异。我们的数据表明,TBL方法可以是让利益相关者参与并为认证自我评估做好准备的有效方式,并且TBL教学法在课堂之外也有实用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8387/8482079/b2a04de57367/pharmacy-09-00148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8387/8482079/ee11751e6890/pharmacy-09-00148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8387/8482079/b2a04de57367/pharmacy-09-00148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8387/8482079/ee11751e6890/pharmacy-09-00148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8387/8482079/b2a04de57367/pharmacy-09-00148-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Team-Based Learning Pedagogy to Prepare for a Pharmacy School Accreditation Self-Study.运用基于团队的学习教学法为药学院认证自评做准备。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;9(3):148. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030148.
2
Team-Based Learning in Prosthodontics Courses: Students' Satisfaction.口腔修复学课程中的团队协作学习:学生满意度
Int J Dent. 2022 Jan 20;2022:4546381. doi: 10.1155/2022/4546381. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessment of students' satisfaction with a student-led team-based learning course.学生对以学生为主导的小组学习课程满意度的评估。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015 Jun 11;12:23. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.23. eCollection 2015.
4
Student preparation time for traditional lecture versus team-based learning in a pharmacotherapy course.在药物治疗课程中,学生为传统讲座式学习和基于团队的学习所做的准备时间。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Mar;10(3):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Team-based learning pedagogy enhances the quality of Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队学习教学法提高了中国药学教育的质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1724-6.
6
Perception of team-based learning using the team-based learning student assessment instrument: an exploratory analysis within pharmacy and biomedical students in the United Kingdom.使用基于团队学习的学生评估工具对基于团队学习的认知:英国药学和生物医学专业学生的探索性分析
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:23. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.23. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
7
Faculty perception of team-based learning over multiple semesters.教师对多学期基于团队学习的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):1010-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Professional and pre-professional pharmacy students' perceptions of team based learning (TBL) at a private research-intensive university.私立研究型大学中专业及准专业药学专业学生对基于团队的学习(TBL)的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):666-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master's degree in nursing education course.团队学习与基于讲座的教学与小组讨论在护理教育硕士课程中的比较。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105043. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105043. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
A survey of student perceptions of team-based learning in anatomy curriculum: favorable views unrelated to grades.一项关于解剖学课程中基于团队学习的学生认知的调查:与成绩无关的积极看法。
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;2(4):150-5. doi: 10.1002/ase.91.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of team-based learning on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students.团队学习对药学学生批判性思维技能的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Team-based learning: design, facilitation and participation.团队学习:设计、促进和参与。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):461. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02287-y.
3
The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: report of an International Consensus Group.21世纪卫生专业教育中认证的作用:国际共识小组报告
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 28;20(Suppl 1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02121-5.
4
Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education: 2019 Annual Report.药学教育认证委员会:2019年度报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe8222. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8222.
5
Team-based learning (TBL): a community of practice.团队学习法(TBL):一种实践共同体。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1795-4.
6
Incorporating ACPE Standards in a Holistic Approach to School Operations and Accreditation.将 ACPE 标准纳入学校运营和认证的整体方法中。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):7073. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7073.
7
Understanding the early effects of team-based learning on student accountability and engagement using a three session TBL pilot.通过一个为期三节课的团队协作学习试点,了解团队协作学习对学生责任感和参与度的早期影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):802-807. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL?医学课程中的团队学习(TBL):比 PBL 更好?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z.
9
How cognitive engagement fluctuates during a team-based learning session and how it predicts academic achievement.认知投入在团队学习过程中的波动情况,以及它如何预测学业成绩。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):339-351. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9801-2. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Cross-validation of the Student Perceptions of Team-Based Learning Scale in the United States.美国基于团队学习量表的学生认知的交叉验证
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Jun 29;14:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.15. eCollection 2017.