Lein Donald H, Lowman John D, Eidson Christopher A, Yuen Hon K
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala., USA.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala., USA.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Jun 29;14:15. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.15. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of this study was to cross-validate the factor structure of the previously developed Student Perceptions of Team-Based Learning (TBL) Scale among students in an entry-level doctor of physical therapy (DPT) program in the United States.
Toward the end of the semester in 2 patient/client management courses taught using TBL, 115 DPT students completed the Student Perceptions of TBL Scale, with a response rate of 87%. Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to replicate and confirm the underlying factor structure of the scale.
Based on the PCA for the validation sample, the original 2-factor structure (preference for TBL and preference for teamwork) of the Student Perceptions of TBL Scale was replicated. The overall goodness-of-fit indices from the CFA suggested that the original 2-factor structure for the 15 items of the scale demonstrated a good model fit (comparative fit index, 0.95; non-normed fit index/Tucker-Lewis index, 0.93; root mean square error of approximation, 0.06; and standardized root mean square residual, 0.07). The 2 factors demonstrated high internal consistency (alpha= 0.83 and 0.88, respectively). DPT students taught using TBL viewed the factor of preference for teamwork more favorably than preference for TBL.
Our findings provide evidence supporting the replicability of the internal structure of the Student Perceptions of TBL Scale when assessing perceptions of TBL among DPT students in patient/client management courses.
本研究旨在对先前开发的《学生对基于团队学习(TBL)的认知量表》的因子结构在美国物理治疗入门级博士(DPT)项目的学生中进行交叉验证。
在使用TBL教学的2门患者/客户管理课程学期末,115名DPT学生完成了《学生对TBL的认知量表》,回复率为87%。进行主成分分析(PCA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)以复制和确认该量表潜在的因子结构。
基于验证样本的PCA,复制了《学生对TBL的认知量表》最初的双因子结构(对TBL的偏好和对团队合作的偏好)。CFA的整体拟合优度指数表明,该量表15个条目的最初双因子结构显示出良好的模型拟合(比较拟合指数为0.95;非标准化拟合指数/塔克 - 刘易斯指数为0.93;近似均方根误差为0.06;标准化均方根残差为0.07)。这两个因子显示出较高的内部一致性(α分别为0.83和0.88)。使用TBL教学的DPT学生对团队合作偏好因子的看法比对TBL偏好因子更为积极。
我们的研究结果提供了证据,支持在评估DPT学生在患者/客户管理课程中对TBL的认知时《学生对TBL的认知量表》内部结构的可复制性。