• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公安干警家属的经历:定性证据的系统评价研究方案。

Experiences of families of public safety personnel: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Department of Family Studies and Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;10(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01807-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01807-1
PMID:34565463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8474829/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public safety occupations are well-recognized to be dangerous and stressful. Despite recent attention on post-traumatic stress injuries among public safety personnel, there has been considerably less attention paid to the ongoing ways in which the risks and requirements associated with those occupations shape family life, and how families respond and adapt to those lifestyle dimensions. This systematic review aims to understand how day-to-day family life is affected and shaped when a family member works in a public safety sector, such as fire, police, paramedic, corrections, and emergency communications.

METHODS

Qualitative studies that examine the experiences of families or family members of public safety personnel will be included in this review, with no date or language restrictions. An initial search of Embase and CINAHL will be conducted, followed by an analysis of text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the articles. Databases to be searched for published studies include MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Sciences, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. Titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers. The full texts of selected studies will be assessed in detail, and findings and their illustrations will be extracted and aggregated. Any disagreements between the reviewers that arise at each stage will be resolved through discussion, or by a third reviewer. Further analysis of the synthesized findings will be informed by family systems theory.

DISCUSSION

The ways that occupational risks and requirements shape family life have been better investigated within other high-risk occupation groups, which has led to productive advancements in organizational policies and supports in the respective sectors. An understanding of the experiences which typify family life ongoing within PSP sectors is a critical gap in the development of meaningful family-informed occupational initiatives and supports.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Submitted to PROSPERO for systematic review registration: CRD42020208126.

摘要

背景

众所周知,公共安全职业既危险又充满压力。尽管最近人们关注公共安全人员的创伤后应激损伤,但对于与这些职业相关的风险和要求如何塑造家庭生活,以及家庭如何应对和适应这些生活方式方面,关注甚少。本系统评价旨在了解当家庭成员从事公共安全部门(如消防、警察、护理人员、惩教和紧急通信)的工作时,日常生活会受到怎样的影响和塑造。

方法

本研究将纳入定性研究,这些研究探讨了公共安全人员的家庭或家庭成员的经验,无日期或语言限制。我们将首先对 Embase 和 CINAHL 进行初步检索,然后分析标题和摘要中包含的文本词,以及用于描述文章的索引词。用于搜索已发表研究的数据库包括 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Sciences、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Sociological Abstracts。两位独立审查员将筛选标题和摘要。选择的研究的全文将进行详细评估,并提取和汇总研究结果及其说明。如果在每个阶段审查员之间出现分歧,将通过讨论或由第三位审查员解决。通过家庭系统理论进一步分析综合研究结果。

讨论

在其他高风险职业群体中,已经更好地研究了职业风险和要求如何塑造家庭生活,这导致了各自部门的组织政策和支持方面的有益进展。了解 PSP 部门中持续存在的典型家庭生活经历是制定有意义的家庭为导向的职业举措和支持的关键空白。

系统评价注册

已向 PROSPERO 提交系统评价注册:CRD42020208126。

相似文献

1
Experiences of families of public safety personnel: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.公安干警家属的经历:定性证据的系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;10(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01807-1.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Experiences and perceptions of family members of emergency first responders with post-traumatic stress disorder: a qualitative systematic review.患有创伤后应激障碍的急救人员家庭成员的经历与认知:一项定性系统综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Apr 1;21(4):629-668. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00433.
4
Experiences and perceptions of family members of emergency first responders with post-traumatic stress disorder: a qualitative systematic review protocol.紧急第一响应者创伤后应激障碍家属的经历和看法:定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jul 1;19(7):1622-1631. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00255.
5
Experiences of transition to motherhood among pregnant women following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.辅助生殖技术后孕妇向母亲角色转变的经历:定性证据的系统评价方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jan;18(1):74-80. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00071.
6
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Exploring the Occupational Lifestyle Experiences of the Families of Public Safety Personnel.探索公共安全人员家庭的职业生活方式体验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec;34(4):895-912. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10179-x. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Experiences and perceptions of military and emergency services personnel identifying as LGBTQIA+ and their families: a qualitative systematic review protocol.认同自己为 LGBTQIA+ 的军事和应急服务人员及其家属的经历与看法:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Sep 1;21(9):1847-1853. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00256.
10
The experience of families following traumatic brain injury in adult populations: A meta-synthesis of narrative structures.成人创伤性脑损伤患者家庭的体验:叙事结构的元综合。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Nov;123:104043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104043. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifestyle Dimensions of Public Safety Personnel Families: There's No Life Like It.公共安全人员家庭的生活维度:独一无二的生活。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(2):268-277. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10213-y. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
2
Exploring the Occupational Lifestyle Experiences of the Families of Public Safety Personnel.探索公共安全人员家庭的职业生活方式体验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec;34(4):895-912. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10179-x. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Understanding and Addressing Occupational Stressors in Internet-Delivered Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: A Qualitative Analysis.理解和应对公共安全人员互联网心理治疗中的职业压力源:定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084744.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental health training, attitudes toward support, and screening positive for mental disorders.心理健康培训、对支持的态度以及精神障碍筛查呈阳性
Cogn Behav Ther. 2020 Jan;49(1):55-73. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2019.1575900. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
Caring for Canadian military families.关爱加拿大军人家庭。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Jan;65(1):9-11.
3
Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada.加拿大公共安全人员的精神障碍症状。
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;63(1):54-64. doi: 10.1177/0706743717723825. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
4
Testing a Military Family Stress Model.检验军人家庭应激模型。
Fam Process. 2018 Jun;57(2):415-431. doi: 10.1111/famp.12282. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.定性研究综合:利用元聚合的系统评价者的方法学指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
6
Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach.建立对定性研究综合结果的信心:ConQual方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 20;14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.