Ibrahim Fabio, Münscher Johann-Christoph, Herzberg Philipp Yorck
Department of Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Helmut-Schmidt-University, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 9;12:720072. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720072. eCollection 2021.
The Impostor-Profile (IPP) is a six-dimensional questionnaire measuring the Impostor Phenomenon facets. This study aims to test (a) the appropriateness of a total score, (b) measurement invariance (MI) between gender, (c) the reliability of the IPP, and (d) the convergent validity of the IPP subscales. The sample consisted of = 482 individuals (64% female). To identify whether the scales of the IPP form a total score, we compared four models: (1) six correlating subscales, (2) a general factor model, (3) a second-order model with one second-order factor and six first-order factors, and (4) a bifactorial model with six group factors. The bifactorial model obtained the best fit. This supports the assumption of a total impostor score. The inspection of structural validity between gender subgroups showed configural, metric, and partial scalar MI. Factor mean comparisons supported the assumption that females and males differ in latent means of the Impostor Phenomenon expressions. The omega coefficients showed sufficient reliability (≥0.71), except for the subscale Need for Sympathy. Overall, the findings of the bifactor model fit and construct validity support the assumption that the measurement through total expression is meaningful in addition to the theoretically formulated multidimensionality of the Impostor Phenomenon.
冒名顶替者形象量表(IPP)是一个用于测量冒名顶替现象各方面的六维度问卷。本研究旨在检验:(a)总分的适宜性;(b)性别间的测量不变性(MI);(c)IPP的信度;以及(d)IPP分量表的收敛效度。样本由482名个体组成(64%为女性)。为确定IPP的量表是否能形成一个总分,我们比较了四个模型:(1)六个相互关联的分量表;(2)一个一般因素模型;(3)一个具有一个二阶因素和六个一阶因素的二阶模型;以及(4)一个具有六个组因素的双因素模型。双因素模型拟合度最佳。这支持了存在一个冒名顶替者总分的假设。对性别亚组间结构效度的检验显示了构型、度量和部分标量测量不变性。因素均值比较支持了这样的假设,即女性和男性在冒名顶替现象表达的潜在均值上存在差异。除同情需求分量表外,ω系数显示出足够的信度(≥0.71)。总体而言,双因素模型拟合和结构效度的研究结果支持了这样的假设,即除了理论上阐述的冒名顶替现象的多维度性外,通过总体表达进行测量也是有意义的。