Lauxmann Stephan, Sonnenberg Lukas, Koch Nils A, Bosselmann Christian, Winter Natalie, Schwarz Niklas, Wuttke Thomas V, Hedrich Ulrike B S, Liu Yuanyuan, Lerche Holger, Benda Jan, Kegele Josua
Department of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 9;12:703970. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.703970. eCollection 2021.
Among genetic paroxysmal movement disorders, variants in ion channel coding genes constitute a major subgroup. Loss-of-function (LOF) variants in , the gene coding for K1.1 channels, are associated with episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1), characterized by seconds to minutes-lasting attacks including gait incoordination, limb ataxia, truncal instability, dysarthria, nystagmus, tremor, and occasionally seizures, but also persistent neuromuscular symptoms like myokymia or neuromyotonia. Standard treatment has not yet been developed, and different treatment efforts need to be systematically evaluated. Personalized therapeutic regimens tailored to disease-causing pathophysiological mechanisms may offer the specificity required to overcome limitations in therapy. Toward this aim, we (i) reviewed all available clinical reports on treatment response and functional consequences of variants causing EA1, (ii) examined the potential effects on neuronal excitability of all variants using a single compartment conductance-based model and set out to assess the potential of two sodium channel blockers (SCBs: carbamazepine and riluzole) to restore the identified underlying pathophysiological effects of K1.1 channels, and (iii) provide a comprehensive review of the literature considering all types of episodic ataxia. Reviewing the treatment efforts of EA1 patients revealed moderate response to acetazolamide and exhibited the strength of SCBs, especially carbamazepine, in the treatment of EA1 patients. Biophysical dysfunction of K1.1 channels is typically based on depolarizing shifts of steady-state activation, leading to an LOF of variant channels. Our model predicts a lowered rheobase and an increase of the firing rate on a neuronal level. The estimated concentration dependent effects of carbamazepine and riluzole could partially restore the altered gating properties of dysfunctional variant channels. These data strengthen the potential of SCBs to contribute to functional compensation of dysfunctional K1.1 channels. We propose riluzole as a new drug repurposing candidate and highlight the role of personalized approaches to develop standard care for EA1 patients. These results could have implications for clinical practice in future and highlight the need for the development of individualized and targeted therapies for episodic ataxia and genetic paroxysmal disorders in general.
在遗传性阵发性运动障碍中,离子通道编码基因的变异构成了一个主要亚组。编码K1.1通道的基因中的功能丧失(LOF)变异与发作性共济失调1型(EA1)相关,其特征为持续数秒至数分钟的发作,包括步态共济失调、肢体共济失调、躯干不稳、构音障碍、眼球震颤、震颤,偶尔还有癫痫发作,同时还伴有持续性神经肌肉症状,如肌束震颤或神经性肌强直。目前尚未开发出标准治疗方法,需要对不同的治疗措施进行系统评估。针对致病病理生理机制制定的个性化治疗方案可能提供克服治疗局限性所需的特异性。为了实现这一目标,我们(i)回顾了所有关于导致EA1的变异的治疗反应和功能后果的现有临床报告,(ii)使用基于单室电导的模型研究了所有变异对神经元兴奋性的潜在影响,并着手评估两种钠通道阻滞剂(SCBs:卡马西平和利鲁唑)恢复已确定的K1.1通道潜在病理生理效应的潜力,以及(iii)全面回顾考虑所有类型发作性共济失调的文献。回顾EA1患者的治疗措施发现,他们对乙酰唑胺有中度反应,并显示出SCBs,尤其是卡马西平,在治疗EA1患者方面的优势。K1.1通道的生物物理功能障碍通常基于稳态激活的去极化偏移,导致变异通道的功能丧失。我们的模型预测在神经元水平上阈强度降低和放电频率增加。卡马西平和利鲁唑的浓度依赖性效应估计可以部分恢复功能失调变异通道改变的门控特性。这些数据强化了SCBs对功能失调的K1.1通道进行功能补偿的潜力。我们提议将利鲁唑作为一种新的药物再利用候选药物,并强调个性化方法在为EA1患者制定标准护理中的作用。这些结果可能对未来的临床实践产生影响,并突出了为发作性共济失调和一般遗传性阵发性疾病开发个体化和靶向治疗的必要性。