• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家公园的旅游管理:捷克-德国边境地区的舒马瓦和巴伐利亚森林

Tourism management in national parks: Šumava and Bayerischer Wald (Bavarian Forest) in the Czech-German borderland.

作者信息

Kołodziejczyk Krzysztof

机构信息

Department of Regional Geography and Tourism, Institute of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Wroclaw, 54-152 Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Mt Sci. 2021;18(9):2213-2239. doi: 10.1007/s11629-021-6853-9. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11629-021-6853-9
PMID:34567095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8452121/
Abstract

Along the Czech-German border there are four national parks, two Czech and two German, arranged in cross-border 'pairs'. This article focuses on the southern 'pair' formed by the parks of Šumava and Bayerischer Wald (Bavarian Forest). The aim is to evaluate and compare tourism organization in their areas, taking into account selected aspects of management: the network of hiking trails with its related infrastructure, transport accessibility, a typology of tourist centers, as well as directions and destinations of tourist movements. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the availability of geographical space for tourists is much greater in the German than in the Czech national park, and the tourism infrastructure is clearly more extensive there, including the network of tourist trails. This is mainly due to the longer and fairly uninterrupted development of tourism in this area. Šumava National Park can be identified as a model in terms of how to adjust the directions of tourist movements and the layout of the tourist trail network to the needs of natural environment. On the basis of observations in both national parks, it is possible to indicate various solutions that, after appropriate adaptation, may bring benefits to other protected areas.

摘要

沿着捷克与德国边境分布着四个国家公园,其中两个在捷克,两个在德国,它们以跨境“配对”的形式排列。本文聚焦于由舒马瓦国家公园和巴伐利亚森林国家公园组成的南部“配对”。目的是评估和比较它们所在区域的旅游组织情况,同时考虑管理的选定方面:徒步小径网络及其相关基础设施、交通可达性、旅游中心类型,以及游客流动的方向和目的地。根据结果可以得出结论,德国国家公园为游客提供的地理空间比捷克国家公园大得多,而且那里的旅游基础设施明显更广泛,包括旅游步道网络。这主要是由于该地区旅游业发展时间更长且相当连贯。就如何根据自然环境需求调整游客流动方向和旅游步道网络布局而言,舒马瓦国家公园堪称典范。基于对两个国家公园的观察,可以指出各种经过适当调整后可能会给其他保护区带来益处的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Tourism management in national parks: Šumava and Bayerischer Wald (Bavarian Forest) in the Czech-German borderland.国家公园的旅游管理:捷克-德国边境地区的舒马瓦和巴伐利亚森林
J Mt Sci. 2021;18(9):2213-2239. doi: 10.1007/s11629-021-6853-9. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Consequences of the accessibility of the mountain national parks in Poland.波兰山区国家公园的可达性后果。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):27483-27500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24197-w. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Concentration measurements of PCDD/F in air and spruce needles in the Bavarian Forest and Bohemian Forest (Sumava): first results.巴伐利亚森林和波希米亚森林(舒马瓦)空气中及云杉针叶中多氯二苯并对二噁英/多氯二苯并呋喃的浓度测量:初步结果
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006 Jan;63(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
4
The threat of COVID-19 to the conservation of Tanzanian national parks.新冠疫情对坦桑尼亚国家公园保护工作的威胁。
Biol Conserv. 2023 Jun;282:110037. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110037. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Mental health key to tourism infrastructure in China's new megapark.心理健康是中国新超级公园旅游基础设施的关键。
Tour Manag. 2021 Feb;82:104169. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104169. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Quest for NetZero emissions in South African national parks: A tourism perspective.从旅游业角度看南非国家公园实现净零排放的探索。
Heliyon. 2023 May 24;9(6):e16410. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16410. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
The relationship between drought and tourist arrivals: A case study of Kruger National Park, South Africa.干旱与游客到访量之间的关系:以南非克鲁格国家公园为例
Jamba. 2017 Jul 27;9(1):471. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.471. eCollection 2017.
8
Does a National Park Enhance the Environment-Friendliness of Tourists as an Ecotourism Destination?国家公园是否会提升游客对生态旅游目的地的环保意识?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;18(16):8321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168321.
9
Comprehensive evaluation and prediction of tourism ecological security in droughty area national parks-a case study of Qilian Mountain of Zhangye section, China.干旱区国家公园旅游生态安全的综合评价与预测——以中国张掖祁连山段为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(13):16816-16829. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12021-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
10
Economic valuation of selected ecosystem services in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), Pakistan.巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡首都特区(ICT)选定生态系统服务的经济估值。
Braz J Biol. 2022 Apr 22;84:e260614. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.260614. eCollection 2022.