Mostafavi Nariman, Fiocchi João, Dellacasa Manuel García, Hoque Simi
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Curtis 251, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk, McNeil 313, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
J Environ Stud Sci. 2022;12(2):311-326. doi: 10.1007/s13412-021-00721-1. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Sustainability has for long been promoted as a medium for social and economic development, one that focuses on constant availability of natural assets and ecological amenities. By questioning the possibility of reaching a balanced and sustainable state of functioning for social-ecological systems, resilience improves the static framework of sustainability by acknowledging non-linear behavior of complex systems, inevitability of change, and consistent presence of uncertainty. At the core of sustainable development, environmental policy is embedded in the socio-spatial structures that constantly re-organize and breed uncertainty, such as political, economic, and climate uncertainty. These uncertainties create episodes of instability that shock the entire system including the structures of environmental protection. In this article, focusing on the aftermath of 2016 US presidential election and 2018 general election in Brazil, both broadly recognized as political shocks, we highlight the vulnerabilities of environmental protection structures to the rise of conservative populist movements. We attribute these vulnerabilities, partially, to the superiority of market-based instruments, as well as apolitical understandings of resilience under neoliberalism that overlook political instabilities and socio-spatial outcomes of neoliberal restructuring projects. In our assessment, political unpreparedness of sustainability against the right-wing onslaught in the US and Brazil further underlines the need for resilience theory to incorporate sources of political instability in order to protect the environment.
长期以来,可持续性一直被视为社会和经济发展的一种媒介,它关注自然资产和生态便利设施的持续可得性。通过质疑社会生态系统能否达到一种平衡且可持续的运行状态,恢复力改善了可持续性的静态框架,因为它认识到复杂系统的非线性行为、变化的必然性以及不确定性的持续存在。在可持续发展的核心,环境政策嵌入在不断重新组织并滋生不确定性的社会空间结构中,比如政治、经济和气候方面的不确定性。这些不确定性引发不稳定事件,冲击包括环境保护结构在内的整个系统。在本文中,我们聚焦于2016年美国总统大选和2018年巴西大选的后果,这两者都被广泛视为政治冲击,我们强调了环境保护结构在保守民粹主义运动兴起面前的脆弱性。我们将这些脆弱性部分归因于基于市场的手段的优越性,以及新自由主义下对恢复力的非政治化理解,这种理解忽视了新自由主义重组项目的政治不稳定和社会空间结果。在我们的评估中,美国和巴西的可持续性在面对右翼冲击时的政治无准备,进一步凸显了恢复力理论纳入政治不稳定根源以保护环境的必要性。