Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Comparison of a Universal and Multitier Health Care System.

STUDY DESIGN

Ambispective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Canada has a government-funded universal health care system. The United States utilizes a multitier public and private system. The objective is to investigate differences in clinical outcomes between those surgically treated for lumbar disc herniation in a universal health care and multitier health system.

METHODS

Surgical lumbar disc herniation patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcome Research Network (CSORN) were compared with the surgical cohort enrolled in the Spine Patients Outcome Research Trial (SPORT) study. Baseline demographics and spine-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively.

RESULTS

The CSORN cohort consisted of 443 patients; the SPORT cohort had 763 patients. Patients in the CSORN cohort were older (46.4 ± 13.5 vs 41.0 ± 10.8, < .001) and were more likely to be employed (69.5% vs 60.3%, = .003). The CSORN cohort demonstrated significantly greater rates of satisfaction after surgery at 3 months (87.2% vs 64.8%, < .0001) and 1 year (85.6% vs 69.6%, < .0001). Improvements in back and leg pain followed similar trajectories in the two cohorts, but there was less improvement on ODI in the CSORN cohort ( < .01). On multivariable logistic regression, the CSORN cohort was a significant independent predictor of patient satisfaction at 1-year follow-up ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite less improvement on ODI, patients enrolled in CSORN, as part of a universal health care system, reported higher rates of satisfaction at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively compared to patients enrolled within a multitier health system.