Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Virulence. 2021 Dec;12(1):2562-2570. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1980179.
Evidence suggests that , which is shed in the milk, urine, feces, and birth products of infected domestic ruminants, can lead to Q fever disease following consumption of unpasteurized dairy products; however, is not believed to be a major gastrointestinal pathogen. Most infections are associated with inhalation of aerosols generated from the excreta of domestic ruminants. We recently demonstrated that delivered by oral gavage (OG) resulted in dissemination and an immune response; however, it is unclear how infection via the oral route compares to other well-established routes. Therefore, we delivered three strains of (representing three pertinent sequence types in the United States, such as ST16, ST20, and ST8) to immunocompetent mice in four doses via aerosol challenge (AC), intraperitoneal injection (IP), or OG. Low dose (10^5) of ST16 by OG was insufficient to cause infection, yet doses 1,000- or 100-fold lower by IP or AC, respectively, induced a robust immune response and dissemination. Despite being able to induce an immune response in a dose-dependent manner, administration of via OG is the least efficient route tested. Not only were the immune responses and bacterial loads diminished in mice exposed by OG relative to AC or IP, the efficiency of transmission was also inferior. High doses (10^8) were not sufficient to ensure transmission to 100% of the ST20 or ST8 cohorts. These results may provide some basis for why ingestion of as a mode of Q fever transmission is not often reported.
有证据表明,感染动物的粪便、尿液、胎粪和分泌物中存在的,可导致饮用未经巴氏消毒的奶制品后出现 Q 热疾病;然而,并非胃肠道的主要病原体。大多数感染与吸入来自家养反刍动物排泄物的气溶胶有关。我们最近证明,通过口服灌胃(OG)传递会导致传播和免疫反应;然而,通过口服途径感染与其他已确立的途径相比如何尚不清楚。因此,我们通过气溶胶挑战(AC)、腹腔内注射(IP)或 OG 将三种 (代表美国三种相关的序列类型,如 ST16、ST20 和 ST8)传递给免疫功能正常的小鼠,分为四个剂量。通过 OG 给予低剂量(10^5)的 ST16 不足以引起感染,但分别通过 IP 或 AC 给予 1000 或 100 倍低剂量,会引起强烈的免疫反应和传播。尽管通过 OG 能够以剂量依赖性方式诱导免疫反应,但通过 OG 给药是测试的最无效途径。与 AC 或 IP 相比,OG 给药的小鼠免疫反应和细菌负荷均降低,并且传输效率也较差。高剂量(10^8)不足以确保 ST20 或 ST8 队列的 100%传播。这些结果可能为为什么摄入作为 Q 热传播方式的报道并不常见提供了一些依据。