Division of Mental Health Care.
Department of Psychology.
Neuropsychology. 2021 Nov;35(8):809-821. doi: 10.1037/neu0000768. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
This 10-year longitudinal study investigated the developmental trajectories of executive functioning (EF) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), compared to typically developing (TD) individuals from childhood into young adulthood.
There were 173 participants at baseline (T1; ASD = 38 (eight with co-occurring ADHD), ADHD = 85, TD = 50; = 11.7 years, = 2.1), 168 at 2-year follow-up (T2) and 127 at 10-year follow-up (T3). Participants were assessed with three neuropsychological tests aimed at capturing central components of EF: working memory/Letter-Number Sequencing Test (LNS), inhibition/Color-Word Interference Test, Condition 3 (CWIT3), and flexibility/Trail Making Test, Condition 4 (TMT4). Test results were analyzed using linear mixed models (LMM).
At baseline, the TD participants outperformed the ASD and ADHD participants on all three tests. From T1 to T2, the ASD participants had less improvement than the ADHD and TD participants on the LNS test ( = .007 and .025, respectively), while having more improvement on the CWIT3 relative to the TD participants ( = .027). From T2 to T3, the ADHD participants had less improvement on the LNS test than the ASD and TD participants ( = .004 and .021, respectively).
The ASD and ADHD groups mainly displayed similar maturation on the neuropsychological measures, and displayed continuous impairment relative to the TD group. The need for support and facilitation of EF in school, workplace, and social arenas might continue into young adulthood among certain individuals with ASD and ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本十年纵向研究旨在探讨自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)或注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)个体与典型发育(TD)个体从儿童期到青年期的执行功能(EF)发展轨迹。
共有 173 名参与者在基线(T1;ASD=38 名(8 名伴有共患 ADHD),ADHD=85 名,TD=50 名;年龄=11.7 岁,SD=2.1)、2 年随访(T2)和 10 年随访(T3)时接受了 3 项神经心理学测试,旨在捕捉 EF 的核心成分:工作记忆/字母数字序列测试(LNS)、抑制/颜色-文字干扰测试、条件 3(CWIT3)和灵活性/连线测试、条件 4(TMT4)。使用线性混合模型(LMM)分析测试结果。
在基线时,TD 参与者在所有三项测试中的表现均优于 ASD 和 ADHD 参与者。从 T1 到 T2,ASD 参与者在 LNS 测试中的改善程度低于 ADHD 和 TD 参与者(分别为 p=.007 和 p=.025),而在 CWIT3 测试中的改善程度高于 TD 参与者(p=.027)。从 T2 到 T3,ADHD 参与者在 LNS 测试中的改善程度低于 ASD 和 TD 参与者(分别为 p=.004 和 p=.021)。
ASD 和 ADHD 组主要在神经心理学测量方面表现出相似的成熟度,并且相对于 TD 组表现出持续的损伤。在学校、工作场所和社交领域,某些 ASD 和 ADHD 个体可能需要持续支持和促进 EF。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。