• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统支持映射指导结直肠癌幸存者患者驱动的健康自我管理的可行性。

Feasibility of Systems Support Mapping to guide patient-driven health self-management in colorectal cancer survivors.

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2023 May;38(5):602-622. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1979549. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1080/08870446.2021.1979549
PMID:34570677
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8957632/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate feasibility of System Support Mapping (MAP), a systems thinking activity that involves creating a diagram of existing self-management activities (e.g. symptom management, health behaviors) to facilitate autonomous engagement in optimal self-management.

DESIGN

One-arm pilot study of MAP in colorectal cancer survivors (NCT03520283).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility of recruitment and retention (primary outcome), acceptability, and outcome variability over time.

RESULTS

We enrolled 24 of 66 cancer survivors approached (36%) and 20 completed follow-up (83%). Key reasons for declining participation included: not interested ( = 18), did not perceive a need ( = 9), and emotional distress/overwhelmed ( = 7). Most participants reported that MAP was acceptable (e.g. 80% liked MAP quite a bit/very much). Exploratory analyses revealed a -4.68 point reduction in fatigue from before to 2 weeks after MAP exceeding a minimally important difference ( = -0.68). There were also improvements in patient autonomy ( = 0.63), self-efficacy (for managing symptoms:  = 0.56, for managing chronic disease:  = 0.44), psychological stress ( = -0.45), anxiety ( = -0.34), sleep disturbance ( = -0.29) and pain ( = -0.32). Qualitative feedback enhanced interpretation of results.

CONCLUSIONS

MAP feasibility in colorectal cancer survivors was mixed, predominantly because many patients did not perceive a need for this approach. MAP was acceptable among participants and showed promise for improving health outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估系统支持映射(MAP)的可行性,这是一种系统思维活动,涉及创建现有自我管理活动(例如症状管理、健康行为)的图表,以促进自主参与最佳自我管理。

设计

一项针对结直肠癌幸存者的 MAP 单臂试点研究(NCT03520283)。

主要观察指标

招募和保留的可行性(主要结局)、可接受性以及随时间的结果变异性。

结果

我们招募了 66 名癌症幸存者中的 24 名(36%),其中 20 名完成了随访(83%)。拒绝参与的主要原因包括:不感兴趣( = 18)、认为没有必要( = 9)和情绪困扰/不知所措( = 7)。大多数参与者报告 MAP 是可以接受的(例如,80%的人非常喜欢 MAP)。探索性分析显示,从 MAP 之前到 2 周后,疲劳感降低了 4.68 分,超过了最小有意义差异( = -0.68)。患者自主性( = 0.63)、自我效能(管理症状: = 0.56,管理慢性病: = 0.44)、心理压力( = -0.45)、焦虑( = -0.34)、睡眠障碍( = -0.29)和疼痛( = -0.32)也有所改善。定性反馈增强了对结果的解释。

结论

MAP 在结直肠癌幸存者中的可行性喜忧参半,主要是因为许多患者认为不需要这种方法。参与者对 MAP 是可接受的,并且有望改善健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562d/8957632/83a42b4e7055/nihms-1761141-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562d/8957632/bb65ef5d760e/nihms-1761141-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562d/8957632/83a42b4e7055/nihms-1761141-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562d/8957632/bb65ef5d760e/nihms-1761141-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/562d/8957632/83a42b4e7055/nihms-1761141-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Systems Support Mapping to guide patient-driven health self-management in colorectal cancer survivors.系统支持映射指导结直肠癌幸存者患者驱动的健康自我管理的可行性。
Psychol Health. 2023 May;38(5):602-622. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1979549. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.结直肠癌和肺癌治疗后增强幸存者能力:自我管理幸存者护理计划干预的试点研究
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Feasibility, engagement, and acceptability of a behavioral pain management intervention for colorectal cancer survivors with pain and psychological distress: data from a pilot randomized controlled trial.一种行为性疼痛管理干预措施用于结直肠癌幸存者疼痛和心理困扰的可行性、参与度和可接受性:一项先导随机对照试验的数据。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep;29(9):5361-5369. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06126-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Feasibility Randomised Control Trial of OptiMal: A Self-Management Intervention for Cancer Survivors.OptiMal:癌症幸存者自我管理干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 29;30(12):10195-10210. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120742.
5
The effectiveness of mHealth for self-management in improving pain, psychological distress, fatigue, and sleep in cancer survivors: a systematic review.移动医疗在改善癌症幸存者疼痛、心理困扰、疲劳和睡眠方面的自我管理效果:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):97-107. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0730-8. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
6
7
Randomized controlled pilot trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction compared to psychoeducational support for persistently fatigued breast and colorectal cancer survivors.针对持续性疲劳的乳腺癌和结直肠癌幸存者,基于正念减压疗法与心理教育支持对比的随机对照试验性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4085-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3220-4. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
Feasibility of a Smartphone-based pilot intervention for Hispanic breast cancer survivors: a brief report.基于智能手机的西班牙语裔乳腺癌幸存者先导干预的可行性:简要报告。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):638-645. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby058.
9
Cooking for Vitality: Pilot Study of an Innovative Culinary Nutrition Intervention for Cancer-Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors.烹饪焕发活力:癌症幸存者相关疲劳的创新性烹饪营养干预的初步研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 10;12(9):2760. doi: 10.3390/nu12092760.
10
Feasibility of OptiMaL, a Self-Management Programme for Oesophageal Cancer Survivors.OptiMaL,一种食管癌幸存者自我管理方案的可行性研究。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231185002. doi: 10.1177/10732748231185002.

引用本文的文献

1
Study design and methods for the physical activity index (PAI) feasibility pilot trial for breast and colon cancer survivors in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州乳腺癌和结肠癌幸存者身体活动指数(PAI)可行性试点试验的研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Aug 7;47:101530. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101530. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Advancing Global Cancer Symptom Science: Insights and Strategies from the Inaugural Cancer Symptom Science Expert Meeting.推进全球癌症症状科学:首届癌症症状科学专家会议的见解与策略
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug;41(4):151905. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151905. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
3
Pilot study of implementing the Shared Healthcare Actions & Reflections Electronic systems in Survivorship (SHARE-S) program in coordination with clinical care.

本文引用的文献

1
Social needs and health-related quality of life among African American cancer survivors: Results from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study.非裔美国癌症幸存者的社会需求和健康相关生活质量:来自底特律癌症幸存者研究的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):467-475. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33286. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Enhancing survivorship care planning for patients with localized prostate cancer using a couple-focused web-based, mHealth program: the results of a pilot feasibility study.利用基于网络的夫妻聚焦型移动医疗程序增强局限性前列腺癌患者生存护理计划:一项试点可行性研究的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00914-7. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
实施与临床护理相协调的生存共享医疗行动和反思电子系统(SHARE-S)计划的初步研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12847-12860. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5965. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Adaptation of a Personalized Electronic Care Planning Tool for Cancer Follow-up Care: Formative Study.一种用于癌症随访护理的个性化电子护理计划工具的适配:形成性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 10;7:e41354. doi: 10.2196/41354.
PROMIS 4-item measures and numeric rating scales efficiently assess SPADE symptoms compared with legacy measures.
PROMIS 4 项测量和数字评定量表与传统测量方法相比,能更有效地评估 SPADE 症状。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
System Support Mapping: A Novel Systems Thinking Tool Applied to Assess the Needs of Maternal and Child Health Title V Professionals and Their Partners.系统支持映射:一种应用于评估母婴健康标题 V 专业人员及其合作伙伴需求的新型系统思维工具。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):E42-E53. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000941.
5
A Qualitative, Systems Thinking Approach to Study Self-Management in Women With Migraine.一种用于研究偏头痛女性自我管理的定性系统思维方法。
Nurs Res. 2018 Sep/Oct;67(5):395-403. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000301.
6
Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.结直肠癌和肺癌治疗后增强幸存者能力:自我管理幸存者护理计划干预的试点研究
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Validation of the PROMIS measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions.慢性病自我管理效能感的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)指标验证
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul;26(7):1915-1924. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
8
Complementary Tools to Empower and Sustain Behavior Change: Motivational Interviewing and Mindfulness.赋能并维持行为改变的补充工具:动机性访谈与正念
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Nov;10(6):429-436. doi: 10.1177/1559827615571524. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
Behavioral and Social Sciences at the National Institutes of Health: adoption of research findings in health research and practice as a scientific priority.美国国立卫生研究院的行为与社会科学:将健康研究与实践中研究成果的应用作为一项科学重点。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):380-384. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0474-4.
10
The impact of cancer survivorship care plans on patient and health care provider outcomes: a current perspective.癌症生存护理计划对患者及医疗服务提供者结局的影响:当前观点
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):134-138. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266080. Epub 2017 Jan 13.