• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型间隔器技术在处理感染性髋关节翻修术中的初步结果。

Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Lausmann Christian, Citak Mustafa, Hessling Udo, Wolff Matthias, Gehrke Thorsten, Suero Eduardo M, Zahar Akos

机构信息

Prosthetic Joint Infection Centre, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstraße 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1617-1622. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3038-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-018-3038-2
PMID:30229341
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical failure due to dislocation, fracture and acetabular wear is a major complication associated with the use of spacers in the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We have developed a novel custom-made spacer in the setting of two-stage septic revision hip arthroplasty and present the preliminary results of our technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2015 and November 2017, 30 patients underwent hip revision using the ENDO spacer technique in the setting of a two-stage septic exchange arthroplasty. The technique involves the dual mobility liner and the downsized stainless cemented straight stem in combination with antibiotic-loaded PMMA bone cement. The primary outcome measure was the overall spacer complication rate, particularly spacer dislocation. Furthermore, functional outcome using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) before spacer implantation and prior re-implantation was evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 69.8 years (range from 45 to 85; SD = 9.9 years). No microorganisms were preoperatively found in 23 (76.7%) cases. Successful re-implantation was performed in all patients after a mean spacer duration time of 53.6 days (range 14-288 days; SD = 48.2). Spacer-related complications occurred in only two patients (6.7%). The HHS significantly improved from 34.0 (range 3-62; SD = 15.1) to 48.1 (range 11-73; SD = 15.7) (p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

The ENDO spacer surgical technique is a feasible option in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with a low dislocation rate. Furthermore, it allows early mobilization with the possibility of full-weight bearing.

摘要

引言

脱位、骨折和髋臼磨损导致的机械故障是人工关节周围感染(PJI)治疗中使用间隔器的主要并发症。我们在两期感染性髋关节翻修术中开发了一种新型定制间隔器,并展示了我们技术的初步结果。

材料与方法

2015年5月至2017年11月期间,30例患者在两期感染性置换关节成形术中采用ENDO间隔器技术进行髋关节翻修。该技术包括双动衬垫和尺寸缩小的不锈钢骨水泥直柄,与含抗生素的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)骨水泥联合使用。主要观察指标是间隔器的总体并发症发生率,尤其是间隔器脱位。此外,还评估了间隔器植入前和再次植入前使用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)的功能结果。

结果

患者的平均年龄为69.8岁(范围45至85岁;标准差=9.9岁)。23例(76.7%)患者术前未发现微生物。所有患者在平均间隔器使用时间53.6天(范围14至288天;标准差=48.2)后成功进行了再次植入。仅2例患者(6.7%)出现与间隔器相关的并发症。HHS评分从34.0(范围3至62;标准差=15.1)显著提高到48.1(范围11至73;标准差=15.7)(p=0.0008)。

结论

ENDO间隔器手术技术是治疗人工关节周围感染(PJI)的一种可行选择,脱位率低。此外,它允许早期活动并有可能完全负重。

相似文献

1
Preliminary results of a novel spacer technique in the management of septic revision hip arthroplasty.一种新型间隔器技术在处理感染性髋关节翻修术中的初步结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1617-1622. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3038-2. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Specific Articulating Antibiotic Spacer Design: Reliable Periprosthetic Joint Infection Eradication and Functional Improvement.两阶段翻修全髋关节置换术结合特定活动型抗生素间隔物设计:可靠的假体周围关节感染清除和功能改善。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Dec;33(12):3746-3753. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
3
The Influence of Spacer Design on the Rate of Complications in Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty.间隔物设计对两阶段翻修髋关节置换术并发症发生率的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Mechanical failure of articulating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: the risk factors and the impact on interim function.在二期翻修髋关节置换术中,关节聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)间隔物的机械失效:危险因素及其对中期功能的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 14;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2759-x.
5
[ANTIBIOTIC-IMPREGNATED ARTICULAR CEMENT SPACER FOR TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION].用于治疗人工关节周围感染的抗生素骨水泥间隔物
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;29(4):420-5.
6
Two stage revision hip arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection. Comparison study: with or without the use of a spacer.人工关节周围感染的两阶段翻修髋关节置换术。比较研究:使用或不使用间隔物。
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2253-2258. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3500-8. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
[Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods].[全髋关节置换术后假体周围感染的两阶段翻修术:两种方法的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(3):179-185.
8
Preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacers for two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results.用于感染性全髋关节置换二期翻修的预成型载抗生素骨水泥间隔物。长期结果。
Hip Int. 2012 Jul-Aug;22 Suppl 8:S46-53. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9570.
9
Destination Joint Spacers: A Similar Infection-Relief Rate But Higher Complication Rate Compared with Two-Stage Revision.目的关节间隔物:与两阶段翻修相比,具有相似的感染缓解率但并发症发生率更高。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):884-891. doi: 10.1111/os.12996. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
10
The results of screw augmentation of acetabular cement spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic hip joint infection.髋臼水泥间隔物螺钉增强治疗人工髋关节置换术后感染的结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01950-w.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of acetabular cement augmentation in 2-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection of the hip.髋臼水泥强化在髋关节假体感染二期翻修中的作用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec;144(12):5251-5260. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05541-w. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Long Cephalomedullary Nails Can Be a Cheap and Effective Interval Revision Prosthesis in Infected Hip Replacements That Require Proximal Femoral Replacement: A Small Case Series.对于需要近端股骨置换的感染性髋关节置换术,长型股骨髓内钉可作为一种廉价且有效的间隔期翻修假体:一项小型病例系列研究。
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Oct 3;23:101218. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101218. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Enhanced antibiotic release from bone cement spacers utilizing dual antibiotic loading with elevated vancomycin concentrations in two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.
利用双抗生素加载并提高万古霉素浓度,从骨水泥间隔器中增强抗生素释放,用于二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染。
Int Orthop. 2023 Nov;47(11):2655-2661. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05922-7. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
4
Mechanical strength of antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacers in two-stage revision surgery.载抗生素 PMMA spacer 在二期翻修术中的机械强度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Oct 29;23(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05895-5.
5
Cure rate of infections is not an argument for spacer in two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip.感染治愈率并不是髋关节二期翻修术中使用间隔器的理由。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04463-9. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Quality of life, infection control, and complication rates using a novel custom-made articulating hip spacer during two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.在二期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染中使用新型定制可活动髋关节 spacer 时的生活质量、感染控制和并发症发生率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):4041-4054. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04274-4. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Improved patient reported outcomes with functional articulating spacers in two-stage revision of the infected hip.在感染性髋关节二期翻修术中使用功能性活动间隔器可改善患者报告的结局。
World J Orthop. 2020 Dec 18;11(12):595-605. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.595.
8
Progress of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in joint arthroplasty.载抗生素骨水泥在关节置换术中的研究进展。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Oct 20;133(20):2486-2494. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001093.
9
Hip Spacers with a Metal-on-Cement Articulation Did Not Show Significant Surface Alterations of the Metal Femoral Head in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.在假体周围关节感染的二期翻修中,采用金属与骨水泥关节连接的髋关节间隔物未显示出金属股骨头有明显的表面改变。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;13(17):3882. doi: 10.3390/ma13173882.
10
High 2-year mortality and recurrent infection rates after surgical treatment for primary septic arthritis of the hip in adult patients: An observational study.成年患者髋关节原发性化脓性关节炎手术治疗后两年死亡率和复发感染率较高:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16765. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016765.