Mederake Moritz, Hofmann Ulf K, Benda Sebastian, Schuster Philipp, Fink Bernd
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Aachen Medical Center, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;11(8):1098. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081098.
The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and the serum white blood cell (WBC) count is still barely defined for decision making during septic two-stage revision surgery of hip arthroplasty. We, therefore, compared these values between stages as well as between the groups without and with reinfection in 117 patients. A total of 106 patients were reinfection-free (91%). The median follow-up was 51 months. With a ΔCRP of -10 mg/L and a ΔWBC count of -1000/µL, a significant decrease between stages ( = 0.001) could be observed. When comparing the CRP and WBC count values between groups, however, no significant difference was found at stage one, stage two and even the difference between these two time points (reinfection-free ΔCRP of -11 mg/L and ΔWBC count of -1000/µL vs. reinfection ΔCRP of -5 mg/L ( = 0.131) and ΔWBC count of -1100/µL) ( = 0.424). The diagnostic value was poor for the calculated parameters (area under the curve (AUC) 0.5-0.6). The courses of the mean CRP values of both groups were similar. We conclude that the CRP and WBC count are not helpful to guide the decision making in individual cases.
在髋关节置换术的脓毒症二期翻修手术中,C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清白细胞(WBC)计数的诊断价值在决策制定方面仍未明确界定。因此,我们比较了117例患者各阶段以及未发生再感染组和发生再感染组之间的这些数值。共有106例患者未发生再感染(91%)。中位随访时间为51个月。CRP差值为-10 mg/L,白细胞计数差值为-1000/µL,各阶段之间可观察到显著下降( = 0.001)。然而,在比较两组之间的CRP和白细胞计数数值时,在第一阶段、第二阶段甚至这两个时间点之间的差异均未发现显著差异(未发生再感染组CRP差值为-11 mg/L,白细胞计数差值为-1000/µL,与发生再感染组CRP差值为-5 mg/L( = 0.131),白细胞计数差值为-1100/µL相比)( = 0.424)。计算参数的诊断价值较差(曲线下面积(AUC)为0.5 - 0.6)。两组的平均CRP值变化过程相似。我们得出结论,CRP和白细胞计数无助于指导个别病例的决策制定。