School of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 Dublin, Ireland.
Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, D02 Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(18):9542. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189542.
COVID-19 is arguably the most critical science communication challenge of a generation, yet comes in the wake of a purported populist turn against scientific expertise in western societies. This study advances understanding of science-society relations during the COVID-19 pandemic by analysing how science was represented in news and social media coverage of COVID-19 on the island of Ireland. Thematic analysis was performed on a dataset comprising 952 news articles and 603 tweets published between 1 January and 31 May 2020. Three themes characterised the range of meanings attached to science: 'Defining science: Its subjects, practice and process', 'Relating to science: Between veneration and suspicion' and 'Using science: As solution, policy and rhetoric'. The analysis suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic represented a platform to highlight the value, philosophy, process and day-to-day activity of scientific research. However, the study also identified risks the pandemic might pose to science communication, including feeding public alienation by disparaging lay understandings, reinforcing stereotypical images of scientists, and amplifying the politicisation of scientific statements.
COVID-19 可以说是一代人面临的最关键的科学传播挑战,但它是在西方社会对科学专业知识的所谓民粹主义转向之后出现的。本研究通过分析 COVID-19 在爱尔兰岛的新闻和社交媒体报道中科学的呈现方式,增进了对 COVID-19 期间科学与社会关系的理解。对 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日期间发布的 952 篇新闻文章和 603 条推文的数据集进行了主题分析。三个主题描绘了与科学相关的一系列含义:“定义科学:其主题、实践和过程”、“与科学相关:在崇敬和怀疑之间”和“使用科学:作为解决方案、政策和修辞”。该分析表明,COVID-19 大流行代表了一个突出科学研究价值、哲学、过程和日常活动的平台。然而,该研究还确定了大流行可能对科学传播构成的风险,包括通过贬低外行理解、强化对科学家的刻板印象以及放大科学声明的政治化来加剧公众的疏远。