Choi Yun-Suk, Shin Woo-Young, Yi Jin-Wook
Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital & College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 7;10(18):4048. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184048.
Robotic bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) thyroid surgery began in 2008 and is now one of the most widely used remote-access thyroid surgeries worldwide. This study aimed to analyze the results of 500 robotic BABA thyroid surgeries performed in a single institution in Korea compared with open thyroid surgery.
From December 2018 to March 2020, 502 robotic BABA thyroidectomies (RTs) and 531 conventional open thyroidectomies (OTs) were performed in our institution by a single endocrine surgeon. We retrospectively reviewed patient medical records and performed a comparative analysis of OT and RT.
The RT group was younger (43.41 ± 11.41 versus 54.28 ± 13.41 years, < 0.001) and had a higher proportion of females (84.3% versus 69.3%, < 0.001), a lower BMI (24.66 ± 3.97 versus 25.83 ± 4.07 kg/m), a higher proportion of lobectomies (52.6% versus 45.2%) and a lower proportion of lateral neck dissections (3.4% versus 10.0%, < 0.001). The RT group had a longer operation time (145.33 ± 40.80 versus 93.39 ± 43.55 min, < 0.001) and higher surgical costs. Although the OT group had a larger tumor size and a higher proportion of extrathyroidal extension, the numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, there was no difference in the stimulated thyroglobulin level before radioactive iodine therapy (7.01 ± 35.73 versus 8.39 ± 58.77, = 0.782). The rates of transient vocal cord palsy and transient hypoparathyroidism were significantly lower in the RT group, and those of scar-related complications were higher in the OT group.
Robotic BABA thyroid surgery has advantages not only in better cosmetic outcomes but also in lower rates of vocal cord palsy and hypoparathyroidism, with comparable lymph node retrieval and serum thyroglobulin levels.
机器人双侧腋窝入路(BABA)甲状腺手术始于2008年,目前是全球应用最广泛的远程入路甲状腺手术之一。本研究旨在分析韩国一家机构进行的500例机器人BABA甲状腺手术与开放甲状腺手术的结果。
2018年12月至2020年3月,由一名内分泌外科医生在我们机构进行了502例机器人BABA甲状腺切除术(RTs)和531例传统开放甲状腺切除术(OTs)。我们回顾性分析了患者的病历,并对OT和RT进行了对比分析。
RT组患者更年轻(43.41±11.41岁对54.28±13.41岁,P<0.001),女性比例更高(84.3%对69.3%,P<0.001),体重指数更低(24.66±3.97对25.83±4.07kg/m²),甲状腺叶切除术比例更高(52.6%对45.2%),侧颈淋巴结清扫比例更低(3.4%对10.0%,P<0.001)。RT组手术时间更长(145.33±40.80分钟对93.39±43.55分钟,P<0.001),手术费用更高。虽然OT组肿瘤更大,甲状腺外侵犯比例更高,但两组的淋巴结清扫数量无显著差异。此外,放射性碘治疗前刺激甲状腺球蛋白水平无差异(7.01±35.73对8.39±58.77,P=0.782)。RT组暂时性声带麻痹和暂时性甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率显著更低,OT组与瘢痕相关并发症的发生率更高。
机器人BABA甲状腺手术不仅在美容效果方面具有优势,而且声带麻痹和甲状旁腺功能减退的发生率更低,淋巴结清扫及血清甲状腺球蛋白水平相当。